3
fluffmiceter 3 points ago +3 / -0

J&J uses the exact same mechanism as all of the other shots, but it is delivered inside of a different dead virus, instead of a tiny lipid casing. They all use this mRNA tech. None of them use the traditional vaccination method.

5
fluffmiceter 5 points ago +5 / -0

I just saw a bunch of graphs that clearly show the deadliness of all of the classic diseases dropping rapidly well before widespread vaccinations for said diseases, if that isn't proof enough that there is some validity to the claim that "vaccines take credit for something they did not accomplish", then I don't know what is.

You say "absolutely no proof to back it up", yet I am staring at said proof right now. If you want, why don't you show me why these graphs are incorrect.

2
fluffmiceter 2 points ago +2 / -0

MSM is an overly attached psychotic ex that you want to forget about. But they just won't go away! Sheesh.

3
fluffmiceter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Where did this "two years" number come from? I completely agree, this "vaccine" is not to be trusted. But we should not be throwing around made up numbers, that only weakens our case.

4
fluffmiceter 4 points ago +4 / -0

All of the "vaccines" that are out right now follow the same exact mechanism, but with different delivery mechanisms.

The two shot vaccines deliver mRNA through what you can essentially think as microscopic oil bubbles, into your body. The bubble is there to protect the mRNA strands, which are extremely fragile (this is also why it must be kept in cold storage).

The J&J vaccine takes a different virus, inserts the mRNA into said virus, and then uses that to deliver the mRNA to your body. The virus protects the mRNA and makes it not fragile at all, so J&J can be stored easily.

All of these vaccines have the same exact end result, which is having mRNA which codes for the spike proteins being read by your cells, resulting in your cells creating those spike proteins in the protein factories, which is supposed to enable your immune system to learn how to respond to those proteins. So any potential problems with this whole system will be experienced by all of the vaccines.

6
fluffmiceter 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why don't you fuck off instead? Nobody needs to hear your preaching ass. Life is tough and not everyone can claim to be a virtuous hero, like you. You should be happy that people are starting to grow a pair and fight back with you.

1
fluffmiceter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know if medical exemption is really a possibility, if I were to go that route, I would need to go talk to my general doctor, who knows I don't have any history of medical problems, besides the occasional pollen allergy or slightly anomalous blood test result.

I think in a few months, if things are seriously bad about this vaccine, then we will start to really learn about it (for those of us who are looking, of course, I don't expect the normies to learn jack shit). So, I'm really counting on the possibility that this vaccine is not completely terrible, and the DS is actually counting on future vaccines to do the real damage.

Disclosing all of this personal information is really really stupid of me, but my scholarship means I will be paying 7 thousand dollars per year, for a total of 28 thousand dollars over 4 years. This includes dorms and tuition. School prices are insanely artificially inflated, but I think I am making the best of the situation with this scholarship and some engineering course.

Anyways we will see if I end up having to take the shot. If I do, I will definitely be posting a lot about it here, as well as short and long term side effects.

2
fluffmiceter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am considering it because I may not have a choice. I do appreciate what you are saying and agree 100%.

I am 19 years old, fit and healthy. According to the statistics I could find, my case mortality probability is around 99.996%. With that said, there is NO REASON for me to want an experimental drug that in all likelihood, is MORE LIKELY to cause serious problems than the 99.996% chance of dying from Covid. Plus, we know that there are so many effective ways to deal with Covid, from different drugs to diets, vitamins and minerals, etc.

The reason why I may not have a choice in taking the shot is because my school is requiring mandatory vaccinations (it is the J&J one) to attend. It is too late for me to apply to other schools at this minute (plus I have a great scholarship, though trust me, this has not been anywhere near a major influence in my decision-making). I am going to wait until the very last minute, which will be September of this year (which is definitely the smartest thing I can do in this current position). I like to explore all of my options, but right now it is looking like getting the shot is a very very real inevitability for me.

Many other students are heavily opposed to this mandatory vaccination program, so maybe I aught to reach out to them and see what their plans are. I know what my school is doing is definitely not legal, but I don't have the resources to start a lawsuit; I can only hope someone else will start one soon.

For the record, dropping out of school is definitely one of my options, though it is definitely a big decision that I would need to think through heavily (as is getting the "vaccine", though so many people seem to just take it like it's candy).

3
fluffmiceter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here's how it works:

People are in fear of what they think is a plague, so they try to avoid it like a plague. But the reality is, masks don't work, social distancing don't work, and when we go outside, we are most likely being exposed to the CCP virus left and right. HOWEVER. Corona, being a product of China, was shittily made, and is actually not as dangerous as people would like to believe; so our immune systems are kicking corona butt every day (most of our immune systems already know how to fight corona tenfold by now, but obviously we aren't supposed to know that).

And where does the "vaccine" come into all of this? Well, the shot injects some crap into your body that messes with your immune system, making your immune system damaged/tired out. And then, when you get exposed to corona again, like you have many times before, because you have that weakened immune system, you get sick.

... or the "vaccine" results in a false positive on your covid test, which is probably what happened. It sounds like this "John" is actually sick, since he is in the hospital? Or maybe he's just being told he is "asymptomatically carrying covid" which is total bullshit.

15
fluffmiceter 15 points ago +15 / -0

I can personally attest to this, from several different people in my circle of life. The people who are the most preachy about racism and whatnot always happen to be the people who are secretly very prejudice.

I know the crime statistics, I know the reality of the shattered black male family structure, I know about the problems with drugs, crime culture, et cetera. But. I give people a fair shot, and race is never my first judgement on how I should respond to a person or situation.

The people in my life who are prejudice will judge people off of just race, and shockingly frequently. Whether it is avoiding certain people, holding said people to extremely low expectations, and other forms of unfair judgement. Obviously the racists I am talking about are not fucking KKK members who will go out shooting black and brown people, because those people do not exist in today's world, and the people who are in constant cycles of fear and anger over these nonexistent boogeymen are total fools.

7
fluffmiceter 7 points ago +7 / -0

What are your thoughts on the possible link between the shot and fertility issues? Obviously people who are pregnant should not be taking this shot (still, people do? wtf??), but I am more looking at the angle of non-pregnant folk. I'm a young guy, I don't want to find out a few years down the line that I cannot have children, any thoughts?

5
fluffmiceter 5 points ago +5 / -0

She died. Information about a supposed shootout, the director of the CIA visiting some place, etc came out and coincided with her mysterious disappearance. To me, this is sufficient evidence to suggest that the leaks are real, and she did indeed die. I have not seen anything notable to the contrary.

3
fluffmiceter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dunno where you get this confidence, but I will save this post for the heck of it. If it turns out to be true, I might have to ask ya some questions xD

1
fluffmiceter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see, that could be a thing.

2
fluffmiceter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems like a stretch. What I mean is, in drop 1007, there are 6 +'s in total, but you just ignored the first 3. You cannot do that when looking for connections, selectively ignoring things to help your case.

by NotACop
8
fluffmiceter 8 points ago +8 / -0

It is incredible how literally everything out of that era supports the interpretation of the second amendment which is that its primary purpose is to protect our liberty, yet these dumbass leftists and communists want people to believe the amendment is about hunting or self defense against bears or some crap.

1
fluffmiceter 1 point ago +1 / -0

IQ was designed to measure general competency in learning and executing a wide range of levels of work. A high IQ means you can be a doctor, an engineer, a lawyer. A low IQ means you cannot be those things. An extremely low IQ means you are incapable of basic tasks, would be legally classified as retarded, etc. The military uses IQ to make sure their recruits can follow basic commands.

On the subject of the test itself, it is supposedly designed to detect high levels of problem solving and pattern recognition. So I would argue that IQ, though likely correlated with education level (since IQ is positively correlated to wealth, and higher wealth usually means higher education level), is actually independent of education.

Let’s just say that I’ve known some people who are very very good at what they do, and are brilliant at figuring out math problems and whatnot, yet they cannot see straight when it comes to the real world. I don’t think those people have exceptional IQs because of that, in fact I am pretty certain they have normal IQs but just a lot of focus and dedication to their specific studies which makes them geniuses in those fields.

Of course I conveniently framed this argument to suggest that we, the “awakened” ones, are geniuses with high IQs because we have seen through the smoke and mirrors of society.. haha. Maybe there is some element of truth beyond just self-flattery, anyways that’s my two cents.

6
fluffmiceter 6 points ago +6 / -0

Then the question is, is our definition of “smart” correct if people who are “smart” cannot think critically and self-analyze their own positions? Maybe “smart” is due for a redefinition.

1
fluffmiceter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly I’d take Putin who may or may not side with us against the new world order, over Ukraine which is somehow the root of every political corruption scandal in the disgusting interconnected swamp that is the deep state.

Fuck Ukraine. I’m sure their citizens are doing just fine. But fuck Ukraine. If I’m supposed to hate Putin, I’m sure not going to hate him for the same reasons that the deep state hates him.

2
fluffmiceter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for your detailed response and insights. I was just throwing around ideas to see if any would stick. Indeed, it would seem logical that a cell presenting the spike proteins would trigger the same kind of immune response as would the virus itself, though I don’t know if this is exactly the case. In which case, any problems regarding the immune system attacking parts of the human body due to the spike protein-learning would likely also occur from natural encounters and learning of the virus itself. Which is to say, it would not happen (if it did, it would be a fatal flaw in the design of the immune system, which I highly doubt).

I don’t have the same reading that you do, so hearing that the similarity between the spike protein and reproductive protein is limited to a sequence of 4 amino acids is very reassuring. I assume even this small matchup is very uncommon, otherwise it would not have been brought up to attention in the first place, but it sounds like this is still of low concern.

The topic of cytokine storm is interesting, though I need to look into how that situation even occurs to begin with. My understanding of it is that the immune system configures itself in a certain way in response to the presented protein, which somehow disrupts the whole start & stop mechanism. If that primitive understanding is correct, then it begs the question of how come this same situation does not also happen as a result of natural encounters with the virus? Or maybe it does?

2
fluffmiceter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are there any useful resources I can look at regarding this? It sounds like you know what you are talking about, and I am inclined to believe you are speaking in good faith for all of us here.

I hear whispers about some aspect of the different antibodies produced in response to the spike proteins results in attacking some aspect of sperm production (with the logical connection being, I think at least, that sperm is designed to penetrate an egg like how the spike protein of corona is designed to penetrate cells for infection, so therefore the components are similar enough for the immune system to get confused?)

I have also heard that somehow, some mechanism of the immune response to the spike proteins is disruptive to some other mechanism which is meant to regulate (as in, ramp up and slow down) how the immune system responds to infections, which results in the immune system ramping up to turbo speed upon infection of a disease, but not being able to turn itself off, resulting in something which I believe is referred to as "cytokine storm".

The latter of my two main concerns is probably the one that has more actual medical background to it, but the former is one that I am very scared of because my fertility is very important to me. I think for the latter, if this were the case, we would've started seeing examples of this happening on a large scale, however the former is worrying to me because it could take months and years for problems with fertility to become evident (like how many things have been discovered to be carcinogenic or causing birth defects, many decades after they became widespread in use).

I know I'm asking a lot from you, but if you could just lend some insight, like tell me if I'm worrying about something totally cracked up, or if there is any good leads on what I should and shouldn't be concerned about, then I would greatly appreciate it. It is looking likely that I will have to take one of the vaccines, because my university is requiring vaccination to attend; I'm still looking for options and holding out hope, but it would definitely be a very difficult path forward to resist vaccination (for my case).

1
fluffmiceter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you really need a study to prove this? Breaking news! The sky is blue.

30
fluffmiceter 30 points ago +30 / -0

I saw the letters being handed to the wives, but never saw this part. Wow, excellent dig!

Speaking of, can we talk about FUTURE PROVES PAST? Q: "Follow the wives". Bush funeral: letters handed to wives of all of the enemies, INCLUDING Karen Pence (shockingly, to many of us, at the time). Time passes. Guess what? Pence fully exposed as a traitor. Talk about future proves past! I have 100% faith in the white hats and Q, and I don't say that lightly. Sometimes fear makes you question your faith, but looking back at all of this reaffirms it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›