1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

We’re seeing that happen in the polls.

Not quite as satisfactory as your solution, but I’ll take it.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cheers.

I had to listen to it a second time myself.

14
War_Hamster 14 points ago +14 / -0

Someone pointed out elsewhere that he was using the CO attorney's hypothetical where he was arguing that Trump stopped being POTUS the moment J6 happened.

Never mind that he was acquitted of "insurrection" in the impeachment trial and has never been charged under 2380.

This clown was actually arguing that they could just arbitrarily declare an insurrection based on the J6 Committee Report, with no ability for Trump to defend himself.

SCOTUS should refer him to the BAR Association for violation of the 6th Amendment.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Perry Mason couldn't successfully argue this case, but Murray did suck.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thought y'all might appreciate this conversation over here on GAW.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

The interruptions don't bother me. I like the interaction, but I will ask them to raise hands going forward.

We have a YouTube class every Tuesday at 3 PM PST:

https://www.youtube.com/@MrConstitutionClasses/streams

The show I really like is on Sundays at 5 PM PST, on Patriot Soapbox where we are going through the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers:

https://dlive.tv/PSB

Thanks for your interest.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I appreciate the question. We get that a lot. We find most lawyers don't know diddly squat about the Constitution. It's really not taught in law school.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed on both.

But there may be fixes that don't require kinetic action. This is what I'm aiming for in this video.

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

I help teach several Constitution classes per week, both online and in person.

I don't have any professional credentials on this topic (I'm an econ/finance guy), but have been studying this stuff for years.

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks.

I stay in touch with the Fringe guys and am glad they're doing well.

7
War_Hamster 7 points ago +7 / -0

He's seemed to be a bit off-message.

Not sure what he's up to.

11
War_Hamster 11 points ago +11 / -0

Is this the general consensus over here on GAW?

Over on PDW people are starting to tell Trump to STFU.

Personally, I'm enjoying seeing the system actually work. Voting party line is how we got into this mess.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is outstanding. Thanks for sharing.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm talking about the bigger picture. GME is but another chink in their armor. Sooner or later, all of these chinks are going to expose the whole thing.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except we're the ones trying to break the dam. Reverse your analogy and we're onto something.

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think what you're missing is the volume factor.

WSB was able to target a single stock that was vulnerable.

That is much different than creating stress in multi-trillion dollar markets where the rules are in place to protect the status quo.

We The People will never have the volume to impact that. The implosion has to come from within, which it will. It will because the system was always designed to implode.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lindsey Graham deserves mention, because he's still in the closet. When he comes out it's going to be entertaining.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Many thanks. You've made my evening, as I wanted to get away from research and such. Need a break.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is that supposed to have a link to watch the movie?

It took me to some odd sites that were loading slowly.

view more: Next ›