6
krypt0 6 points ago +6 / -0

The idea is amazing. I do not like this version of the meme. The idea is golden. Ha ha it really is a good idea because we know they are short and by they I mean the demon worshipping canaanites that produce the adrenochome.

So in this spiritual war, let’s call on Christians to each purchase and hoard 30 pieces of silver. This is how Christians can go on the offensive. Everything in moderation though which is why individuals may want more, but as a calling we limit it to 30 pieces.

Those pieces can be 1 oz rounds and bars, they could be old quarters, dimes and dollars that were made of silver. Get 30 pieces of whatever silver and then hold it.

1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow!

I knew happy was spillin the beans but I have never seen this before. Was it released while he was alive and I just didn’t see it?

1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fren, when you chase down any one of these rabbit holes deep enough you find the same thing. Evil. Profound, grotesque, homicidal, evil.

That’s when I realized I’m not in this alone. I’m with God and once in awhile He calls on me do do some small part and I do.

When it comes right down to it and the demons are tormenting you, if you don’t have faith, you are lost my brother. How do you deal with the pain? The loss? The pressure?

Note also I didn’t say God was on my side. No. I’m on God’s side. The losses I encounter, the pain I have had to endure and the pressure I feel all have purpose because I am but one man doing his best to honor God and do his will.

1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

We should add her to a regular health and wellness check by random pedes.

Lol

Hey, jus checkin … you ded yet?

1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am not God, neither are you.

I am focused on more immediate concerns.

Do these people come to our side? Do these people double down because they fear consequences and then push the WHO new health regulations?

No matter how miserable a situation is, we can make choices to make it better or to make it worse.

Letting some of the psychopaths through so that the clueless idiots feel safe in switching sides is worth it. Don’t worry. When the clueless idiots realize how they were duped, how they have harmed themselves and their loved ones, then will want to pursue the psychopaths.

As the tide is turning, we want to encourage the clueless idiot, not scare them and persecute them.

1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s not a matter of judging it as genuine. It’s about getting capitulation from our enemies.

Would you rather they continue to double down on their evil ways?

2
krypt0 2 points ago +2 / -0

As much as I want that asshole to burn, it would do us well to grant him forgiveness and not behave as he did. We want them to come forward and admit thier wrong. The alternative is that they continue to gas light us and push the agenda.

1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Given the programming from school and culture I would not start him on the Israeli connections.

Instead start him on the physical evidence.

Ae911truth.org

Nothing doing on conspiracy stuff and everything to do with the physics of buildings and their collapse.

Once we see that the mainstream narrative is false; then we can look at who dun it. Going to who dun it first; and you will run into agent smith calling you an anti semite.

2
krypt0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Donald Duck! Hqhahahahahahha

Ok we have to meme this!

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t think so. It might have been able to heat up some small bit of steel, but look at the massive thermal mass and then compare that to the energy output of the office fires. Not nearly enough energy there.

Same goes for the amount of energy in the kerosene / jet fuel from the two planes in wtc 1 and wtc 2. Most of that fuel was burnt up on impact and while it would generate heat, that heat would be dissipated throughout the whole core and the steel skin for the towers. There is not enough energy there to do the damage we saw.

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Your claim about the energy available from the aluminum is arm waving; it would be interesting if you actually were able to produce numbers. “

No not my numbers, but the math was done and I remember seeing it in one of the architects and engineers for 911 truth presentations.

“ If you are going to call it a pyroclastic cloud, you can hardly deny its origins in a combustion environment. ”

Pre-planted explosives, not office fires.

“Failure of concrete in compression leads to fragmentation, shattering, crumbling, and spalling.”

Sure, but it does not lead to pulverization. If it was just a collapse without explosive force then we should have a stack of concrete pancakes. That’s not what we had. We had pyroclastic clouds and were left with concrete dust.

“ What are we talking about, now? The Twin Towers or WTC7?”

Pyroclastic clouds were observed with all three towers.

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

We are talking about wtc 7? Where is this aluminum coming from?

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you talking about the aluminum in the air plane? That makes no sense because even if you too all the the aluminum in that air plane and assumed a 100% conversion to energy and then looked at the energy requirement to pulverize all the concrete, it's nothing. Don't forget, the pyroclastic cloud that was generated. The resulting dust blew away on the wind and settled into a blanket all over that area of new york. I remember that dust layer being reported as 12 to 18 inches thick.

This is on the WTC 7 page "Furthermore, there are huge pyroclastic flows of dust, resembling a volcanic eruption, that poured into the streets following the final collapse of the building."

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/technical-articles/articles-by-ae911truth/101-free-fall-and-building-7-on-9-11

My understanding of the pyroclastic cloud is that the concrete was pulverised mid air and the resulting concrete dust formed the pyroclastic cloud.

Other wise, please show photographic evidence of the concrete slabs and chunks. I have not seen any of that in the photos.

10
krypt0 10 points ago +10 / -0

Hey guys! Sorry bout the Nazi shit.

We good now?

It's an honest mistake! You know, EVERYONE knows at least one literal nazi war vet friend. Right?

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

“ I'm not a skyscraper architect, so I am unacquainted with other cases,”

Nor am I, but I have listened to lectures by architects looking precisely at this issue. There are a couple of other examples of modern concrete and steel high rise building burning for extended periods of time. No collapse. No loss of structural integrity.

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

So this new theory of office fires causing structural steel to lose its strength so catastrophically that it resulted in the building falling straight down into the path of most resistance at free fall speed (for a few seconds) should have a major effect on the field of architecture. Given this new information architects must have studied this and changed how they design buildings so they don’t just collapse during an office fire.

What has the industry done with this new information?

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shock of what?

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

High temperatures resulting in loss of a steel columns ability to load bear would be a significant event.

Is there an example of this happening anywhere else in the world? Or is this the first time it had happened to your knowledge?

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh! it's the arrogant stupidity from a misguided person that is obviously intelligent and persistent.

ok ok

  1. This organization was created in 2007 and is populated with credentialed architects and engineers. What ever your credentials are (and no, assuming you are a fren, you do not want to reveal this online because of the cancel culture we are in, simply posting here may be cause for some people to cause you problems at work) we can reasonably agree that credentialled architects are able to comment on building that were standing one day, and not standing the next. https://www.ae911truth.org/

  2. in this discussion we do not stray into why things happened. There are all kinds of potential why's and so few hard facts to ground that conversation. So let's stick with just what did happen and what evidence substantiates that understanding of events.

  3. we take one issue at a time. This way we can fully explore a single issue while preventing the confusion of issues.

The first issue, is free fall in WTC 7. Please review this page. Please excuse my prior comments on freefall, I was saying them from memory. We will use what is printed here as the starting point for this discussion.

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/free-fall-acceleration

8
krypt0 8 points ago +8 / -0

One of us, not one of us, doesn't matter.

The use of accusations that have not been proven in court, to cancel someone is wrong.

In this way we have a lot in common with him because this is a strategy that has been used against us, and is currently being used against him.

This gives us the opportunity to seek unity with people who on other issues see themselves as our opponents.

Frenz! Making new frenz is a good thing. Then we truth action them mercilessly and wake em all up!

lol

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I am a bit of a "know it all." I was rated high for that in my performance reviews at work. "

It shows.

"But what I do know is solid;"

No. You are wrong, but you are highly confident in your ignorance.

"You, on the other hand, have no credentials"

You do not know this for a fact, yet you project this as a conclusion with great confidence. You are ignorant.

" and use this opportunity to throw insults at me."

Because it is a language you understand.

"The stupid and misguided ones are the Flat-Earthers, Moon-Hoaxers, space travel deniers, chemtrail hawkers, and orbiting DEW believers."

Are you evaluating information based upon information, or are you evaluating information within the filter of your prejudice and ignorance?

Don't bother, it was a rhetorical question.

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

“The video I watched of WTC7 showed a steady, undisturbed collapse with no shocks or expulsions of blast.“

Hey everyone!!! The guy that watched one video once is an expert.

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Took a quick look at your post history.

You a bit of a know it all and not at all worth engaging with. You should know, I think you are stupid and misguided, that’s if you are not here as cognitive infiltration.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›