No, she is not a judge in any system of law in force in the United States. No court in the United States recognizes her as a judge. She’s a random crackpot who calls herself a judge.
The system of law in effect in the United States combines the common law with statute law and the overarching constraints of the Constitution. The rest of this is genuinely complete nonsense. I realize that you think it’s true, but it’s not.
She is a judge.
No, she’s not.
Do you dispute that in 1871 the corporation was set up?
In 1871 the district of Columbia was administratively established as a municipal corporation. That’s it. The rest is unhinged nonsense.
Do you dispute that the fencing surrounding the federal capital looks more like a border fence?
More like a border fence than what?
Do you dispute that the vatican is one of the city states?
The Vatican is a city-state, much like San Marino, Monaco, and a host of others. It has no special relationship to Washington DC or the United States, if that’s the claim.
Do you dispute that the Fed is a foreign entity? Do you dispute that the IRS is a foreign entity?
Neither the Fed nor the IRS are ‘foreign entities’ in any sense established in US law.
Do you dispute that we are being invaded by the parishioners of the Pope?
Is this a reference to illegal immigration?
That the corporation is providing stimulus checks & social services to his parishioners?
What corporation? Catholics aren’t excluded from stimulus checks; why would they be?
That they are exempt from COVID rules?
Who? Catholics?
She’s not being detained. This is wishful thinking at its silliest.