0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nice straw man. The article doesn't claim it's recommended, it says that there's a study that shows effectiveness and that NIH is evaluating it.

Reading comprehension is a good thing.

1
anon82059 1 point ago +2 / -1

And this is why, in spite of the warnings of the nation's founders, we will always trend toward two major political parties. New ones may supplant old ones, but we will always settle back to two.

3
anon82059 3 points ago +4 / -1

The narrative is already shifting to blame Trump.

6
anon82059 6 points ago +7 / -1

The cat's name is Chew Chew

3
anon82059 3 points ago +4 / -1

This is garbage, the nerve endings in the foreskin are just like any other piece of skin. (Source: am subject matter expert) The nerves responsible for sexual pleasure are almost exclusively in the head of the penis.

Those nerve endings can get desensitized over years of constant stimulation as happens when rubbing against cloth.

I have no problem with getting rid of the practice, but let's get our facts straight.

14
anon82059 14 points ago +15 / -1

Won't work. I saw him right away without the needles or condoms.

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

Which forest am I in then? The celibate seeker-of-Jesus forest? I rather like it.

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oh, so you've been to our parties. You get a little smashed and enjoy a bit of action? Most homophobes have, they hate themselves for it and take it out on TEH GHEYS.

I'm boring to you because you're trying to troll me into anger and failing miserably. You see, I learned long ago that the opinion of people like you matters not one whit. You lost the argument a long time ago, and there just aren't many of you left. So I laugh and goad you into demonstrating how much of a buffoon you are. It's fun, and everybody needs a hobby.

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

This makes literally zero sense.

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nah, faggots are the stupid ones. I don't particularly like faggots and avoid them when possible.

Fortunately, I'd estimate they only make up around a quarter of the gay population. Unfortunately, they're the loud ones.

But nice ad hominem fallacy you have going there.

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

Thank you for clarifying your position.

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oh, they're there. But you won't read them if I do. Your mind is too closed to consider anything that's contrary to your perceptions. So why waste my time?

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

I can't speak to "faggots," but I enjoy showing people how stupid they are.

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ah, now we're getting somewhere. It's just you.

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

You know nothing about me. I've been voluntarily celibate for years, and I enjoy a daily walk with Jesus. Stop assuming.

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm not talking about adoption. I'm talking about biological kids. Happens all the time. It used to happen more in the past, when gay men married because they needed a beard for fear of getting lynched. Thankfully we're past that, but I know several gay men in their 50's+ with children.

As for the wall, you know nothing about me. It'd be fun to see you try.

0
anon82059 0 points ago +1 / -1
  1. I've been voluntarily celibate for years. You should really stop assuming.

  2. You've not provided any data either. One article published by an organization with a vested interest in the outcome isn't data. It's polemics.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›