I'm not a lawfag, but I do know what the word "request" means. It's a start, of a sort, I suppose.
Because an X post is not a source, here is the real source: https://substack.com/home/post/p-160954253?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
This is almost good enough copy that could be copied and pasted onto a normie feed like Spergbook to redpill them there.
White hats and patriots may be in charge but we should all remember that there are elements of the deep state that run very very deep indeed and that this is not a swift operation, as we'd all like it to be. I know I fall into that camp that gets tired of seeing my world around me burn while the satanic freaks have their fun and the devious politicians line their pockets.
Trump is a man, and so are the patriots around him, and men make mistakes. Simple as.
It would be best if you or anyone in this thread could post some examples of what you're talking about when you say that you've seen this being done live in congressional sessions or elsewhere.
I, too, recall seeing one of these types of videos a while back but I could not now find it if I needed to, nor how to even search for it.
Can anyone post sources on any videos of this actually happening?
Q said 4-6% lost forever but it feels to me more like we need to put a 1 or a 2 in front of those numbers to make them 14 to 16% or perhaps 24 to 26%, yes. I don't know. Maybe there's a lot of silent supporters out there, too. I know the Legacy Media plays this up, but I only wanted the community to see this so that we know that there are people like this still out there. It's not an overnight fight; we're in this for the long haul.
Are you on LinkedIn? All it's been there lately is Orange Man Bad! And Musk the Nazi. Perhaps because I'm more in a circle of federal employees, but all it seems lately is Doge cuts, etc.
What happened to releasing the Epstein client list?
Seems like a helluva lot more than 4-6% to me. Simply observing.
36 million viewers for Trump speech? Sounds low. What's the sauce? If it's from the Legacy Media, I'll bet the real numbers are twice that much. Reason: I quit cable 10 years ago or so, but I have a smart TV so I get the "live" channels. I was watching Trump's speech on the Fox News Live alternative, and at the peak they showed 1.9 million viewers. I'll bet another several million more were watching on platforms like X, YouTube, etc etc.
Something seems off about this. Anyone have a real source for such a claim?
Nice find. Thanks for posting. So at the end of this guy's tweet he writes:
He knows everything. Don't be naive.
So if nothing happens regarding this Las Vegas incident, then Patel is protecting those people. Is that what we're to think? Or, if nothing happens, we're supposed to believe that all of the justice that needs to be served to this sick people is being done in the background, never to see the light of day?
So what you're saying is...Two more weeks?
Explore more of his posts, too. Short and too the point. He's definitely in our camp.
My opinion of Bannon just dropped several levels:
Former Donald Trump adviser Steve Bannon pleaded guilty in New York state court on Tuesday to a fraud charge related to his fundraising campaign for the U.S. president's wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. At a hearing, Bannon, 71, pleaded guilty to one count for scheme to defraud. He was immediately sentenced to three years of conditional release, avoiding jail time. Bannon was charged with money laundering and conspiracy, and accused of deceiving donors in 2019 who contributed more than $15 million to a private fundraising drive, known as "We Build the Wall," during Trump's first term in the White House. As part of his sentence, Bannon is barred from serving on a New York nonprofit for three years and prohibited from using or selling donor data obtained as part of the scheme. Bannon had previously pleaded not guilty and was scheduled to stand trial in March, under an indictment brought by the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. Bannon did not address the court aside from entering the plea and confirming he understood his rights. Addressing reporters outside the courthouse, Bannon did not mention his own case but attacked Bragg and New York Attorney General Letitia James, saying they were “existential threats” to the Trump administration. “I’m calling on right now the attorney general, Pam Bondi, to begin an immediate criminal investigation into Letitia James, Alvin Bragg, all of what they did to President Trump,” Bannon said. James was not involved in Bannon’s case but previously sued Trump for civil fraud and won a nearly half-billion dollar judgment against him. Trump has denied wrongdoing and is appealing. Construction of a border wall was a key element of Trump's immigration policies during his first presidency, supported by his fellow Republicans but opposed by immigrant advocacy groups. The indictment said Bannon promised donors that all their money would go toward building Trump's wall, but concealed his role in diverting hundreds of thousands of dollars to the drive's chief executive Brian Kolfage, a decorated U.S. Air Force veteran who had promised to take no salary. Kolfage pleaded guilty in April 2022 to federal fraud and tax charges, and is serving a 4-1/4-year prison sentence.
Just because you don't know about it doesn't mean it's not real.
That's fine. Let me be clear: There are guidelines in place at federal agencies regarding government information, and part of those guidelines include securing information, including via email.
Awesome. Legit CIA folks placed in USAID.
The Legacy Media is such Mossad/CIA shit.
They can hide because they're all in on it together. That's one of the problems with this gambit by Trump and team.
The "good and talented federal workers" are really quite rare. It is a culture of waste and ineptitude.
t. former federal contractor
"Fork in the Road"
BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
Your fed friend took a big risk sending this to you, then, if they did that. All federal workers know that their computers are monitored, including incoming and outgoing emails, and thumb drives (to download any files). Please thank your friend for doing this.
Service to a government (a public organ whose purpose is to serve the public) is necessarily different from private sector work.
In my experience, they are vastly different.
It's maybe 60-70% dead wood, though. That will be a problem.
It makes sense for those of us who understand that liberalism is a mental disorder.
A good place to start your journey of enlightenment is Haidt's book The Righteous Mind. He's a self-professed Jewish liberal, so that's the lens through which he conducts his studies and writes his book. So use that as you read it. He unwittingly exposes the Grand Canyon-like differences between "right" and "left" through his sociological studies, and also exposes his own blindness.