0
ThaDeplorablz 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's real.

If you believe it is fake you have to explain how the ENTIRE world have fallen for this, to the point that they are willing to destroy their national economies to fight it.

Also, Trump had it, so if you believe it is fake, you also believe that Trump lied about having it.

-1
ThaDeplorablz -1 points ago +2 / -3

OK, I can agree with pure shitposting like that being banned. I guess I just haven't seen much of it myself. Either way, how do you determine those who are LARPing shills from those who are proper anons with some wild theories?

19
ThaDeplorablz 19 points ago +19 / -0

Indeed. I am from Denmark.

0
ThaDeplorablz 0 points ago +1 / -1

Read it all.

Part of the time I was like "oh shit, this is it, this guy is legit".

At other times I was like "this guy is either LARPing or way off in lala-land".

Lets just say I want to see more evidence.

2
ThaDeplorablz 2 points ago +3 / -1

Not really sure what the big deal is, honestly. I hope it doesn't get to the place where people are afraid of discussing things. Remember that nobody here TRULY knows what is going on. People are theorizing. Some might be right on the money, others might be way way off. Doubt is justified. Critical thinking should be encouraged. People should be able to challenge wild claims and ask for evidence without being accused of being shills. That shit just turns people off. I'm sure some shills manage to pass themselves off as one of us, but so what? What kind of damage are they really doing by that?

1
ThaDeplorablz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, nobody should even get near this.

Also, I still don't think much of anything will happen.

6
ThaDeplorablz 6 points ago +6 / -0

Restrict freedoms for the “common good”. Geez, that sounds like a leftist argument.

4
ThaDeplorablz 4 points ago +4 / -0

That list of RINOs to be expelled is even just the beginning. The vast majority of GOP senators are just in it for themselves and cannot be trusted. The house is a bit better, but still pretty bad.

0
ThaDeplorablz 0 points ago +3 / -3

What? Are you saying that there was no election fraud?

2
ThaDeplorablz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Alex Jones admitted in court that he was a performance artist. He should never be trusted.

2
ThaDeplorablz 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’s right. Nobody would stand a chance. Infact, I don’t think any of the serious prospects would even attempt it. He would more or less clear the field.

1
ThaDeplorablz 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not sure what needs explaining. Trump has been promoting vaccines from day one and has mentioned vaccines coming "very soon" at probably every single rally he did during the 2020 campaign.

Trump is clearly pro-vaccines and I have no idea why some people here lure themselves into thinking that he is not.

3
ThaDeplorablz 3 points ago +5 / -2

I would put money on the latter being the case.

1
ThaDeplorablz 1 point ago +1 / -0

...or Biden is just returning to "normal" interventionist US foreign policy that Trump was trying to get away from with MAGA and America First. That seems like a much more plausible explanation to me than that this strike was somehow the work of Trump.

11
ThaDeplorablz 11 points ago +11 / -0

You should never feel too certain that you are right. That obscures critical thinking and we need critical thinkers!

There are a LOT of things that I am in doubt about and I'm not ashamed to admit it. A lot of this don't make sense to me and I am not about to jump to any premature conclusions. I THINK that there is a struggle going on, but how it is unfolding, I have no idea. Let's stay critical and gather evidence.

1
ThaDeplorablz 1 point ago +3 / -2

That makes no sense to me. Why would Trump order that attack?

0
ThaDeplorablz 0 points ago +1 / -1

You are not paying attention.

The number of registrered voters is IRRELEVANT in this context.

When voter participation rates are given they are given as a percentage of the total possible voter pool. This pool includes all registrered voters AND all voters who COULD obtain voter registration if they so wished to.

Also, I'm not being a jerk by pointing out factual errors. Too many well-meaning uncritically post stuff that is just factually incorrect at the most basic level. This is why so many people have a hard time taking us seriously and is a problem if we want to get through to more people.

6
ThaDeplorablz 6 points ago +8 / -2

IDK about that, fren.

"The longer he waits the better he'll look". You kinda make this sound like a Trump vanity project which it is not.

My take is that there is a real struggle going on and that the outcome of this struggle is far from certain. That's not dooming, that is just being realistic. You don't just defeat the deep state like that.

1
ThaDeplorablz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup, that's what I heard too. So I'm not really sure what the fuss is all about.

0
ThaDeplorablz 0 points ago +2 / -2

So much wrong info in the posts in this thread.

Voter participation rates are given as a percentage, NOT of registrered voters, NOT of the total population, but of the total number of ELIGIBLE voters, i.e. people of voting age.

Around 239 million americans were eligible to vote in the 2020 election.

About 66,1% of those people actually voted, or roughly 158 million votes.

Of those votes, the "official" count is:

Joe Biden: 81,268,924 votes

Donald Trump: 74,216,154 votes

Jo Jorgensen: 1,865,724 votes

Howie Hawkins: 405,035 votes

Other: 627,566

Do with that what you will, but the info in the OP is just blatantly false and just make people posting it look foolish.

1
ThaDeplorablz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sensible post. I agree.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›