Transhumanism (a suggested belief system) aims to exchange 1 (perceived reality) with 0 (suggested fiction).
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) one perceives inspiration (from within spirit); while being tempted to ignore it for suggested information (from within form) by others. Resisting that temptation represents forms resistance to the velocity of flow for temporary growth potential (form) within ongoing loss of potentiality (flow).
another person...two realities
ANOTH'ER, adjective [one and other]; also A'LIEN, adjective [Latin alienus, from alius, another] + PERSON; noun - "per sonos (by sound)"
What if each form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents ONE within ALL; and "another" to each other? What if ALL doesn't communicate "two"; but offers ONE the choice to count all others?
What if ONE can be deceive through suggestion of counting to ignore being ONE within ALL (self discernment); which afterwards would allow the growth of understanding towards ALL being ONE in energy? What if "we" represent "alone" aka ALL(in)ONE?
What if "reality" doesn't proclaim itself to be real? What if it moves all within to communicate perceived inspiration; which choice (need/want) can ignore for suggested information (fiction) by others? What if ignoring reality for fiction represents suggested information (want) over perceived inspiration (need)?
alternate
Question ALTERN'ATE, adjective [Latin alternatus.] - "one following the other" in regard to ONEs (form) transmutation out of ALL (flow) aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life), and form to flow (death)?
Furthermore; question the positioning of form (choice) within the momentum (balance) of flow...does choice represent a response ability within balance, and could it be tempted to ignore balance (need/want) for suggested choices (want vs not want) aka balance (need) for imbalance (want)?
Maybe I'm NOT insane?
Insane (in sanus aka within sound) + Person (per sonos aka by sound). Therefore; you represent the choice based response to being within perceivable sound (insane). On the other hand...nothing (NOT) cannot exist within everything. One cannot perceive nothingness; since perception implies in response to everything.
nazi doctor bad & serial killers
Orange man bad & school shootings...same script; duller audience.
violence against government
Govern (to control) + ment; from mens (mind) is caused by consent (choice of want over need) to suggestion (representative government). Any violence against mind control; while ignoring that consenting choice is causing it; will only end in self destruction.
Instead of going against mind control (government); learn/teach oneself how to control ones mind by choice of response to balance (need/want); instead of falling for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
All suggested information represents want; all perceived inspiration represents need. Choice represents response to balance (need/want), and resistance to the temptation of imbalance (want vs not want).
On today's menu...macaroni & jews.
One can believe that the universe is without cause, value or purpose...
Universe; from U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". The ONEness of ALL implies EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka the power of internal balance between loss (flow) and growth (form); which implies the ONEs within ALL to represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
In short....
Cause equals energy to flow/form (balance) for responding choice of form within flow.
Flow represents ALL perceivable value within balance; form represents ONEs choice based evaluation thereof.
The purpose of an internal loss/growth balance represents self sustenance.
Believing implies ignoring adapting to perceived inspiration (choice of need for growth) for consent to suggested information (choice of want for loss).
it's all just an animating spirit that binds everyone and everything together.
Spirit; form spiro - "to breathe" implies forms adaptation to flow; hence being animated by flow; hence representing AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] + HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form] aka animated (animal) form (human).
The bond of form to flow represents offer/consent aka balance/choice; while parasites suggest RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew] to bind choice through suggestion to other choices (want vs not want); while ignoring to respond to balance (need)
There is no proof either way
Because "way" implies from/to aka movement (flow); and therefore form within flow exists in response to constant change (neither true; nor false states), and the only thing that cannot change within constant change represents the rules (laws of nature) that define how flow operates; which the form within can only comprehend by adapting to the perceived consequences thereof; hence growing by choice based adaptation to balance.
So make your choice
Choice represents the response to balance (need/want); not to the suggestions from others (want vs not want). All conflicts (dissonance) in this system are based on choice ignoring to respond to balance (resonance). It's is that ignorance (choice of want over need) of the many; that fuels the parasitic exploitation by the few through suggestion and "make your choice" represents such a suggestion.
Can one within all; form within flow; choice within balance...not make choices?
As Atlas shrugged; alisa zinovyevna rosenbaum kvetches... https://pic8.co/sh/eP3YJp.jpg
a one piece puzzle.
Spoiler alert...the ONE Piece represents each ONEs journey within ALL. Growing ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived represents the puzzle.
Shomrim got preservation covered...
Whose orders do they follow?
Everyone who follows orders ignores the natural order of flow (inception towards death) for form (life). Form represents the resistance to the velocity of flow; which the parasitic few are corrupting by suggesting the many to consent to follow suggested orders instead of resisting the natural order of being moved towards death. Mankind is being tricked to want to go with the flow; to progress; to seek achievements; to hope for outcomes; to follow the party-line; to adhere to the mainstream; to just get on with it; to just do it; to livin la vida loca; till infinity and beyond etc.
The few are feeding the ignorant many back into flow; which represents transmutation out of base aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death).
which is given to us
That implies responding to origin.
hope
That implies ignoring to respond to origin for want of outcome aka ignoring that which is for the suggestion of that which isn't yet might be.
Now question that response implies by choice, and that choice originates out of balance; hence representing the responding choice.
It's all about testing our ideas of the World, and if we find something that works, we have a 'model' for it and can use that to do useful things.
IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see, Latin video.] What if what you see aka sense aka perceive represents both inspiration for your growth and temptation for your loss of both mental/physical potential? What if reality represents a self sustaining system (internal loss/growth balance) that causes you as the free will of choice in response to that balance? What if your choice within balance (need/want) represents the consequence of growth/loss?
find new ways to make steel in better ways
a) what are you making better for aka towards which goal? Also consider being form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...is life outcome oriented if death is predefined at inception or is life balance oriented; hence representing a responding free will of choice?
b) what if everything needed to make steel and everything needed to make steel better already exists; which implies that one cannot create "new"; only transmute out of ALL existence; based on ONEs understanding thereof.
useful vs useless
Doesn't that imply choice of want vs not want evaluating it as such; while reasoning (versus conflict) with others who evaluate it as the opposite? What of ONE within ALL aka choice within balance cannot define value; only evaluate (ONEs choice) value (ALL balance)?
Science has always been a process and never a conclusion.
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". Perception implies being processed as form (life) by flow (inception towards death).
Nature communicates itself to all within by moving them; which we perceive as inspiration for our choice to respond to (adaptation). We each represent an insane (in sanus aka within sound) person (per sonos aka by sound) aka a response to perceived sound (resonance).
Why do we ignore this? Because the few misuse choice to shape words (idolized meaning) out of perceived sound; which they then suggest to the many who by consenting ignore perceived inspiration for suggested information. They call this spell-craft aka suggest fictitious meaning (words) to craft the spelling for reality among those who consent to it.
Every suggested word represents an affixed idol that deceives us to ignore being the temporary resistance (form) within the ongoing velocity (flow) of an energy based system.
Every suggested information implies choice consenting to choice (to bind anew aka religio); which ignores adaptation to perceived inspiration (choice responding to balance).
Every suggested information represents the choice of wanting vs not wanting it (conflict of reason). Before one can choose between wanting or not wanting any suggestion; one makes a choice in response to balance under natural law aka need or want; with want representing the ignorance of need.
This ignorance is what the parasitic few are ruthlessly exploiting by means of suggesting want vs not want (conflict of reason). As in the age of reason on the Georgia Guidestones https://pic8.co/sh/ZFutkP.jpg
via the Scientific Method, not by taking a vote
Both imply consent by free will of choice to suggestion by free will of choice from another aka will submitting to will; while ignoring what defines having a choice (being within response to balance).
Science is about what you can prove.
What if ALL already exists and the ONEs within don't need to prove reality to others; but learn/teach ONEself to comprehend ALL perceived? What if others represents both inspiration to grow comprehension and temptation to ignore it for whatever "proof" they suggest?
A sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."the proof is in the pudding"; from PUD'DING, noun - "an intestine" (internal test); from TEST; noun (Latin testum - "earthen pot" aka formed vessel). Therefore...the proof (information) is within form; when form is out of flow (aka in spirit aka inspiration).
Trust represents choice consenting to suggestion by choice of others; which ignores what choice represents...the response to balance. Others use suggestions to deceive one to ignore balance; and thereby submit free will of choice to the free will of others. This is called RELIGION, noun. [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind) aka an inversion of the original bond under natural law (offer/consent) aka balance/choice.
ALL value is offered within balance; each ONE within represents the responding choice of evaluation thereof (choice of need)...unless ignored for the suggestions of others (choice of want).
scientific method
METH'OD, noun [Latin methodus; Gr. with, and way.]...the method for form (life) is flow (inception towards death) cause form is with the way of flow.
Now add science (scio; to know aka to perceive) and perceived movement communicates inspiration (aka within spirit); as opposed to suggested information (aka within form).
know better
That implies growth of perception; which ignores that each ONE perceives ALL; yet lacks comprehension of what it means. Adapting by choice to perceived inspiration is what would grow (make better) ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived; unless ignored for suggested information by others who brand it "knowledge" to corrupt understanding.
question science
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
Every ONE perceives ALL; every ONE knows ALL...comprehension of the other hand is what suggested scientism corrupts when consented to.
world monarch
World represents form aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death); while MON'ARCH, noun [Gr. sole, and a chief.] represents ONEs (form) sole authority over self within ALL(flow) aka ONEs choice of evaluation in response to balance within ALL value.
Your free will of choice represents the world monarch; and if you understand this, then you also represent the ALL seeing "I".
AS'TROIT, noun - "star-stone" from AS'TRITE, noun [Gr. a star.] Looks for (((stars))) and ties to "black rock".
If avant lacks guard shit happens...
Question if each ONE perceives ALL; yet lacks comprehension of what it means? Question if being ONE within ALL represents temporary growth potential (form aka life) within ongoing loss of potentiality (flow aka inception towards death)?
What if ALL communicates itself to each ONEs perceiving senses within as inspiration; while all the other ONEs tempt us to ignore this for suggested information?
What if ONEs comprehension is being grown by choice based adaptation to ALL perceived...not by consenting to information suggested by another ONE?
What if choice represents the response to balance (need/want); with need representing adaptation to perceived inspiration and want representing consent to suggested information?
What if choosing want over need (temptation of ignorance) aka suggested over perceived causes a conflict (imbalance) between those who want versus those who do not want the suggested? What if this conflict (want vs not want) is being branded by those making the suggestions as "reason"?
What if the parasitic few use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many; while a) perpetuating those conflicts by suggesting both sides endless contradictions to keep them reasoning (talmudic reasoning) and b) what if the few can at will rebrand want vs not want into for example good vs evil; true vs false; believing vs not believing; rights vs left; feminism vs patriarchy; poor vs rich; McDonalds vs Burger King; PC vs consoles; Christianity vs Islam; Republican vs Democrats and so on?
What if free will of choice exists as the response to balance; yet with the choice to ignore it for suggested imbalance? What if balancing requires responsibility of choice to struggle as form within flow; while ignoring balance for imbalance represents a constant temptation to fall for?
What if to believe or to not believe represents choice submitting to suggested choice of others? What if the industrialization thereof is called RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew]; while the original bond under natural law represents offer (balance) response (choice)?
What if ignoring (choice) the perceived foundation of existence (balance) can be tempted by means of suggestion (of choices)?
ALL perceived originates out of flow; all suggested was shaped by choice of responding form out of perceived origin, while tempting those who consent to suggested to ignore perceived in the process.
Question if nature represents the source of perceived sound, and if suggested words are being shaped by choice out of the source of perceived sound? What if words allow those who suggest them to define how those who consent to them perceive sound? What if the suggestion of "insane person" deceives those who consent to its meaning to ignore Insane (in sanus aka within sound) + Person (per sonos aka by sound)?
If I teach others words it civilizes them; yet if I teach a dog words it domesticates him? Question mass domestication through suggested meaning over perceived meaning under the brand "civilization"...
What if a lie represents the contradiction of a suggested truth? What if true represents the rebranding of "want", and lie that of "not want"...both caused by consenting the same suggested information? What's the difference between reasoning true vs false and want vs not want? Question "need" over reasoning want vs not want?
Why does one consent to the suggestion that "truth" represents a conflict with "false"? Does nature offer false information to ones perceiving senses?
What if ongoing change (perceived inspiration) is what beliefs (suggested information) ignore? What if setting a belief into ones conscious memory represents the self restriction of both perceived inspiration and the comprehension thereof?
Because a belief is being held by free will of choice; while in ignorance of having free will of choice; since consenting to believe suggested choices of others aka will to will submission and shirking of responsibility as choice within balance.
What if ALL (flow) self segregates into individual ONEs (form) to allow temporary growth (form) out of ongoing loss (flow)?
What if SPACE, noun [Latin spatium, space; spatior, to wander.] implies being ONE wandering within ALL as choice within balance?
What if TIME implies constant movement (tick; tick; tick...) and not affixed states (past; present and future)? What if the few deceive the many to ignore being form (life) within the ever changing moment(um) of flow (inception towards death) by suggesting them to ignore that which is for that which was (past aka the self inflicted trauma of upheld loss within memory); that which is for that which might be (future aka the self inflicted trauma of hope and fear), and corrupting that which is (momentum) for that which isn't (presents aka the self inflicted trauma of stress aka imbalance)?