3
hondo1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Definitely makes more sense than destroying a multi billion dollar pipeline you control that enables you to make tons of money continuously with less infrastructure/transport costs lol

1
hondo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, assuming indoors would be the primary area of interest for the fantasy attack he's insinuating. In that case a monstrous 26 inch or so barreled shotgun is a weird choice. Anywhere outdoors is presumably open and that would make it an even worse choice, depending on distances.

That said, taking a hit from that thing would not be high on most people's to do lists lol. That death tube would pack a punch.

5
hondo1 5 points ago +5 / -0

She's right, but also wrong. A small percentage of the population does use Twitter, that's true. On the other hand, the public square was not known for having every member of a town present at all times, there would just be a small percentage of a population there too. It's that the messages of that small percentage were disseminated to others that made it impactful.

1
hondo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sure the pay is yuge, but they have to be seriously insane to sign up for this? This isn't sf get in and get out missions on a vastly inferior and under equipped force. These guys are taking that mindset into a place where you'll just get smoked from an airstrike with no real warning at anytime the Russians decide it's worth doing.

1
hondo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. There are definitely major changes and it does seem like the Western system is going out of style pretty quickly.

The question would be are those at the next level above nation states just repositioning the chess board? IE removing the west from the forefront because its usefulness has expired and replacing it with a leading coalition of countries with populations that are already compliant/controlled and used to a lower standard of living.

In my eyes, this would actually align with the reset very well, so hopefully it's not the case and totally false.

2
hondo1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, ya see I want the operations over there to be good thing too, but I have to be realistic about there being other (possibly more likely) possibilities here.

Seems like every time you question Putin's intentions people get really mad. I'm not sure if it's because people instantly assume you're a low info leftist (I could get that) or because they are totally convinced that his efforts are secretly to uproot the deep state, which would be a great thing but it's foolish not to consider other possibilities in lieu of hard supporting evidence. I get that it's less comfortable to people than believing that a Russian dictator is teaming up with a Chinese communist dictator, but we were taught to think, not just blindly accept.

1
hondo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I get all that. What I'm saying is that China and Russia's new world order (according to a Chinese state rep) might just be the direction the globalists are intending things to go.

People forget that a collapsed opulent west is in full alignment with globalist ideals, no matter how it happens. They don't want citizens living like we can anymore and have made that clear. The BRICS can go IMF anytime it wants, most of their citizenry are already under the boot.

The assumption that globalism must involve the West isn't valid anymore. I get that Putin and Xi are against the west and for good cause in many ways, but the globalism isn't going anywhere, they just want it to be their form instead of the old form.

I have zero faith that any system set up by an alliance involving the Chinese communist party would result in a fair, or better, world order. It would only be even less accountable to its citizens than the already corrupt current model.

0
hondo1 0 points ago +4 / -4

Not sure about that. Killing the Western economy and creating a new allied superpower (China/Russia/others) could be very aligned with certain globalist interests.

Hopefully you're right, but the west lives better than everyone else and the globalist leaders are dying to adjust us to a lower, more subservient way of life, which they seem to be implementing under the excuses of climate change and the conflict in Ukraine.

Putin is out for him and his people and is definitely not out to benefit us. He's better than zelensky, who is actively working against his own people, but I don't trust that his objectives will work out in a way that benefits us.

5
hondo1 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Excessive heat" from the upper 80s to 100!? It's summer. That's just a normal day lol.

These people are really trying to reprogram people into thinking anything above 70 is "global warming."

2
hondo1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Hard to believe that any person actually looks at another as "royalty" still.

5
hondo1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sounds like you have her a great life for 15 years. If this was different behavior from before, she could have been declining a bit cognitively. 15 years is an amazing life for any dog! Be thankful you had her and I'm sorry that it went this way, but it is definitely not your fault!

3
hondo1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, it's interesting stuff that we all heard a year or so ago. A nice reminder, but I agree that it'd be way better if he wasn't letting his emotions derail him from the topic so much.

2
hondo1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Definitely. Not 100% sure about it because I'm not someone who deals with that kind of stuff, but the poster sounded pretty legit and like he ran into this kind of stuff in the past. That said, who knows... Just seeing that I would think it's something sketchy for sure.

3
hondo1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Someone in the comments section of pdw said it may be a generic Indian script to assign names to locations that received PPP loans, if names didn't already exist. This would explain the generic two alphabetical character names and the residential setting.

Not very exciting, but thought I'd put it out there to you all. Still could be something big, but also could be a nothingburger naming convention.

3
hondo1 3 points ago +4 / -1

Here's the thing: your own government is working against your interests, don't expect any other government to be working in your interests.

That said, our interests can align with others in a number of ways, so there's always a possibility they're aligned here. I just would never bank on it without a much more clear indication.

9
hondo1 9 points ago +9 / -0

Lol that's a special kind of stupid to get a house with a well full of beautiful drinking water and decide to dump industrial fluoride waste into it for your "health."

Reminds me of my work calls last year. Everyone on my team would go on and on about the nonsensical garbage injection and the coof and I would just sit there and scroll around on pdw or here. They would talk about how dumb the uninjected we're and all this other stuff. Oddly that all stopped a while back and they pretty much never bring up the shot these days.

2
hondo1 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's basically saying that he and the machine he's involved with will be working to steal the election for the left's candidates and then blame the loss on the candidates not being RINOS, neocons or people on Epstein's flight logs.

Hopefully he doesn't succeed though.

0
hondo1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why on earth would anyone think Putin and Xi are good guys?! I get the speculation that they COULD have some good interests, but that would require awaiting evidence to confirm or disprove.

In the meantime is it likely that billionaire communists from foreign countries are fighting for your best interests?

No!

2
hondo1 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're dead right on that, man

1
hondo1 1 point ago +1 / -0

No way, dude, I know people, particularly older people, who came from an era in which the news at least somewhat attempted to relay facts, despite doing it in a biased way. Some of these people literally have no clue about a lot of the stuff that we knew week one. No clue as in never even having heard of the arguments against this stuff.

Definitely not excusing it as it's part of what brought our country to this point and it's a bad thing, but there's not necessarily a nefarious element in them. It's in the information controllers and authority figures that lead them to that state.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›