6
formerdemfortrump 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wait, for real? It's all good if you're confident in the plan. I have some confidence in the plan. But please don't be giving us all false hope.

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +3 / -2

Well, if military intelligence really has a plan for Trump, there's no way he'd back down. That's for sure.

But if it turns out that doesn't fall through, then we have to fight for election reform and hope for the best.

-5
formerdemfortrump -5 points ago +3 / -8

If there is a plan as monumental as the one Q suggests, then a Farewell address wouldn't affect it in any way.

But to be fair, "the best is yet to come" could also be a hint that he plans to run in 2024

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. I never thought that analysis was needed to make sense of the plan

2
formerdemfortrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

The first point your coworker makes is actually pretty accurate. Here's the thing: some of these EOs are pretty big in impact, and a few of them seem strikingly relevant to what we talk about here on GAW.

Secondly, I think people lean a little too heavily on the "corporation thing" that you mention. Who says all of that theory is needed for the kind of military operation we are anticipating? If there is treason, crimes against humanity, blackmail schemes, and corruption to be contended with, I don't think the military needs a complicated theory about how the US is now a corporation and will return to its pre-1871 existence.

7
formerdemfortrump 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is honestly why I think, from my limited perspective, if there's a plan they (military/POTUS) should take care of things before the inauguration. Why leave it to such a critical time with so much going on? Then again, what do I know.

32
formerdemfortrump 32 points ago +33 / -1

I heard about that too. What really happened?

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting. Pelosi I get. But what crime is Gavin Newsom suspected of?

by BQnita
8
formerdemfortrump 8 points ago +8 / -0

"Waiting for Biden to be take office" for the plan to be completed makes no sense. It would undermine the whole line of reasoning of the Q phenomenon: having a Commander in Chief that is not compromised by the corruption in Washington DC to lend the Military/Military intelligence the ability to take down the DS. The unique power of the Commander in Chief is what makes any sort of Q plan possible.

There cannot be a simultaneous transfer of power to the military and to Biden. It's one or the other.

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

So the way I understand it is:

Red 1: Potus Twitter removal. Check. Also, 45 holding out the large red folder in tent video on 1/6

Red 6: Kansas's wine tweet shows that goes through

There was something going on Castle Rock, correct? Thought I saw a Space Force commander confirm that

Red4: Pence speaks to 10th mountain

There was also a major Declass no?

I'm trying to piece it all together but rather to new to this so apologies in advance if I muddied things.

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still getting used to navigating that Q posts. Does anyone have any recommended Q posts regarding the child exploitation so often mentioned on this site??

I've read a lot of the Q posts pertaining to military intelligence, DOJ and FBI misconduct, but not much on human trafficking, abuse, etc.

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any chance this has sway over Miller?

I doubt it, but wonder what you guys think.

3
formerdemfortrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great point. I saw some people who were dooming because FLOTUS put out a farewell video.

But, if there really is this plan that Q mentions, and it really is as solid as many of us think, were only going to be able to see small hints of it. A farewell video by FLOTUS or Pompeo calling Biden President-Elect won't stop it. And we often won't be able to tell who are the White hats and who are the black hats.

2
formerdemfortrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve been seeing that theory on here more, lol. Is there source material for why so many people believe this ?

3
formerdemfortrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good point. We know beyond a reasonable doubt that Q and POTUS have coordinated activity and that Q is close to the President.But that does not mean the Plan is bullet proof, or that there is even a plan for that matter.

But Q being a DS Psyop seems unlikely, considering how much conflict Trump has with the FBI and CIA.

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

He predicted that Mattis would resign a few months before he did apparently. He made a claimed that Trump would win the election in 2016 because a small group of people had unrigged it. )Q says something similar right ?

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

How does drop 523 figure into this ?

7
formerdemfortrump 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nah buddy, give it to at least the 20th. If Biden is sworn in, I think we have to believe the plan failed. But I expect something big today.

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

When I really started looking into Q, it gave me hope. When I just believed that Sidney Powell and Patrick Byrne were the only one’s with the good I was bummed when I heard they were having difficulty accessing the White House. Mainly because Pat Cipollone is turning out to be a scumbag.

But, If there’s anything to what Q has been saying, military intelligence has already been providing Trump the goods.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›