2
TestableHypothesis 2 points ago +2 / -0

The frequencies I was referring to were of the electromagnetic type. I am open to the developments of sound therapy as long as it uses repeatable methods.

2
TestableHypothesis 2 points ago +2 / -0

The frequencies I was referring to were of the electromagnetic type. I am open to the developments of sound therapy as long as it uses repeatable methods.

3
TestableHypothesis 3 points ago +3 / -0

You had me until "frequency therapy". I have done a bit of research into the so-called machines developed by R. R. (That's all the detail I'm giving.) To call them a scam would be naive. They are demonic, both their origins and how they are understood to work.
Among other points;

  • It does not use different frequencies. It uses pulse modulation. The frequency, wavelength, and energy it produces is always the same.
  • The supposed frequencies have not been verified. That is, there is no way for an independent third party to reproduce the data.
  • The supposed frequencies were derived by divination, literally clairvoyance.
  • Some devices claim to work over long distance, using scientific terms to appear legitimate. Again, this is deception. They are, in fact, a form of voodoo.
4
TestableHypothesis 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think I just paid $1800 for a half, butchered. That was about 350# of meat.

3
TestableHypothesis 3 points ago +3 / -0

What I would like to see is the dollar compared to a fattened steer, a bushel of wheat, a ton of iron ore, lumbar, et cetera. Things that were common and widely used long ago, and still are, and are minimally affected by technology changes.

1
TestableHypothesis 1 point ago +1 / -0

So much deception....
Sound vibrations are different than electromagnetic frequencies. Yes, there are demonstrations using sounds to kill cells, and there's radiation cancer treatment, but Rife has nothing on common with either. The Rife devices I've been around use something like a neon tube. That means the wavelength or wavelengths, and therefore the frequency, is fixed. The supposed frequency is produced by pulsing the electricity to the tube. This does not change the electromagnetic radiation.
Finally, claiming everything vibrates, has energy, or certain frequencies, is intended to confuse people. These are things that are taken out of context and misapplied, often to apply spiritual ramifications to otherwise understood physics.

2
TestableHypothesis 2 points ago +2 / -0

I recognize that homeopathic and oil remedies may have similar affects as drugs. And acupuncture/pressure for stimulating nerves, tissues, or metabolic pathways. For that I give them the benefit of the doubt.
Anything that claims to use energy, frequency, etc., is an avenue to occultism.
My biggest problem with Rife is that are no in-vitro demonstrations of it working, which should be very easy to do. Only placebo equivalent testimonials. The frequencies are not based on anything measurable.

1
TestableHypothesis 1 point ago +1 / -0

My assertion that they are demonic is not tied to them being ineffective.
But if you want to go that way, the same can be said for ouija boards, crystal balls, etc. It just means that IF it is effective, it is due to demonic forces. Which should cause concern.
I am also suggesting they are ineffective since the marketing and claims are openly deceptive.

2
TestableHypothesis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rife devices are a hoax, or worse, demonic. The frequencies indicated were determined by divination. Literally, Royal Rife claimed to be clairvoyant and thus could see the color of the energy of the cells.
There is also a Rife device which claims to be able to treat a person anywhere, regardless of proximity, by using quantum entanglement. Anyone with rudimentary knowledge of QE, understands what an absurd and BOGUS claim that is and recognizes the thing for what it is, a fancy VOODOO device.
Have nothing to do with Rife or with people who use it.

Keep in mind the demonic nature of these devices. Deception must be expected from the sellers. Here is a information from someone who has researched it.

https://healthandspirituality.info/energy-medicine/royal-rife-and-the-rife-machine/

2
TestableHypothesis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Work with like minded people so they can cover you or vice versa.

14
TestableHypothesis 14 points ago +14 / -0

This is a good reason to go. Counterintelligence. Find out what they focus on. For instance, they may tell everyone to go to a certain place and lock themselves in. Then later, when the real threat comes, it becomes easy for the agent to go there and cause mass carnage.
Also, stay armed for the next 3 months. It needs to be close, but not where someone would expect it. A lunchbox etc. Be careful that a change in behavior doesn't bring attention to yourself.

9
TestableHypothesis 9 points ago +9 / -0

To be fair, only UPS, Citi group, and Kroger are unexpected.
Outback has been lame for years. 600 jobs at Apple isn't even noticeable. Macy's and cinemas have been losing business for years. The rest are just the same numbers for different companies in different years.

1
TestableHypothesis 1 point ago +1 / -0

For those curious,
e^(-0.014x50) = 50%
Pureblood 30yo, living for 50 years, with annual mortality of 1.4%.
e^(-0.0189x35) = 52%
5 shots (1.4 * 1.35 = 1.89), living to 55yo.

1
TestableHypothesis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trying to make sense of the math...
Suppose 100 people out of 10,000 (1%) of a certain demographic (i.e. middle age men) died in 2021. This is saying that, in 2022, 107 would die if all had one Schwab Shot, and 135 deaths (1.35%) if they all had 5 shots?
But that is only one year, so the commenter is extrapolating that rate to every subsequent year, which is not supported... yet. While a pureblood cohort would expect to have 5,000 still alive at 80 years old, due to the (generally increasing) death rate, a cohort of sheep would be halved by age 55 due to the accelerated death rate.
Do I understand that correctly?

1
TestableHypothesis 1 point ago +1 / -0

@94f450d apologizes for not following closer,
I've heard fenbendazole can be bad for the liver, are you skipping a day or two every week? Or doing something else to heal the liver?

1
TestableHypothesis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like another flat earth theory that rants about perceived or projected flaws in the current understanding, but doesn't even attempt to provide an explanation for the known phenomenon.
Sounds like a CIA trap.
Ken Ham at least tries to offer other mechanisms to explain our observations.

2
TestableHypothesis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please explain like I took 3 shots of Jim Jones Juice for a donut.

And why I get sick if I'm around other people who are sick, except I don't when I take zinc lozenges. But if I swallow zinc pills, they don't stop me from getting sick.

10
TestableHypothesis 10 points ago +10 / -0

If you get an opening, mention that SIDS only happens to vaccinated children, and usually within days of a shot. Keep the ball rolling so they see how bad big farma has been and for how long. (Farma = injuring patients while treating them so that they will continue to be cash cows. )

1
TestableHypothesis 1 point ago +1 / -0

You titled your post "Don't ever forget Senator Liz Warren is responsible for giving the country Joe Biden". Warren was not responsible. The evil people in charge are. Warren was optics, that is, an almost plausible explanation. It would have made no difference if she did not even run. The leaders of the party openly admit they will get their way.
Quote all the numbers, ''FACTS'', you want, they are all fabricated to support the narrative. Just because they might be true, it doesn't matter.

2
TestableHypothesis 2 points ago +2 / -0

The first flaw of this analysis is that you assume demonrats are upstanding and honest. Once you realize that the people in charge do what they want, this whole analysis becomes about optics without admitting it's just optics.

11
TestableHypothesis 11 points ago +11 / -0

I've been saying for years, 8 weeks after you see the signs at the drug stores, everyone gets sick.
One year (circa 2006-2010), there was a shortage, so people were asked to not get the shot unless necessary. The flu season didn't materialize. Three months later they said they had enough shots and everyone should get it. Then the flu season hit.
I cattle rancher told me that they never had a problem with pink eye in the herd, but they decided to vaccinate for it the previous year, and 'good thing they did because they just had an outbreak.' ummm... Dumb dumb

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›