Summary: the stasi of the European Commission will empower their army of bureaucrats to define as "hate speech" or "illegal content" anything that threatens their power structure. This is a huge huge attack against democracy.
Apparently harmless categories such as "hate speech" and "misinformation" will be enshrined in law to be interpreted by bureaucrats and others who can easily interpret these concepts to censor what is deemed undesirable by the ruling powers.
This will shield the European Commission's narratives and propaganda (and those raining down from the United Nations). There will be an army of bureaucrats / fact-checkers telling people what the "correct position on topics" should be.
The funding through NIH came from the United States military, did it not? How would this not tie up to the United States military if it is revealed globally that the United States was behind these laboratories. Whatever happens, the military is going to look bad.
The title sounds encouraging but the text on that france24.com article is not:
French Prime Minister Jean Castex said Thursday that France will end audience capacity limits for concert halls, sporting matches and other events from February 2, part of a gradual lifting of Covid-19 restrictions made possible by a vaccine pass that will be required for most public areas starting Monday. Face masks will also no longer be required outside from February 2.
Maybe I do - it is such a huge amount of alternative platforms and individuals commenting on what happens that it becomes difficult to keep track.
Fact is, we were brigaded some months ago with promotions of Telegram channels for different people (Powell, Giuliani, Flynn, Pompeo, etc.) which ended up as nothing more than snakeskin sales of Trump coins and such.
It's natural that we remain skeptical, but willing to invest time.
What I saw in your link was a red flag for me: I understand operations have become more public (e.g., arrests of CNN staff), but how does it connect with what you posted?
That is what I was trying to understand, hope you can help, thanks!
Disclaimer: I did not post this to advertise this channel. This is a short video I have just found, and the message rings with things that have been discussed here at different times.
Are you sure this article may not be used as a reason for the fools to promote additional boosters?
catsfive, I have seen you do great work for this community, but I have to ask - is there any way we can find online the Israeli video that is shown on the laptop in that Bitchute video?
I don't speak Hebrew and I would like to cross-check with other people to understand and evaluate.
Thanks!
I don't understand, does the graphic in the article say that for every 100 000 vaccinated people, we have around 3 deaths, and for every 100 000 unvaccinated people, we have around 1.5 deaths?
Because if that is the correct interpretation, then it means nothing and this article is just trolling people who share without checking.
Consider this:
Vaccinated rate: 3 / 100 000 = 0.00003 (0.003%)
Unvaccinated rate: 1.5 / 100 000 = 0.000015 (0.0015%)
This is not statistically significant. It's like those mainstream media fake news articles where they say deaths increased by 50% but the actual death toll just jumped from 1 to 2.
I would ask you to please, when you share something like this again, to share the link to the article.
This article appears to be intellectually dishonest.
I searched for it and found this:
The author of this article on that link makes the claim that there was a suicide note.
However, that article then links one from Bild, which has no mention of suicide note:
After searching (on search engines), I found some pages claiming that the story of the anti-vaccine suicide letter was just a rumor.
I am not saying this story may not be true, but the way it was shared here (and without a source) makes me think it was just shared to make people look foolish (when they share without researching).
Daily reminder that this is in the worst case just astroturfing to promote Tulsi Gabbard, a "promising" Young Leader of the World Economic Forum (founded by "Great Reset" promoter Klaus Schwab).
Great work WinsAnon, as usual. I just want to add a comment.
UK study shows that death rate for people 10-59 years old is twice as high for vaccinated people than unvaccinated people https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/shocking-uk-study-stuns-medical-community-vaccinated-people-60-younger-twice-likely-die-unvaccinated-people/
Not to detract from wanting scrutiny over the COVID-19 vaccines, but this article of the Gateway Pundit needs clarification. If for example 95% of the population were vaccinated (the real number is lower), then it is no wonder there are more vaccinated than unvaccinated dying, simply because there are more vaccinated people.
I think vaccinations started in the United Kingdom around March/April and (according to Wikipedia) around 66.56% of the total UK population have received both vaccine doses. Not to dismiss the concerns many have, but these short articles without context have oftentimes been sensationalist and when shared without checking, make those who are worried look like fools.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_vaccination_in_the_United_Kingdom
I might as well be blind, but can you please point me in that web page where it is mentioned the tests do not differentiate between the flu and COVID-19? Thank you!
March 26th we get a statement from DJT "Where is Durham? Is he a living, breathing person? Will there ever be a Durham report?"
Do you have a link to the actual post by DJT? All I saw days ago was a pixelated image post. And if I go to https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news the latest news post to be found is earlier than 26.
Do we have fake news being taken as truth in GAW?
OP, is there a link to this tweet? Can't find it. Thanks.
EDIT: found it: https://x.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1708826762816155808?s=20