7
Thereddestpill 7 points ago +8 / -1

These numerology delta posts do nothing but discredit those that post them. When the post does not die, will this become an anti-proof? Look at the comments here. You don't don't need external forces to divide you. You are all doing it yourselves with petty arguments about which religion right, religious iconography you don't understand, and beliefs that are demonstrably false. The catholic church travels all over the world giving people Bibles. Yes they are corrupt organization filled to the gills with child molesters, but they did not ban bibles. If you are wrong about some of this shit it makes it easy for the enemy to say you are wrong about all of it. Be less wrong.

1
Thereddestpill 1 point ago +2 / -1

Read the twelfth amendment. Then come back and state where Pence would have the constitutional authority to reject anything. Everyone can keep repeating that the veep has that power but does not make it so. Name the amendment, statute, or procedure that would have given pence that power or stop claiming it could just because that’s what you wanted to happen. I believe he wanted to reject and the lawyers and the sc told him it wouldn’t stand. Doing what he did ended him politically.

3
Thereddestpill 3 points ago +4 / -1

Careful now. Questioning he who wears fingerless gloves will get you labeled a shill. CM is a larper who is going to drip drip drip his evidence wrapped up in vaguely Q sounding riddles.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-1
Thereddestpill -1 points ago +2 / -3

Cm really did overhype this. If anything he helped dominion by showing the network settings as off and inaccessible to the election staff. There is nothing in the video that is extraordinary to anyone who knows the slightest bit about IT practices. I cannot fathom why people still glom onto CM after everything that has transpired. It’s plainly obvious that if he was q before, he sure is trying to be now.

-1
Thereddestpill -1 points ago +1 / -2

Quantum computing from those public tech companies is being bought out by the military or is heavily funded by DARPA. This is an area in which I have a bit of expertise. I have read the art of war and understand a fair bit about psychology. People are pattern recognition machines. Linking packet to pcap seems like a coincidence. Ands that’s all it is. If q knew that, they knew the outcome of the election years ahead. You don’t have to say it’s magic. Making that kind of prediction would be magic. I understand the math and physics behind quantum computation. I have been in the same room as a quantum computer. I know what research is going on right now in the field and I know the people who are at the tippy top the field too.

If you have a basic understanding of the math and physics of QM then you would dismiss this just as I have.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +4 / -9
-2
Thereddestpill -2 points ago +1 / -3

Yeah…2020 Q said that. Meanwhile in 2018

https://qalerts.app/?n=2598

Just saying plenty of believers called it qanon and still do. Of course there are paytriots and others who have just latched on to the word, all I’m saying is that it came from the movement.

-3
Thereddestpill -3 points ago +1 / -4

The term qanon came from within the community. Content creators use it. It’s on bumper stickers, t-shirts, and coffee cups. I have seen it on a child’s onesie. It might be popular now to updoot every “what’s a qanon” post to feel clever but that’s you just making a straw man to run away from. I’ve been around long enough to remember when it wasn’t a dirty word.

1
Thereddestpill 1 point ago +2 / -1

Because Pence didn’t have the power to reject the votes. The Congress and Senate could have rejected votes and there is a scenario where Pence could have become the president with Trump as his VP. Read the twelfth amendment.

0
Thereddestpill 0 points ago +1 / -1

Anyone can read the 12th amendment. The Vice President does not have the power to reject the votes. He only gets power in the event that both houses of Congress cannot agree. Then he becomes president. If Pence had the power you think he has, that means Al Gore had the same power and just decided to “let” Bush become president when he himself believed he won Florida. If you cannot be bothered to read the constitution, then you have no idea what you are fighting for.

-1
Thereddestpill -1 points ago +1 / -2

I wasn’t saying anyone should call him president. I know it seems like a hundred years ago but there were a great number of people on the left who refused to acknowledge DJT as the president, and that did nothing to change reality. All I’m saying is that it might make one feel better to say xiden ain’t the president and has no power and that’s a trap. If you think he has no power then we don’t have anything at all to worry about.

-1
Thereddestpill -1 points ago +1 / -2

Whatever the fraud, Biden was installed as president the same way as every other president. Defeating an imaginary version of Biden might make you feel better but it won’t change anything in reality. Sure does seem like he’s issuing executive orders and running the government at the moment. Those are real things that will need to be undone. Everyone used to claim he wasn’t using air force one but he is. Deciding not to capitalize his name or call him president is a toothless gesture at best.

1
Thereddestpill 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is a first time for everything but sadly what happens is that people get their hopes up based on these claims. Most of the time these claims are being made by people who don’t posses an understanding of how our government works beyond government is corrupt. MTG is out there telling her supporters that getting AZ overturned is not happening. There are remedies but the viable remedies ain’t coming until 2022 and 2024. Be prepared for a long fight.

by BQnita
1
Thereddestpill 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. It never was his land and he himself has never made that claim.

1954

■ Cliven’s father, David Ammon Bundy, begins grazing cattle with his 8-year-old son on the Bunkerville allotment near the farm he purchased in 1949. Cliven’s mother, Bodel Jensen Bundy, had homesteaded land near Mesquite. David and Bodel Bundy had moved their family from Mount Trumbull, Ariz., where David was born in 1922.

1973

■ Cliven Bundy pays grazing fees to the BLM for the next 20 years.

1993

■ The BLM modifies Bundy’s grazing permit by reducing the size allowed for his herd to 150 and restricts where his cattle can graze in the Gold Butte area. He refuses the permit and stops paying grazing fees. The BLM cancels his permit.

It was always “public” land. The dispute was about federal authority over land in the state of Nevada.

by BQnita
2
Thereddestpill 2 points ago +2 / -0

They threatened to seize his cattle for illegal grazing without a permit and showed up in force to try and do that. It escalated into a standoff from there.

1
Thereddestpill 1 point ago +1 / -0

They can do a recall but there is not a legal undo button after the results have been certified. The window for that was before certification. I’m not equivocating fraud with general dissatisfaction but the mechanisms are the same. If you could recall electors for any reason, then you can bet we would have seen this before in history. If this were an option you can be sure that the dems would have tried to use it for hrc

1
Thereddestpill 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no legal mechanism to decertify electors or undo an election. If there were, people would have used this in the past if a politician failed to deliver on promises made.

by BQnita
10
Thereddestpill 10 points ago +12 / -2

It wasn’t his land. The dispute was over the government changing the rules about grazing cattle on public land. He refused to pay the federal government and it escalated from there.

-1
Thereddestpill -1 points ago +1 / -2

If you listen to the hearing these could be any or all of the votes on Election Day from on demand printing of ballots. The big problem is with the mail in vote, throwing out all of these in person ballots would impact DJT more than Xiden.

2
Thereddestpill 2 points ago +3 / -1

These cars were from an on demand car service that was put out of business by competition from uber. Nothing to do with batteries failing. Just google France Bluecar.

0
Thereddestpill 0 points ago +1 / -1

I never said that religion should be barred from everyday life. You are just repeating stuff you read in a chain letter with the bit about removing crosses from a veterans cemetery. Nobody is asking for that lol. The second part of the establishment clause is about people. The first part is about the government. Barring the government from establishing a religion is exactly what makes freedom of and from religion. Would you accept a state sponsored religion that was different from the one you practiced? What if the majority in this country moves from Christianity to something else? Will you just throw your hands up and say "Oh Well, Freedom of Religion NOT Freedom From Religion"? That is entirely the point. The government does not get to pick your religion. This has nothing to do with what you pick for yourself.

0
Thereddestpill 0 points ago +1 / -1

You cannot have freedom of religion without freedom from religion. It's very simple. If the government can take a vote tomorrow and decide that the state religion is Islam and we are now going to follow Sharia Law, then you don't have freedom of religion. That was exactly the intent of the founders. They didn't want government in their church and they didn't want your church in their government.

view more: Next ›