2
Starsbottomleft 2 points ago +2 / -0

Being conservative means to conserve. The oil leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge was the only thing I disagreed on with President Trump.

1
Starsbottomleft 1 point ago +1 / -0

#7 The MSM is attempting to paint their reporters' coverage of the Wuhan Lab as an, 'oops!'. As opposed to the laying down of coverage on behalf of their Marxists overlords in the assault on the U.S. Don't let them get away with shaping a false narrative that absolves them from their treasonous crimes against the U.S.

1
Starsbottomleft 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely. The local Marxists should hang from the gallows with those imbedded at the state and federal level; all seditious, treasonous POSs. The only thing left for me in Portland now is the Great Columbia River.

2
Starsbottomleft 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every once beautiful city in our great country that has been infected by the cancer that is Marxism needs to be scoured clean. These cities deserve to be repopulated with people that exude the belief and pride in America upon which these once great cities were built in the first place. Portland and Seattle included. Otherwise I'm happy to let the Looney Left continue to burn them down.

2
Starsbottomleft 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its not a 'building' as much as its a 'castle'. What does Q say about 'castle'?

1
Starsbottomleft 1 point ago +1 / -0

Besides President Trump, you have the biggest heart for this country of public facing people in New York. Happy Birthday, RG!

1
Starsbottomleft 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're warning the voters that they should be concerned outsiders are looking into their stolen vote? Yeah, good luck with that!

2
Starsbottomleft 2 points ago +2 / -0

The article states that Bill was accompanied by SS agents. I think his detail privileges expired long ago. Unless an extension has been granted or, SOS position of Hillary's starts the 10 year clock again. Anybody have any thoughts on this?

1
Starsbottomleft 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think they're vaccines until the FDA approves them and says they're vaccines. Until then they're an EUA drug. As per the FDA:

The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) authority allows FDA to help strengthen the nation’s public health protections against chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) threats including infectious diseases, by facilitating the availability and use of medical countermeasures (MCMs) needed during public health emergencies.

Also;

a determination under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act that a public health emergency exists, such as the one issued on January 31, 2020, does not enable FDA to issue EUAs. On February 4, 2020, the HHS Secretary determined that there is a public health emergency that has a significant potential to affect national security or the health and security of United States citizens living abroad, and that involves the virus that causes COVID-19. Subsequent HHS declarations supporting use of EUAs and based on this determination are described in the blue boxes below.

2
Starsbottomleft 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a longish read but, really worth it. A real journalist, who knew?

1
Starsbottomleft 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey, Grammar Fag, good morning:)

5
Starsbottomleft 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trump talking about Rolls Royce engines is comparable to us average guys talking about putting a GM crate motor in our project truck. Billionaires' homes are way different than millionaires' homes, as a friend of mine that builds homes for both once said to me.

1
Starsbottomleft 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could it be a simple comm for everyone to see? Law of War Manual 15:2

15.2 APPLICATION OF THE LAW OF NEUTRALITY The application of the law of neutrality may depend on a State’s national policy towards an armed conflict. A State’s obligations under jus ad bellum, including its obligations under the Charter of the United Nations, may alter significantly its rights and duties under the law of neutrality. 15.2.1 Armed Conflict and the Application of the Law of Neutrality. 15.2.1.1 Application of the Law of Neutrality and the National Policies of States Towards an Armed Conflict. Whether the law of neutrality governs a State’s relations with belligerents in an armed conflict may depend on that State’s national policy towards that armed conflict.24 For example, if an armed conflict occurs, a State may choose to join the armed conflict, in which case it would no longer be neutral and the law of war rather than the law of neutrality would govern its relations with opposing belligerents.25 Similarly, if two States conduct hostilities against one another, but refuse to recognize a state of armed conflict, third States may reject this position and invoke the law of neutrality to protect their rights in relation to the armed conflict.26 In addition, outside States that recognize the belligerency of a rebel faction in a civil war may choose to apply the law of neutrality in their relations with the rebel faction and with the government.27

2
Starsbottomleft 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like the way you think.

4
Starsbottomleft 4 points ago +4 / -0

It would make more sense to use the vote to affect policy change and get Oregon back, at the very least, to center. We could start by eliminating mail in voting only. I have a hard time imagining the vote hasn't been getting cooked with this process since it began. There's a lot of based people here. There's a lot of weirdos but, a lot of based people, too.

2
Starsbottomleft 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm gonna laugh my ass off when its revealed that President Trump won by a margin of 120k votes and the media shrieks that Mike Lindell was wrong that Tump won by 80k votes.

2
Starsbottomleft 2 points ago +2 / -0

I bought a Panasonic microwave oven from Overstock a few months back because it listed the country of origination as Japan (my dad was 82nd Airborne in WWII and that's a whole different story!) even though it was more money. It arrived and it was made in China. I gave it to my kid. I still don't have a microwave oven.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›