Or........
It could be a massive scare tactic to have forced the steal.
Just consider that it could be the case.
I have a feeling there are going to be a lot less trails than people think and potentially a lot more Al Qaeda justice served that people realize.
Going to be biblical does not mean this is going to be as peaceful as people believe.
Again, stop thinking in terms of law enforcement and start thinking in terms of how does our military handle enemies on the battlefield.
How many members of Al Qaeda were arrested?
How did our brave men and women in uniform handle Al Qaeda when they met them on the battlefield?
Read my reference above.
Remember, in times of war traitors are not American citizens, they are enemy combatants.
Put simply, our military is NOT a substitute for law enforcement. Our military in engaged to DESTROY our enemy.
This is the whole crux of the series I posted. We have hoped for them to step in an fill the role of a corrupt and failed federal law enforcement. That is not their role. If and when they step in, it will be to obliterate the enemies of the US.
This is NOT going to go down as people thought it would.
I am just going to leave a wild guess here. No inside knowledge is acknowledged.
-
Obama visited China in 2017. Q pointed this out and asked what would he be doing?
-
Less than two months later, Fauci (aka Dr. I am going to be executed by firing squad) says Trump is going to face a major pandemic.
-
In 2020, Trump faces a major pandemic.
Hmmm. I wonder who the CCP and which domestic actor would be implicated? I wonder who might claim, in the end, they are a citizen of another county so they can try to say they didn't commit treason since they are not a citizen of the US?
I wonder if that same person, coordinated with that same country, to also steal the 2020 Presidential Election?
Again, this is just a wild ass guess on my part but let's see what happens over the next few months shall we?
Hmmm, I wonder if in the next 60 days, some information might "leak" regarding the AIDS genocide....
WWG1WGA!
A difference between the Federal Government and it's laws.
If the military took over the Federal Government temporarily, the Constitution and laws would still stand - just under the jurisdiction of the military.
Then the States will need to meet and decide what to do. Under the Law of War manual the US Military is to hold control until a legal government can be re-established. With the removal of the Federal Government, that decision would then fall to the States in a Constitutional Convention.
I believe they would clarify some language in the Constitution (such as the commerce clause the Feds used to exponentially expand their power), add actual voting processes in it (and the states that would oppose this do not have enough votes to stop it), set term limits, and set up a separate federal law enforcement NOT answerable to the Feds but to the States collectively, and make judges voted in, not appointed. There could be a few other things but the point being, the States would reform the Federal Government so that they were subservient to the States again.
While some of the above is conjecture on my part, it makes sense that we have seen how badly the Feds have twisted the intent of the Constitution to continually seize power. Give the States the opportunity to "tighten" the language in the Constitution and we could be in a much better position moving forward.
If what was said to me transpires, what will first happen is the awakening that the virus was a planned bio-logical attack.
Then will be the domestic actors involved in that attack.
Then will be the steal of the elections thereby making all those involved enemies of the US.
Bear in mind one other point. Only Congress can declare war. But what happens if it is proven Congress is acting on behalf of a foreign power who is conducting war against us?
What gives the military the authority to go to war without the approval of Congress?
The answer to the above is an attack on US soil directly as that is already considered a declaration of war by a foreign county. Would a bio-logical attack on US soil not meet that criteria.
Simply put, I asked in my posts what would get the military involved. We just need a few more things to play out and they will have no choice but to get involved.
Yes, I have in fact read the RAND manual on counter-insurgency.
Notice one of the biggest fail points shown is to "crush them" produced the least likely scenario of success. The reason being is if that is done too soon the remainder of the enemy will simply go underground and wait for the right time again to strike.
The most important aspect of a successful counter-insurgency was to identify all the actors. To make them commit to an action so big, they had to deploy (and therefore identify) all assets - so then they could ALL be taken out.
Sound familiar? Is that not what actually has happened? They made all these traitors and foreign interests commit to an action so large (stealing the 2020 Presidential election) that they had to deploy all assets.
It is no coincidence when Q said "All assets deployed".
Now they are exposed and there is no going back. They have committed to an action of which there is no escape. Some have suggested Biden will just pardon them, but only a legitimate President can issue a pardon.
They are all rats in a trap at this point. They were permitted to succeed with their plans over the last four years.
One last thing - they also know is was Obama in concert with the CCP that planned this whole thing and released this bio-weapon on the world. Remember Obama's visit to China in 2017? Remember Q asking us what was Obama doing going to China right after the sitting POTUS (which, BTW, was also a violation of the Hatch Act). Remember Q saying Obama will claim to be a citizen of Kenya before this was over? Why would he do that? Because he will try to escape treason charges.
All of this will be coming out over the coming months. I personally believe it is going to be a very hot summer in the US.
The US Military is not stupid. If the scenario I painted comes to pass, the UN will not be able to recognize the DC Government as a legitimate government that can make that call in the first place.
Secondly, one of the biggest deterrents for deploying foreign troops to US soil or invading the US has always been the sheer volume of armed citizens. If the UN were deployed on US soil against our own military, our military may suddenly find themselves with tens of millions of partisans fighting along side them.
The thing is, we still have to reach the precipice before this happens. I believe once it is revealed the virus was an intentional bio-weapon release and some domestic actors (such as Dr. Fauci), were involved in it coupled with the real information of fraud found in audits, we will have reached that point.
Thank you. I am just trying to share with fellow Patriots things I have learned to try and help people to keep pushing and have hope - especially when things appear to be so lost at the moment.
Rest assured, justice will be coming for these traitors, but it will not come in drips and drabs. When it comes, it will come fast and hard for them. So much so, they one could say it was biblical.
They could. But I believe the more likely outcome is "adjustments" will be made based on learning over the last hundred or so years. I believe they will "de-tooth" a new Federal Government.
More importantly, if the military does assume control temporarily until the American People can re-assert our power, it will most likely mean the elections for new candidates to do this will fall under military control.
Remember how many times Q asked if the Dems would survive?
No. They really believe the masses are not much better than sheep. Q told us as much.
Look how they were able to get the American population to mask up. People took politicians (i.e., people known to lie for a living) and trusted them over doctors. People couldn't be bothered to take five minutes to do a little research to see that the masks do NOTHING and push back.
2020 emboldened them that the American public has been sufficiently dumbed down they can finally seize the country.
Boy do they have a surprise coming!
Thanks for your comment. Technically you are completely correct that the representatives of THE PEOPLE ratified the Constitution.
When you list the hierarchy, that is the most important part of your comment because the modern day Feds would have us believe it is the federal government, the states and then the people and that God is an individual preference we should not force on people.
A more simple answer of "What permits the Federal Government to hold it's power? is this, the same as it every was, the control of force.
But if tomorrow, all 50 states decided to leave the current US and form a new one, exactly how much "force" would the Feds in their little territory of DC control?
That was one of the ingenious approaches our Founding Fathers put forth on in this country - that the States, and therefore the people at a more local level, could strip a corrupt government of it's military might. Don't know if this is the case, but I believe they were taking this lesson from a certain king who threw around his red-coated troops to enact his decrees. One Boston Massacre comes to mind.
I am not being cryptic and I definitely don't know how this ends. In the last post, which I just made, I just explain a scenario that was discussed with me which is much more than arrests and trials.
While Trump did mention them, the earlier posts I made were also to take into consideration that some of this might have been said to scare the enemy into taking a course of action they wanted. It is not unheard of in letting people commit certain crimes, where a sting has been set up, to literally catch them red handed.
No, I do not expect everyone to simply be a shooting gallery. Yes, I expect a lot of them will be arrested. But know one knows, even Q, how they are going to react when that moment comes.
Think in this example....
A criminal is caught dead to rights in a crime that will most likely see them get the death penalty (let's say it was for murdering multiple people).
Law enforcement shows up on that person's doorstep to arrest him. He knows if he is arrested he will face the death penalty.
So he decides to fight with everything he has and take a few of them with him until he is finally killed by law enforcement.
Now apply it to this....
You've worked a plan for decades to bring down a country. You've bought off a ton of traitors in that county who are actively working to destroy their own country.
Now law enforcement shows up and you know, based on the crimes committed, you are going to be put to death. To you just sit back and let it happen or do you fight?
I am not contradicting myself at all. In fact, that was the point of this whole series. We, in the Q community, keep thinking this will end in arrests. They will finally get the justice coming to them. But we need to consider that these people are going to fight, and fight hard, when that moment arrives to keep this from happening.
What I am saying, is what we think is going to happen is most likely NOT what is going to happen should the military get involved.
From the beginning (in my first post) I have said this is one way it could play out. I was never told this is definitely the plan but I said it was a plausible explanation. However, what I was told is, if it goes down militarily, it is not going to go the way most in the Q community have thought. We have been so focused on justice being served we have forgotten this is not what the military is used for and, most likely, will not be how they are used should it come to that.
The main point leading to tomorrow and emphasized in your response. The Q community has long discussed tribunals and arrests because, as my post points out, the Feds are NOT going to arrest themselves (I suggested the exact opposite of what you said). That was the whole point at the beginning. What I was pointing out is the military is NOT going to be engaged for arrests.
Be aware, once exposed and targeted, the cabal is not just going to sit back and let them all be rounded up for trials. They are going to fight with their dying breath to keep it from happening. This is NOT going to be a law enforcement exercise, it will be an outright war.
Q did tell us what needed to happen for 11.3 to be triggered and the military to get involved. What I was told fell exactly into line with this.
But here is where people need to start thinking differently. How would the US Military react if a foreign power had invaded our soil? Would they be arresting them? Would they be trying to keep many of them from harm to save them for trial?
Q has said the end is not going to be for everybody for good reason. This is not going to be a simple clean up operation conducted by the US military. We need to be prepared for that.
As for the DOJ, have we not lived through Sessions, Huber, Barr and now Durham? Have you considered that Q has been pointing them out so you pay attention to the abject failure of the law enforcement that is supposed to be arresting and locking up these traitors? Do you really think it takes FIVE solid years of investigations before you have enough to round these people up? We heard Huber, Huber, Huber, in the beginning only to have Huber show up one day and say, "I got nothing." We heard Trust Sessions, only to have Sessions forced out at the end of mid-terms and President Trump go against him when he ran for Senate again. We heard Barr is coming, only for Barr to do nothing, ignore the blatant violations of the 14th Amendment during the pandemic and even go so far as to say they had seen no evidence of voter fraud - despite the overwhelming number of sworn affidavits that were happening nationwide. So I ask you, after witnessing all that, what would lead anyone to believe Durham is suddenly going to come to the rescue?
This is why the earlier posts. Consider that Q pointing out the DOJ constantly may have been for two other purposes than most believe. It may have been to draw our attention to the complete failure and corruption of our law enforcement and judicial branches. Secondly, and more importantly, it may have also been used to keep the traitors scared that justice was coming so they would get desperate and expose themselves and go so far as to commit the biggest crime in history in the last election - which they did in spades.
I was going to elaborate on this more in Part V, but this is a great question.
There is no military that belongs to the Federal Government at all (and this was an ingenious part of our nation's design). The provide the coordination of the military that is all.
Let me explain further. If tomorrow, all of the States got together and said they had enough of the Federal abuses and were forming a new pact of states to protect the rights of the people - who would all the soldiers in those states suddenly belong to? If Texas were to leave the union, who is the CiC from these soldiers from Texas now?
You see, the Feds have their own little oasis free from state control. But they also have no military at all. The men and women of the military belong to their respective states and are "lent" to the Feds to be coordinated for the common defense as long as the State remains a part of the United States.
Bear in mind also that, prior to WWII, the US did not having an active and standing military - just a small contingent in case of invasion. This was the big warning Eisenhower gave us about the MIC with the change in direction following WWII.
To the second part of your question, look no further than the Civil War. The Confederate States left the union yet they were able to coordinate and fight just fine. In fact, in the earlier stages of the war, they were winning more battles than the union. Grant's military genius is what turned things around for the North. However, history lesson aside, the Confederation showed during this period that the States could work together WITHOUT the Federal Government just fine.
Even wondered why, over the last couple of years, the Feds have placed so much emphasis on removing any references to the Confederation.? It was a period in American History that proved a group of states could function together without the need for a Federal Government.
The Feds primary purpose for existence to to protect our rights enshrined in the Constitution.
Based on how the rights of citizens were trampled by Governors and other state officials what should have happened was their removal via the 14th Amendment, Clause 3 or 18 USC 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law. In some cases, (Michigan, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and California) this also reached the level of third-degree murder.
Q posed the question regarding these and asked is the DOJ coming. Q was pointing us to the failure point here. The same failure point that allows the Federal Government to run amok with no recourse or regard for the Constitution.
The idea behind the Constitution was that the Feds would hold the States in check and the States would hold the Feds in check.
They NEEDED the House to be stolen in 2018. Notice Q mentioned the Senate was they key.
How they did things in 2018 for the House provided a lot of intelligence for the trap laid in 2020.
I will say this, though I know it is sometimes hard to hear with the time that passes, "Trust the Plan." What is coming in much, much bigger that anyone imagined. (Hmmm, I think Q even said this).