Could you please relay to the rest of us what God's orders are specifically?

Shun the disbeliever.

In a 24 word post he used the words "Jack" and "Monday" which is undeniable proof that Q knew more than 3 years before it happened that Jack Dorset would resign from Twitter on a Monday. Is that not proof enough for you?

It has the word "Jack" and the word "Monday" in it. What are the chances that it would include those 2 words out of 24 and more than 3 years later Jack Dorsey resigns as CEO of Twitter on a Monday?!? Surely this is inarguable proof that Q knows all and that there are no coincidences.

In my experience when being anal probed using "Jesus" as a safe word doesn't work at all.

I predict that the virus will mutate sometime in the future and that the WHO will designate the variation with a letter from the Greek alphabet. I also predict that the Sun will rise tomorrow morning in the East.

Rapefugees

Lee Harvey Oswald = LHO = OHL = Holy

I know that this will upset a lot of people on here, but maybe it was this piece of shit trying to flee the cops after an incident and not a deliberate pre-meditated attack?

Check out this video showing the sequence of the incident:

Video https://leakedreality.com/video/27531/waukesha-christmas-parade-massacre

Look at 0:20. He misses the easy to hit kid in pink standing on the road and drives down the gap to the right of the marchers next to the crowd instead of veering into either group. Then at 0:45 he slows down and swerves to the left and tries to drive through the gap between the crowd and the marching band instead of driving through either of them at top speed which would cause the most casualties. Again at 1:20 he drives through the gap and nearly hits the other car and not into the crowd on the road to his right.

If you were going to mount a pre-planned terrorist attack why would you be getting involved in a domestic disturbance beforehand and getting the cops involved and chasing you? Why would you be driving your vehicle in the areas of the road clear of or with the fewest amount of people that could be hit and not aiming for the central body mass of the marchers?

The timing and location after the Rittenhouse verdict is suspect, but maybe this was just some worthless criminal junkie on bail, off his head on drugs and who didn't give a shit about any victims he ran over while trying to get away from the cops, but who wasn't deliberately trying to kill as many people as possible?

President Trump at a rally in Alabama in August 2021: "I recommend taking the vaccines. I did it, it’s good, take the vaccines." He also fast-tracked the vaccine rollout with Operation Warp Speed while president.

Does that make Trump a "facilitator" or just a "gullible follower" and by your logic is it time for him to be killed for the crime of "genocide"?

How many multi-billion dollar lawsuits can Fox News and OAN afford from Dominion?

President Trump's public statements on the vaccines:

"Well, I got the Pfizer and I would have been very happy with any of them."

“The vaccines do work, and they are effective."

"I love our people, so I want our people to take the vaccines."

"I recommend taking the vaccines. I did it, it’s good, take the vaccines."

So when President Trump said those things on the public record was he telling lies or speaking the truth?

Fuck, that is some ugly looking freaks.

If its a movie when will the intermission take place? I really need to pee.

Trump fast-tracked the vaccine rollout with Operation Warp Speed, publicly said he took the Pfizer vaccine and would "have been very happy with any of them" and said unequivocally "I recommend taking the vaccines. I did it, it’s good, take the vaccines."

BUT

President Trump who is beloved of his followers for "telling it like it is" is actually deceiving us instead by speeding up the vaccine rollout, telling us he has been vaccinated himself and urging us to get vaccinated because he actually doesn't want us to follow his example by getting the jab nor listen to his clear and unambiguous advice to "take the vaccines"?

He's getting the jab himself and urging us to do so as well because he doesn't want us to do it?

Are you sure you're not confusing "deception" with "self-delusion"?

You are stupid x infinity + 1.

Why is the city liable? Maybe they should sue the SUV manufacturer?

That was a misquote by Admiral Yamamoto. He never envisaged that the Empire of Japan could win a long war of attrition with the United States and they would be dictating the terms of surrender in the White House. What he meant was that if Japan did declare war on the United States at Pearl Harbor the Americans would fight until the end and that the only way the war could end in Japan's favor would be in the extremely unlikely scenario that Japan had captured the continental United States and that America had not other choice apart from a dictated surrender as they no longer had the means to continue the war. Therefore I would say that those who believe in this statement are historically ignorant.

President Trump's public statement on the vaccines:

"Well, I got the Pfizer and I would have been very happy with any of them."

“The vaccines do work, and they are effective."

"I love our people, so I want our people to take the vaccines."

"I recommend taking the vaccines. I did it, it’s good, take the vaccines."

Yep, sure does sound like he thinks the vaccines are unsafe and he's encouraging his supporters and the American people not to take them.

The cabal murdered him for opposing the vaccine but created a fake suicide note documenting his opposition to the vaccine? I guess either these people or you are stupid.

Your reply about comms told me the "what" when I already know basically what comms are and I was asking for help with the "why". If that's the best support I can get from this community then surely I will need "luck" to understand.

If you want to "help" all you have to do is answer the basic question that I've asked twice now:

"Why go to all that trouble to communicate with each other when simpler, more secure and less revealing methods must surely be available to them?"

So the scenarios are:

1. The plane did crash and it was arranged by the cabal because creating an elaborate conspiracy to slam a $200 million dollar fighter plane into the ocean that at the very minimum would have required the active cooperation of large members of the UK defence forces because this was the best way to inform each other that Queen Elizabeth II had died. These people are the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world who have had experience lurking in the shadows for millennia and can control governments, the weather and create earthquakes but the best way to let each other know the latest news is not to use their well established network of agents or encrypted communications but fake plane crashes.

2. The plane didn't crash and it was an even more elaborate operation to create the appearance of a crash that could potentially be disproved later because the crash never occurred and the British military would be surplus one active operational fighter jet. This even harder to mount scenario was preferable to sending each other encrypted communications despite all their wealth, power, advanced technology and experience in clandestine operations.

3. A fighter jet based on an aircraft carrier named after Queen Elizabeth I crashed and had nothing to do with the supposed death of Queen Elizabeth II who has subsequently made a public appearance.

You still haven't answered the basic question I asked before: Why go to all that trouble to communicate with each other when surely simpler, more secure and less revealing methods must surely be available to them?

I'm really struggling to understand "comms".

I'm new here and I don't understand about the plane crash part. Are you saying that they crashed a $200m fighter plane deliberately to send some sort of message? Or that the story about the plane crash is fake? What would be the point? If they're trying to keep her death secret as it appears it might be then why crash planes to reveal publicly their secret plans to conceal her death? Or if they are sending an internal message to each other then the wealthiest and most powerful people in the world have no more efficient message of communicating with each other than slamming jet fighters into the ocean? I really don't get "comms". Could someone please explain?