I think most people would agree that the big evidence needs to be dropped when we have a government in place that is willing to prosecute the guilty parties. Would Biden's DOJ prosecute? Even under Trump's first term there were many within his own cabinet who were acting counter productively. For instance, Pompeo preventing the JFK evidence release. Using the Epstein/Diddy evidence to persuade bad actors is not a bad idea if it gets us in a position where all of Trump's chess pieces are in place.
If I had to guess, grand juries, using sealed indictments are taking place as we speak. If the Epstein list should drop, anyone currently being processed through the justice system could claim they could never receive a fair trial. They could win on appeal by stating the jury was tainted, the case would be thrown out, all because some people were to impatient to let the legal system do its job.
Good things come to those who wait. Patience is a virtue.
The debt was created from thin air by the international banks. There was nothing backing the fiat dollar other than a forced promise posed on the American people to repay it. That money was created and thrivelessly wasted by corrupt politicians filling their pockets. It can be wiped clean when the Rothchild banking structure is eliminated. It has been a scam to charge the American taxpayer interest on a debt that was maliciously created for that purpose, sucking wealth out of the country.
Blinken has ties to the UN, HRC, Israel and Epstein, I wrote this up 6 months ago and seems relevant today if we are saving Israel for last.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1kD7Hov/our-current-secretary-of-state-a/
Good question, people are saying he needs to be sworn in as President before making recess appointments however, there is the whole Insurrection Act and CIC theory that has been floating around for a while. If this was made known to the public, we would be in uncharted territory
There was also a theory that Trump ended the United States Corporation and we reverted back to the original Constitution. Under the original Constitutional there were no limits on terms of service for the President. Two term limit came with the 22nd Amendment in 1951. It was theorized that by ending the Corporation, Trump would be eliminating the Federal Reserve Act and potentially every amendment after 1913. Opening the door for 45 - 47.
What if the government does shut down on Dec 20th and stays shut down for an entire month? The Democrats and RINO's thinking it may stop the Senate confirmation process and hurt Trump's ability to fill his cabinet positions.
Then Trump is sworn in on Jan 20th and makes his recess appointments.
You are correct, I just looked it up. So the senate confirmation process takes place between now and Jan 20th?
I also read the government must be in recess for 10 days before he can make recess appointments. This could bring in the 10 days of darnkess scenario.
Perhaps we get another CR for one month, takes us to Jan 20th and then the government shuts down. I'm just spit balling here.
Yes, I was thinking the same thing yesterday. The Brunson case popped its head up again simultaneously as McConnel announced he was having a secret vote for Senate majority leader.
I immediately thought Brunson case was being used as a threat or counter play against the RINO's to keep them in check.
The president can make recess appointments of cabinet members if the Senate is in recess and do so without Senate confirmation.
Article 2 section 3 grants the President the authority to adjourn Congress if the House and Senate cannot agree on a date of adjournment.
ArtII.S2.C3.1.1 Recess Appointments Power: Overview
The current government budget was passed on September 26, 2024. This continuing resolution provides funding for federal agencies through December 20, 2024.
I assume if a new budget is not agreed upon by Dec 20th, the government shuts down and Trump can make all the recess appointment he likes.
That is a good question. Reverse osmosis should remove it, if it is a good system.
Are the bottled water people adding it to the water, who knows. Would they tell you? It should be labeled on the bottle if they fluoridated the water I believe.
I have a good filter that removes fluoride hooked up to my refrigerator, so my ice cubes and water are flouride free. I dont like drinking out of plastic bottles, they say they is bad for you also. Micro plastics.
Article from 4 months ago:
UPDATE: The Brunson Brothers Case Is NOT Dead (with Loy Brunson)
https://wltreport.com/2024/07/01/update-brunson-brothers-case-is-not-dead-loy/
Fluoride in the tap water causes a calcification of the pineal gland in your brain. You can find many articles that claim there is a connection between fluoride and Alzheimer's disease. I myself think it may be causing the brain fog that everyone complains of. These symptoms progressively get worse as you age (consume more water) and is passed off as the natural aging process.
Decreasing your life expectancy is the ultimate goal of your elite rulers, they push depopulation of the planet, at every given chance. This is why abortion is so important to them.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15725334/
They say adding fluoride to the water protects your teeth. Bullshit!
If they are mandating biohazardous injections (covid vaccines), do you think they care about your teeth?
The type of fluoride they put in your water does not protect your teeth, it the wrong type of fluoride. It actually causes dental fluorosis which destroys your teeth. The fluoride they put in our water is from aluminum production or a byproduct of the phosphate fertilizer industry.
Studies out of Europe showed dental hygiene improved after the removal of fluoride from the drinking water.
This is why fluoride is such a huge topic right now, people are waking up.
There are good elements and bad elements in every organization, there are more of us than them. Deepstate tried to infiltrate every sector of society. Sending out their puppets to corrupt everything. Obama promoted these people to leadership positions while removing patriots from the equation. Yes, I agree that the evil infected the very institutions we should be entrusting. Unfortunately, there were casualties, they should have been stopped long before they could inflict any damage.
Instilling evil can happen quickly, removing it through legal means, through the criminal justice system, is a longer process. Q told us, for this operation to be successful it has to be done properly through the justice system, with no means to appeal the final outcome.
The UK–US extradition treaty of 2003 was implemented by the UK in the Extradition Act 2003 and came into force in April 2007 following its ratification by the US Senate in 2006.