I accidentally walked into a pro-Falun Gong protest in NYC a few years ago. Had no idea what the fuck it was.
Sad - if it happened today, I’d join that protest in a heartbeat.
Consider making this its own post. I know many folks who refuse to migrate off the Big Tech platforms because the alternatives seem too overwhelming to figure out — maybe we can get a little chain of recommendations going.
25 years in — but fair point :)
More likely the former than the latter, imo. There was one point around the time period you mention where I was really starting to love him for a minute because it seemed like he was starting to break out of the conditioning. But then... right off the deep end.
He’s a believer in faith, manifesting reality / law of attraction, that type of stuff (he gave an interview on Oprah about the check he wrote to himself early on - he later made exactly that amount on a movie; etc). So I wouldn’t be completely surprised if he was once good, then bad, and was trying to undo it to be good again. But I think he’s solidly back to fucked up, now.
He also wasn’t a new cabal recruit in 2014; he’s been famous since at least 1990. So there’s that.
You’re not the only one - but it’s because the focal length of the lens isn’t quite right for how far away they are. There’s another link in this thread where the camera angle is only on Trump, and it’s much better.
How the fuck did I miss that? Wow.
3 + 4 + 1 + 9 = . . .
It’s always projection with these fools. They don’t know how to do much else.
She’s sneering at Trump, not GWB. So NCSWIC still makes sense in both cases.
Laura would not flash a photo of her husband in chains like that. The people behind her would have seen it. Definitely not any kind of a gory photo.
Based on their reaction, I could totally believe it if it said something simple but recognizable - an acronym, which doesn’t require an eye-scan to read. Something like, oh idk, NCSWIC?
Are we thinking too hard, here? A promise to counter could be as simple as “NCSWIC.”
They would be aware of the acronym, would glance at it as if it were a picture (ie requires no eye-movement/reading), and that phrase in and of itself could certainly be seen as a promise to counter.
I think this is pretty probable — perhaps the DS also wonders whether Q is just a LARP? If they’re just as in the dark as we are, then it would make sense for Laura to ask, “Is this real?”
Just my two cents.
So they’d be held liable under a Texas law called Chapter 98, huh?
9 + 8 = . . .
I always wondered whether Benedict was one of the good guys or the bad guys. Now I think I know.
I think this was referring to the debacle where the media made fun of someone for eating pizza with a knife and fork. Was it Trump himself?
The simulation is winking at us again
No. What difference, at this point, does it make?
The J&J is not.
Was that Jonah from Veep?
This was so satisfying to read. Thanks for saying it perfectly.
Annoyed that I had to scroll down this far to find any comment that said this. This thread has more comments than any other thread of late the last few weeks and it’s full of people who don’t know how to read. This movement has gone down the tubes.
I don’t care to get involved in this argument, but need to point out that you literally did say “I think” and did not mention the word ‘maybe’ even once.
In other words: faith. ??
underrated