1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

We will all perish if we simply sit back and allow evil to overcome us. Evil doesn't care about our words or our boycotts. It will appeal to the lowest common denominator until there aren't enough of us left to do anything.

Walk softly and carry a big stick. Obviously we shouldn't rush to violence, but self-defense is permitted, and there comes a time when we must defend ourselves. If we never did, we'd all be Muslims right now.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think that if refusing to fight is the way to be Christian, then there is no Christianity. The idea that only in, at most, the last 300 years we have found out how to actually be Christian is absurd to me. That simply would tell me that Christianity is no different from any other passing cultural belief. Since I believe that Christianity is much more than that, the only conclusion left is that fighting is not wrong, and we had it right before.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

It kind of sucks that she missed a funeral for family over this shit, but then again, she did it to herself.

Can't let these people get away with shit like this as if it's no big deal just because they backtrack and say they'll be nice.

Glad the captain was based and just booted her. She probably wouldn't have been able to bite her tongue once they were in the air anyway.

2
SpaceManBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're arguing against the cryptobro in your head at this point kek

Over here, I actually agree with virtually all of that, especially "I like things I can hold in my hand. It's how my people survived for hundreds of years. In a world of bait and switch, some of us are beyond tired of the bs and returning to our roots and ancestral wisdom."

I truly would like nothing more than a return to a more traditional system where people use silver coins to buy goods and services from their local community. I meant it when I said "best case scenario". That would be my personal ideal. Of course, part of that still includes something for online financial transactions when they occur.

My point was basically this: Aside from the ideal scenario, which I find unlikely to become the norm, precious metals only work/are only going to be optimal in a survival scenario. This is fine, but it's a solved problem if concerns over such a scenario become real: buy metals, sit on metals, repeat until shit hits the fan.

The unsolved problem is what do we replace the online system with. My suggestion was simply that crypto is the solution for that, chiefly Bitcoin.

Also, in the particular case of an economic crash: Bitcoin does really well when the dollar does really shit. Do you really think the average millennial city dweller will run out to buy precious metals over crypto if they see the dollar tanking in value? Doesn't matter if it's dumb or worse than physical gold/silver if it's what a large portion of people do. Up until the moment that the power starts going out, most people will prefer the easy thing, which is online funny money. Only once their access to their online money is visibly shown to be in doubt will most people want something they can hold. So depending on how long a crash lasted for, and depending on if Bitcoin could take over the position of the dollar before the internet/power shuts off, there may not even be a point where the vast majority of normies rush to precious metals.

And to clarify, by "your solution doesn't work", I was referring to precious metals as a kind of 'all we need' solution. If that isn't what you were suggesting, then my bad and carry on stacking fren. (Personally, I've got a pitifully small stack, but it's better than nothing)

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your system doesn't work. Most people buy shit online, and, as much as I love silver/gold/etc., you aren't doing that with coins. Like, I guess if you sit at home all day prepping your system works, but most people don't do that and that will never become the accepted financial system countrywide.

Even in a best case scenario where people start getting outside and buying almost everything locally, there still needs to be some way to transfer money online for certain things.

Maybe instead of worrying about "muh coronal mass ejection" or some other wildly unlikely nonsense, you could actually research a comprehensive solution and what that may look like. You've already got long-term blackout covered; what about other scenarios?

2
SpaceManBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Lawfulness" is dependent on the current ruling power.

And I would suggest that the best option currently would be to promptly start a crusade and put a stop to the evil that threatens our very existence. Being slow to retaliate is good, but never doing anything is not.

So she's right, and I'd also suggest that Satanists are the lowest of the low. Additionally, Muslims blow random shit up just about as often as the CIA do, if not far less often than the CIA.

2
SpaceManBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why our country is going to shit.

2
SpaceManBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep, in the current scenario I would always prefer a Kari Lake to a Joe Biden, given no other choices.

Ideally we have strong men, but that isn't always the case, unfortunately.

2
SpaceManBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

What the hell fren, same some tits for the rest of us!

6
SpaceManBob 6 points ago +6 / -0

Dude was tortured in a dungeon.

There is truly nothing new under the sun.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's not pretend we wouldn't be screaming insurrection if Obama did the same thing in January 2017 after Trump won.

And we don't need to paint with a "fair" brush. If Trump did what they claimed and tried to get a crowd to overthrow the leaders in Washington, it wouldn't have been an insurrection because he would have been stopping one. If Obama did it, it would have been an insurrection because Trump won fair and square. Context matters.

Alternatively, it's always an insurrection, but then we'd have to say that some insurrections are just.

I don't see a case where it's never an insurrection, since that would mean the sitting government can just ignore vote results they don't like with impunity regardless of circumstances. They agree to be bound by the will of the people, and so if they ignore that after a fair vote, they are committing insurrection. They represent the people, they aren't in charge of their own power or merit, but by the blessing of the people.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just like the Praetorian Guard.

Nothing new under the sun.

14
SpaceManBob 14 points ago +14 / -0

Muh democracy is the most flagrant 1984 shit ever.

They will unironically call voting a threat to democracy near-weekly. And normies fucking fall for it.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who shit in your cereal for you to be so angry at the world, kek.

Also, you're a complete and utter fag, and your brain is pudding judging by all that you've said thus far (also the fact you clearly didn't read the full post above). Not much going on upstairs, that's for sure. All I can imagine is the "fat, drunk, piss-covered redneck living in a trailer" caricature that the left accuses us of all being, but you're actually it.

I mean, you couldn't even think of anything unique to say and instead just wrote the same shit-tier insult over and over. Nor could you actually come up with any valid critique of the above post (because you're an unqualified and monumentally ignorant moron, who thinks his own drivel is more relevant to the thread than the shit the other random anon posted. Newsflash, you're a nobody too, as we all are here), and instead simply whined for your whole comment. Though, I guess if I'm being fair, you did throw in some claims. Factually baseless and incorrect claims, but claims nonetheless. Intellectual laziness and ineptitude is your entire existence. Your conclusions, on the original topic and on every single thing you've said, are sophomoric and simplistic because of the fact that your brain is too slow, inefficient, and weak to output anything better.

Ultimately, the only special one here is you and your extreme interest in making good and sure that we all know what your opinion is. The thing is, nobody asked, and nobody cares. Go cry to someone else, and then you can act surprised when they react negatively to your exclusively negative, and most importantly objectively incorrect, nonsense.

Go be a male Karen somewhere else, nobody here wants to be despoiled by your pathetic presence and endless Ad Hominem/straw man responses (literally everything you wrote because you're a slow-brained idiot).

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

With absolutely no respect, you're brain-dead lol

3
SpaceManBob 3 points ago +3 / -0

I recently read something about people in Iceland living longer than many other places due to it being an inhospitable shithole (the only people who survive are tough). Reading this made me think of that, and so I thought to look up the rate of ADHD in Iceland. Lo and behold, an article comes up claiming Iceland holds the world record for prescription stimulant medications being taken.

The theory fucking works.

Edit: by the way, do you have a link to any of these posts u/StormzAComing?

3
SpaceManBob 3 points ago +3 / -0

Assuming anyone here believes him, and I personally do, this tells us something.

It tells us that someone in Elon's position doesn't automatically know shit. It tells us that these people who seem to be playing ball to get to the top don't all have perfect knowledge of this evil. And that tells us that they can flip, can join the side of good, and can be forgiven.

3
SpaceManBob 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seems like a lot of effort to kill a feeble old man who couldn't do anything even if the assassin was Trump's female Secret Service detail.

1
SpaceManBob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ogles can have the best of intentions and this can still be a shit idea. Not sure myself, but it could definitely fuck us over in November depending on how people react.

2
SpaceManBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their thinking isn't the problem, it's their consistently practiced actions that are egregious, if not evil.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›