This is why most of the adverse effects trace back to only 10 lots!
Last one! Vladamir Puppin
I'm trully ashamed!
A LOT of military aged males being brought in to our country and going to military bases. I would say you are onto something.
What a pile of stinking rotten dog shit!
Old vax used inactive (dead) virus to stimulate your immune system
mRNA uses the spike protein of the active Covid virus to create an immune response. The spike protein is only a small part of the virus. a narrow and shallow response is the big problem with this, among other problems.
First Joe Manchin and now this! Merry Christmas one and all!
What is this from?
They cheated most in heavy Dem areas for a National Election. Harder to do for 430+ separate House of Reps elections. The Senate races may be a different story.
Welcome to the party!
Very good post. Healthy debate is good for all. Hopefully, one day we can look back on all this with a victory on our side.
I like these debates. We can lend our opinions and all learn. It's all good!
I am not pushing that Q is a psyop.
But the intro statement of "proof that Q is real because..." can be challenged by my simple statement.
It therefore is not "proof" of anything.
No, just the next letter in the Greek Alphabet, since they skipped over Xi
My statement was simply a direct answer to the main argument that "proves Q is real". But since you commented.
Before Q, there was already a building movement against the Deep State. What better way to control that movement than a Q psyop "Everything is under control, follow the plan". A Q psyop would push the group away from Civil War, again "The Plan". Once they get to the point of disarming us it will be to late for a hot war, they would have full control over us. We are now in a position were we can only react, they will always be a step or two ahead of our reactions.
Once again this is if there are no White Hats and no Q.
Your reasoning does not take into account one thing...
If Q is a deep state Psyop.
Didn't say they weren't. LOL
My Brother in Law had one, bought it new and I got him going over 64 vs. 65. I asked him to prove it was a 64 show me the title. It said 65. He was PISSED cause I bet him $100!
From the Ford Mustang historical record
"Because the Mustang was introduced in 1964 but advertised as an early 1965 model, it is often referred to as the 1964 1/2 Mustang. Initial production of the second round of Mustangs began on August 17, 1964. Production included 92,705 standard coupes that retailed for $2,320 apiece and 28,883 standard convertibles that retailed for $2,557 each. Both the original production Mustangs and the second-run vehicles are technically considered 1965 Mustangs by Ford."
You fell for it. While the first production of Mustangs were built starting in August 1964. They were all titled as 1965 models by Ford. There was no 64, but they were marketed as 1964 1/2 because they were introduced a few months prior to the 1965 model year launch. Take a look at any title of an advertised 1964 Mustang and it will say 1965 on the title.
Wasn't the first year Mustang 1965? WTF
If Trump truly believes that the jab is safe and effective. WE HAVE A PROBLEM!