It's a paraphrase of the claims from "reptiliandude" and "InsurrectionEarth." I took some liberties to obscure the origin but that's basically what they're saying.
EDIT: Be warned, RD is a major jerk and definitely not pro-Trump.
Pretty much all the effective treatments appear to work like anti-malarials or anti-parasitics. The primary action of anti-malarials is zinc ionophore activity. Either they used "malaria" as a component of this 'virus' or it's some kind of endoparasite that is similar to malaria.
To "answer without horns or teeth," it is not a religion.
Unfortunately, your post has lots of red flags that need to be pointed out to accurately address the question. Citing "religion" + "blind faith" smacks of an anti-theist's malice toward religion. As such, this could be an attempt to pigeonhole Q discussions into this paradigm which could be a prejudgment on the part of the poster. The "honest question" phrase is often a common tactic used by such individuals to disarm logical objections that could unmask their malign intentions. Dissecting that objection is not anger. If there's any emotional content it's frustration at the willful ignorance.
Now, let's break the core question down. Supposing this is an anti-theist's hostility to religion, the anti-theist paradigm is usually founded upon misrepresentation of religions as merely being ignorant superstitions from primitive people which are held to be stupid and reject reality. These enemies of "religions" presume that these worldviews should be discarded for a more "rationalistic" worldview based on their own consensus about what is "reasonable." However, Q is most certainly NOT an ignorant superstition. The posts exist and those who follow the clues seem to find relevant information sometimes.
However, anti-theism is a strawman position. These sentiments fail to account for the nature of religions as a formalized worldview about how people believe the ultimate reality to operate. Regardless of the presentation that paradigm is couched in, religions operate at multiple levels to provide their followers with a sense of truth. The basic literal sense of their stories may or may not be accurate from a scientific perspective but they unequivocally convey an important message about the underlying reality behind these beliefs. The allegories and interpretations derived impact the daily living of the follower. The mysticism that surrounds the messages give an overall sense of teleology and meaning to the whole picture being drawn. But even in that sense, Q decoding is far too informal and specific to world government affairs to be described as anything like that.
Q decoding is just a hunt for information that follows up from what these "Q posts" are giving as clues. Q sometimes cites religious references but that doesn't make his point religious. These clues appear to be connect to real world events and there are certainly reasons that many find sufficient enough to consider "Q proofs." Even so, these are plausibly deniable to someone with an intention to do so. Q's clues are intentionally vague because the information conveyed is supposedly something that has been classified and hidden from the public.
And while some citations invoke religious sentiments and references, the core topic is nonetheless the hidden actions of governments around the world. Q specifically cited a methodology of "think logically" and "trust yourself" and to utilize "critical thinking." Those with religious convictions will find Q's religious citations to be meaningful. Those who aren't will focus on the clues are about the information and not color it with that specific worldview.
The "children of Cain" also known as the "Watchers," having destroyed their own genomes, were compelled to prey on newer primate species like ours to repair the damage they had done to themselves. In the process they taught mankind all of their vices and all of their crimes. The occult rituals of child abuse and murder as the backbone of their "royalty cult." The institution of false democracies that are really run by hidden oligarchs and implement Orwellian social control mechanisms like chipping. The dropping of diseases and selling cures for profit. Treating people like genetic cattle. And eventually replacing the actual consciousness of other, healthy specimens, with their own depraved consciousness.
Does this have something to do with why Ivermectin is being used?
Shills are always dripping with tu quoque and ad hominem.
I’m always for God since He saved me. The Holy Spirit and Christ helped me out from the devil’s attacks many years ago and I fully believe the theology as Luther’s reformation clarified it. (Minus the YEC tendencies of some of my fellowship)
But I have to confess I am a bit frustrated how He’s letting things play out. I feel like Jonah a lot these days. It feels like a bit of a masochistic streak in His nature that innocents, even His Son, must suffer the depredations of the evil one and his minions. But God is good. He just doesn’t prefer the perfect path but one of struggles. Even with these we’re always provided with some grace to overcome the enemy.
Just what did he "hunt" for that is a "tasty morsel" there?
There's no food in the picture...
Maybe his wife? Who the fuck ever says that about their wife?
His kid? shudder
It's fine, I've looked at a bit of esoteric stuff myself. I'm not against it but I do have my grounding elsewhere.
To answer your question, I'm a Lutheran. It's pretty natural that I don't trust the Roman Catholic Church much given our history and our differences. That said, I do think a lot of Catholics are trying to be good Christians even if I disagree with them on a lot of things.
Ah Gnosticism. Right about the illusion, wrong about its provenance and ultimate moral.
Also you might want to look at the Book of Enoch that the Copts preserved. Interesting little hypothesis about the "Watchers" there.
Occam's razor is a rule of thumb that says one should prefer a simpler explanation to a more complex one if it is sufficient to explain the observations completely. Occam's razor is not a rule that determines what is real. It's a rule that we use to simplify our explanations if they get unnecessarily complicated. In the case of history, a common example is heliocentrism vs geocentrism. The parsimonious explanation is the orbit of the sun rather than the earth.
With regards to the UFO phenomenon we are discussing multiple hypotheses. One of these is the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis. (ETH) There are enough observations in the UFO phenomenon that make it extremely difficult to rely on solely natural explanations for the phenomenon. There are certainly cases where the phenomenon is a misidentification but there are also cases which defy such explanations. There are multiple possible explanations and each scenario is different.
It's certainly possible that some of these observations are the result of human technology. (i.e. government secrets) But it's also apparent that some of these observations don't fit any physics that we can currently assign to even the most hidden of dark projects that humans might have created. In that sense, parsimony actually works in a multivariant way and sometimes the ETH explanation is actually simpler than any of the others.
The overarching tendency of many non-UFO accepting researchers, however, is to pigeonhole all observations as some kind of contrivance like "swamp gas" which are often insufficient to explain the data or are simply bullshit. Science doesn't work by consensus of experts. Science works by admitting our ignorance and coming up with models to explain the observations.
You admit that other intelligent species probably exist. The universe is billions of years old. Why do you assume then that it is impossible for them to be more advanced in science than us? Why do you assume that our methods of physics are the necessarily the most complete? There's a whole lot we don't know about in science. Dark Energy or the physics of Singularities ring a bell? Perhaps someone else has found methods to use physics that are not subject to the limitations that we find in our methods? That's not a thing you can assume is false just on the basis of your preference. You don't know what other species would do with their physics.
And who says other species would want to communicate with us? Maybe they they see us as a resource to exploit for their own gain? Maybe they put us under a quarantine and treat us like we treat zoo animals? You don't know.
And who knows? Just because you're more advanced doesn't make you immune to attacks. Native Americans were able to harm Conquistators despite a huge technology difference. Maybe the little human plains apes just got lucky once or twice.
Yeah, I've seen that strategy. Playing to your ego. It's really annoying.
Now this. This is some real "social justice."
You can't believe UFOs have arrived here without denying ALL KNOWN PHYSICS
Yes you can. It's quite simple. You admit it yourself when you used the word "KNOWN." With our current knowledge of physics, we can't yet conceive of a way that we can replicate but that doesn't mean someone else hasn't found a way.
Just because we don't know something yet doesn't mean that it might not be real. Think about all the things that ancient people didn't know about. Radiation. Stellar evolution. Planetary orbits. Does that mean those weren't real? Of course not. We just didn't have any models of science that described them yet.
Given our current knowledge we can only guess at some possible routes that might be used by someone else for the kinds of FTL travel and communication necessary to bypass these limitations we believe space-time and quantum mechanics impose. That doesn't mean someone else hasn't found ways around them.
Maybe it's possible to have FTL communication and travel in some way? Perhaps we find that quantum mechanics allows for other kinds of entanglement than we have yet discovered. Perhaps a subspace that objects can travel through. Or stabilized wormholes of some kind. Or maybe some kind of warp engines.
You'd have to assume that our current physics understanding is absolutely complete to think that there aren't options available to another space faring civilization.
If Kamala Harris takes over, y’all need to trick the progressives to demand the truth about her connections with One West Bank. Or so I’ve heard. It’s supposedly something that will make her more pliable
Or, in Lutheran Satire format: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0-EgjUhRqA
Did you really just label critical thinking a conspiracy theory? HAHAHA
It don't mean a thing while Dominion has the swing.
Hang on a second. Isn't that what Trump gussied up the WH to look like? Has he been broadcasting his Oval Office from the Castle Rock set to throw off the DS, too?
Catholics use the word antipope for fake Popes. Let's call Biden an antipresident.
It's been moved to https://patriots.win because of a Domain Name issue.
If she didn't want to swear on the Bible, she could have taken the "solemnly affirm" oath. Clearly an insult.
"You've got to be your own man..."
What, you mean like your VP?
Someone needs to meme up Twitter smothering Mike Lindell with a pillow.