Even the Warsaw Pact has been gone for nearly 34 years now. At this point NATO does more harm than good. The Russians have the benefit of not having to fund or participate in a treaty organization for 33 years and change. Think how much money we could've saved (if our own dim-witted geniuses didn't fund everything around the world anyway) if we dropped out of NATO at the same time in 1991. Think how many hundreds of thousands to millions of people wouldn't have died in all the stupid wars.
End it.
Exactly. For those of you that don't know - dismissing it without prejudice means it can be filed again. Dismissing it with prejudice means the case is over - it can't be filed again.
This means the dems want these cases opened again once President Trump is out of office again.
Here is the google AI blurb:
When a case is "dismissed with prejudice," it means the case is permanently dismissed and cannot be refiled later, while a case "dismissed without prejudice" allows the plaintiff to refile the same claim in the future, essentially meaning the dismissal is only temporary; the key difference is the ability to bring the case back to court later on.
Key points about dismissal with prejudice:
Final judgment: This is considered a final decision in the case, preventing the plaintiff from bringing the same claim against the defendant again.
Cannot be refiled: Once dismissed with prejudice, the case is closed permanently and cannot be brought back to court.
Key points about dismissal without prejudice:
Temporary dismissal: This allows the plaintiff to refile the case at a later date, potentially with amended claims or after addressing issues in the original case.
Subject to statute of limitations: While the case can be refiled, it must be done within the applicable statute of limitations.
Reasons for dismissal without prejudice: Gathering more evidence, Correcting procedural errors, and Waiting for a new development in the case.
Correct. If it isn't here it didn't happen:
She didn't resign yet. X has a ton of people saying she resigned, because Trump named his new pick. She will 100% be gone on 1/20/25, but shw could leave early if she wanted to. I doubt that though.
Here is where it would be announced if/when she resigns:
I buy avocados from Sam's Club fairly regularly and I'm paying around 2x what I paid as late as June of this year. I was buying them for between $2.79 and $3.50 and right now they are $6.34. That's for 5 of them.
I will concede that these may now be from Peru - it doesn't say on the current bag - but the ones earlier in the year said Mexico. They probably are from Peru now - they don't ripen properly and go bad before they are fully ripe. The Mexican ones are usually really good.
Maybe we should tariff Peruvian Avocados instead.
If anything happened to Trump before the inauguration, the 20th amendment would be invoked. https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-20/
Specifically section 3:
If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.
The part that concerns me is "or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify". This has never been tested. However, JD wasn't a part of the whole J6 scam operation so there should be no way he could get caught up in any of the bogus 14th amendment stuff CONgress and the DS are trying to pull. It won't have any chance of getting past SCOTUS either, so I don't see anything happening. People like Ratskin are just throwing stuff at the walls to see what sticks.
There is also not nearly enough time to 25th Biden now. While the process can be 25-27 days if all of the timelines (4 days, 48 hours, 21 days) play out, it isn't as simple as everyone seems to think. The biggest hurdle will likely be getting 2/3 of each house of CONgress to approve it. Fat chance. That is assuming that they can even get the required amount of votes to actually invoke it against Biden.
Of course that may be why the people who are really making the decisions in the background are pushing us quickly into WW3. That could get enough of the war hawks to vote for it, and enough of the "no more war" people to also vote for it if they think Biden is actually making the decisions.
Here are the dates for the electoral college process:
https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/2024-04/Electoral_College_2024_Dates_508.pdf
How long before all the environmentalists start reeeeing about how many CO2 laser pulses are equivalent to cow farts and will destroy the ozone layer? They want to get rid of farms anyway - why not exaggerate? I mean CO2 lasers can have nitrogen, helium, and hydrogen and or xenon. I'm sure the loons can make that sound scary enough to protest.
Get big dogs. My Aussie/Border Collie mix and Golden/Grand Pyrenees mix catch all kinds of stuff in my back yard. Squirrels, frogs, moles, rabbits, mice, rats, birds, and the occasional snake. The golden mix usually eats the rabbits and squirrels, which tbh kinda pisses me off since I'd like to have them around for if/when the SHTF. My wife also has a min-pin that catches mice as well. My other dog is a chihuahua/terrier/pug mix that looks like a sausage. He just stands there and watches.
I am in a suburban neighborhood in TX so there aren't many (if any) coyotes that come in here but there are out in the woods. I also know what you mean about San Diego regarding the coyotes. I was working a long contract out there in the 2011-12 years around Rancho Bernardo, came out late at night from work into the parking lot, and came face-to-face with 2 coyotes right by my rental car. I yelled at them while waving my arms and going towards them, and they ran out to the road and watched me. They ran again when I honked the horn while leaving. It was in a big tech complex. Fun.
I was an E-2 making pennies. I had to borrow the $500 from my Director of Operations because the bank was closed for the weekend - paid him back Monday morning. Great guy.
Drove the car for about a year until a chaplain from Ramstein saw it when he was TDY to my base. He offered me the $1500 once he found out I couldn't take it home and I was an E-2 - he knew I paid $500 for it. He took it back to Ramstein to fully restore it. I guess his heirs have/will make a lot of money at some point. I'm just glad he made both of us happy.
I had one of these back in 1989 when I was stationed in England. It was a right-hand drive with the wooden interior, push-button start both inside and under the hood, and dual gas tanks you could choose by flipping a switch on the dash. Bought it for $500 and sold it in a year for $1500 when I was leaving (and couldn't afford to ship it to the states).
1966 S-Type (mine was silver).
https://www.beverlyhillscarclub.com/1966-jaguar-s-type-3.8-saloon-c-15336.htm
Probably has something to do with HRC - Human Rights Campaign. They are the smooth-brains behind all of this.
You mean this guy?
That's what they used. They can put the same things on ICBMs as well with little to no changes. The MIRV setup allows Multiple missiles on top of the IRBM or ICBM.