There is no karmic debt. Only judgement by the One and Holy God.
And according to His judgement, one sin, one act of imperfection, means death. From the highest crime to the lowest.
I tried to make my position there clear in a less direct, heavy-handed way, but that is where I am coming from.
In my view, no one is truly good. We are all capable of both good and evil, sure, but no one is perfectly, truly good. And as good can not dwell with evil, being "largely good", even if true, will get us nowhere.
All of our history demonstrates that our nature is sin, not good. And the hand-wave that is blaming the cabal for everything is unsatisfying. The problem isn't just the cabal, it's human nature.
Wow, Christians believe in their Holy Book. Incredible.
Good and evil is a binary. Sure, in the day to day it varies, but in the grand scheme of things, it is one or the other.
If someone is 99% good, but the other 1% is them being a serial killer, they are not a good person.
If someone is 99% good, but the other 1% they lie to cheat people out of stuff and enrich themselves, they are not a good person.
Everybody does something bad from time to time, so nobody is truly good.
Just because most people aren't a 1% demon doesn't make us largely good. History demonstrates that we are not, and handwaving that as some cabal lie or as if the cabal were/are behind everything bad, is to completely deny our observable reality, where people are perfectly happy to wish death upon those they are told to hate by the media, without a second thought.
Is being susceptible to lies and fearmongering a trait of someone who is good? Are people who wish death on others in response to lies and fearmongering good?
To boil down even further towards the Truth: If humanity were largely good, we would not need a savior.
Good can not dwell with evil. The fact that all fall short and do wrong, means we are not good. 50% good is not good enough.
Why do children lie without being taught? Self-interest and a lack of innate morals to understand why doing so is bad.
Now those are harder to answer, but whatever the answer is, it's not "because all the citizens of Israel are evil".
Also, there are other countries with similar laws.
Full disclosure: I asked ChatGPT for this info, so its accuracy may not be 100%, but this is the list it gave:
Russia
China
Brazil
Argentina
Iran
Venezuela
North Korea
As for why not more countries, why does it matter? The deepstate doesn't care if they prosecute you in America or France.
In Israel's case, it may just be that the evil people at the top want to be safe in their own little ethnostate that they completely control.
America, for example, isn't really the same. The country is huge, and no deepstate cronies would want to be here if shit hit the fan for them. Same thing anywhere in Europe. They would just leave. No reason to not be able to be extradited for them, and it allows them to fuck us over easier. What would the point be?
Basically, Israel is the perfect place to run to for the people to whom it applies.
Cool idea and it makes a lot of sense.
I'm sure it would short-circuit the brains of all the climate-alarmists, though.
Trump's stance is that it is imperative to fund a sustained war in the Middle East with no end in sight?
Weird, I distinctly remember Trump starting no new wars and being against the forever wars we already were in. Certainly not interested in starting new ones.
What do you think they're going to do? Explicitly write that it only applies to deepstate cabal members?
Not all such people are in government.
If humanity were largely good, it would not be possible for the few to commit evil against the many.
The explosion on the right side has the missile coming in at a near horizontal angle. It's only on-screen for one frame. Kinda like the missi- I mean airplane that hit the Pentagon.
They won't be able to walk down the street.
Who's the dude with the gun in the 3rd photo link? Surely no one gets into D.C. dressed like that unless they are military.
I was thinking "lil nugs" for "little nuggets".
Without going back 5 years and looking into all the Q proofs that have been connected with the pots, one can't really come to the conclusion that there is a plan. I'd agree that solely looking at what is currently happening doesn't give any strong indication of such a plan existing.
Do you disagree with my assertion, or is your only interest to discredit the notion that a plan exists?
Baffling how the Operation Trust accusations against Q are answered with "it wouldn't be worth it for the deepstate to wake up all those people vs just enslaving them in secret" but when Musk is waking up maybe millions it's "but muh deepstate puppet!"
You read my comment astronomically wrong kek. Read better. Seriously.
Your phone is rootkitted to the fucking moon by the government, and the companies that make the hardware and software are de facto state agencies. They don't need some elaborate EAS broadcast to control your phone, they already do.
If they didn't control everyone's phones, the people whose phones they would most want to control would be us. Why then would they telegraph their EAS plan? We are the only ones prone to finding out that kind of stuff. So the people they most want control over the phones of, would be the people most likely to not allow it to happen if stuffing their phone in a microwave was all it took.
If they don't already have control, they aren't going after normies, they're going after us. They wouldn't then base their plan around the EAS that we've been watching for years, because if they did, they'd only get normies and not us.
All of that is moot though because your phone is one big rootkit under the sole control of the intelligence agencies and Joe Biden's last functioning braincell.
Sure, but that doesn't change the fact we can't expect a sign as proof of the plan based on the context and what the plan supposedly entails.
If there was a complex military operation to save the world from the deepstate cabal, I would think that the last thing they would do is give out signs confirming that is their plan.
Surely if the government wanted to drop a rootkit in every phone in the country they just do it whenever they want, and not telegraph it to the very people most likely to attempt to protect themselves, who also happen to be the same people they'd most want to rootkit the phone of.
Also dispels the junk argument that it "involves too many people to be a conspiracy!!!".
There might as well be approximately 6 people running this whole thing from the top that everyone else has to bend over for.
All I've seen Byron Donalds say is "Look, I'm gonna be honest. We did not get anything out of this continued resolution" and "I think [McCarthy] is in trouble. There has to be some level of strong leadership in our chamber, I'm just gonna be totally blunt. There are a lot of trust issues in our chamber right now, where people feel on both sides of our conference that everybody's not gonna hold hands and continue to do this work together."
What's the best thing to invest in to not go bankrupt when FIAT goes down the toilet? Gold? Silver? Crypto? GameStop? Something else?
"Let's think of the nuclear arms, of the possibility to annihilate in a few instants a very high number of human beings," he continues. "Let's think also of genetic manipulation, of the manipulation of life, or of the gender theory, that does not recognize the order of creation. With this attitude, man commits a new sin, that against God the Creator," the pope says. "The true custody of creation does not have anything to do with the ideologies that consider man like an accident, like a problem to eliminate. God has placed man and woman and the summit of creation and has entrusted them with the earth," Francis says. "The design of the Creator is written in nature."
-Pope Francis
The Pope is not perfect, and I am not Catholic (yet), but it's not so easy as I continuously seem to discover to discredit him.
With that said. None of the problems Nietzsche (somewhat) correctly identified are problems with Christianity. They are problems with Man, and problems that are absolutely not guaranteed end results of Christianity. Being a strong pagan would not change this. It would only expedite the decay of society, as it always has. Paganism leads to death and destruction every time it's accepted for the same reason Satan worship does: Christ is Lord.
As for pagans, they fucking love trannies, it seems. I'm sure they're not as opposed to communism as the Bible is either. Demons in the Bible are identified as "they", as well. Though it hardly matters. You're right about power and might being revered preventing all this shit. But then again, that has nothing to do with Paganism or Christianity, but is completely separate of either.
And in what world is the Church, which conducted several holy crusades to defend themselves from Muslims, the bringer of the "love" and "tolerance" crap you mention? The "love" and "tolerance" crap infiltrated the Church, at worst. It was not somehow born out of a religion that doesn't preach it in the way the people weaponizing it claim it does.
The Bible preaches love and tolerance, not "love" and "tolerance". I'd wager a guess that Nietzsche also didn't know the difference.
So no, the problem is not the guaranteed end result of Christianity. The problem is that Christians have cucked and been deceived, as all on this Earth have. But if this shit is the guaranteed end result of Christianity, then it is the guaranteed end result of every religion. Any other religion is just as open to corruption and twisting by the people who desire to do so.
The solution is strong, Christian men standing up for truth. That is what we had for 1700 years, and it is likely what delayed the decay as long as it did.
Also, honor, strength, and heroism? Displaced by the Church? Give me a break. Those 3 words describe all of Church history, save 300 years. The only thing that was displaced was the Church by dishonor, weakness, and villainy, not the other way around.
Medieval knights. Holy crusaders. Sure, it wasn't as perfect and good as the stories make it sound, but for nearly 2 thousand years we had relative moral justice, as a direct result of what was a nearly completely Christian society, dominated by the Church. Interestingly, the Protestant reformation coincides with the decay (note, I am a Protestant saying this). But "muh Church".
My conclusion remains: Nietzsche was a fool. Certainly leagues better than the modern day leftist, but, nonetheless, fell victim to an inability to assign problems to correct causes, all the same.
I wonder how many people throughout history have been unjustly executed for joining some group/society with the sole intent of infiltrating it and destroying it from within.