5
kkuff 5 points ago +5 / -0

My state sends out applications for mail-in ballots to EVERYONE. I have heard that people are hanging on to them, not throwing them away, and bringing them to the poll when they go to vote in-person. That way, if they are told they already voted with a mail-in ballot, they can have proof that they never sent in the application.

Just something to keep in mind.

2
kkuff 2 points ago +2 / -0

I haven't read through the comments but here are my observations.

  1. At the 4:38 mark he said "...in 17 days..." He was talking about the upcoming elections. And he said it at the 1:33:13 mark.

  2. At the 1:00:00 mark he played the video of Jack Ass and all his flubs, which was followed by chants of "Joe's gotta go" and "Let's go Brandon"!

  3. Then at the 1:03:40 mark he talks about 4D chess, and states it 3 times.

  4. Lastly, I believe at the 1:49:38 mark he made the Q sign to someone in the audience, as he was leaving.

7
kkuff 7 points ago +7 / -0

I believe it was Pompeo that said those things, and that he is thinking of running for president, not Scavino. Pompeo has been making some REALLY weird comments.

1
kkuff 1 point ago +1 / -0

That may have been me!!! I mentioned it once in the chat!!!!

4
kkuff 4 points ago +4 / -0

My understanding is that the software was used specifically for poll workers and not voting. The reports I've read said that, although the contract specifically stated all workers' information was to be maintained in the US, it was maintained in China (thank you Greg and Katherine).

However, I am also aware that Fairfax Cty had some tomfoolery going on in 2020.

1
kkuff 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the email.

1
kkuff 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have tried changing my location on my computer, to no avail - I still get the spinning black circle. However, I did not restart my computer before I tried it.

1
kkuff 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks, I may change my VPN location.

5
kkuff 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, but thank you, that makes a lot of sense. I have not, nor will I, turn off my VPN, so I guess no Truth for me!

Thanks, Fren!

12
kkuff 12 points ago +12 / -0

Once the "President," always called the "President." Just like with Kennedy and Reagan and all the others.

7
kkuff 7 points ago +7 / -0

I haven't read the comments but my recollection is that he did NOT push the vaccines, he merely pushed FREEDOM TO CHOSE.

1
kkuff 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't, and will never, agree. A veteran is a veteran so long as they signed on the dotted line and served honorably.

5
kkuff 5 points ago +5 / -0

This was posted as a comment last night on Citizen Free Press. I've been praying for him since I learned about it.

1
kkuff 1 point ago +1 / -0

I disagree. I am a disabled vet without a day of combat.

I would guess you never served.

Your argument is littered with flaws.

8
kkuff 8 points ago +8 / -0

@Voteordie I'm with you. I live and work in that area. I know people that were involved in the clean-up. The fact that no one was hurt or killed is an outright LIE.

READERS: Prove me wrong.

2
kkuff 2 points ago +2 / -0

My answer to that question would be "NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS."

7
kkuff 7 points ago +7 / -0

I would say it is the latter. They probably drank the Kool Aid and are now having "issues."

1
kkuff 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have been saying for 40+ yrs that THE cure was locked up in someone's desk drawer, or safe, but big pharma would lose too much money so it would never see the light of day. How long will it take for this study to be debunked so we can go back to the status quo?

2
kkuff 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have responded to some Truths and people follow me afterwards. I sent a message to their support team asking how to make my account private but I didn't get a response.

2
kkuff 2 points ago +2 / -0

So, if he claims he wasn't representing anyone, then how can he say documents are protected by lawyer/client privilege? According to him, he wasn't representing anyone when he met with Baker; he was just being a good citizen.

3
kkuff 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have VPN on my iPhone and it has worked well.

1
kkuff 1 point ago +1 / -0

One MAJOR fault with this theory: if SCOTUS reverses R v W it only means that the burden is on the STATES to make abortion laws, not that abortion is banned in this country. R v W is all about a woman's RIGHT, from the Constitution, to get an abortion. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say or imply that. It is not like 1A, 2A, etc.

2
kkuff 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's GREAT! I just spent a weekend with a bunch of flaming libs and I was dropping truth bombs whenever I could. I can only hope and pray that some of them will wake up. Luckily, I'm not too close to them so whatever will be, will be.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›