Lol. Underrated.
don't underestimate the bounds of.clown world
I will prioritize my vote for those that have never held.political office. Fuck, I may run myself on those limited credentials...
They won't be able to walk the streets...
I don't support police. They are private security forces with authorization to take lives. I support sheriffs - they are elected. They"re obviously not immune to corruption and being "bad apples" but they aren't mercs.
Police will not.change until the risk of showing up to work is too high.
Firemen are the heroes. Their risk is high and they only.get the risk.
Fuck police, dea, FBI, state troopers, and with the greatest disrespect and abject disdain, the federal reserve police. If they all burned to death in front of their children, I would be sad I couldn't light the match.
(Not a.fireman, just appreciative )
If it ever did turn out to be a documentary, this is the part I want to be the most true and accurately portrayed.
Joke, bud. I.e. if they're dressed in maga gear to blame it on maga, flip the script.
I swear, this site has gone full glowie retard, abandoning all tropic thunder advice over the past few weeks.
Yes, fishing for my shill buddies by saying blame it on antifa...
Dye your hair blue and dress in black bloc.
The other way I have been able to resolve this.is to go.to a .win site where it says I am logged in. From that site, log out. This clears your SSO session. Then, you can usually log in at any .win site successfully.
I'm reading as either Lisa page, or pelosi tearing sotu
I think, with regards to Gitmo related stuff or executions, it's a waiting to see what's revealed, if ever, game.
There are the hints and nods.- scavino tweets of Eagle in ice, etc. - that can be interpreted but offer no eureka proof.
Trump is still fighting declas battles on lesser stuff, so I can't imagine irrefutable proof on Gitmo cases getting dropped, unless it all comes in a wave.
Then wait, I suppose. The entire premise of Q also rests on “you have to let everyone see“ in order to awaken. Not "here's this one thing," and “here's another," but a sewing of fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
For the lawyer members, have them think about it as casting doubt on the assertion (criminal) vs. what you're asking for which is a "preponderance of evidence,“ (civil).
Shift either your burden or their burden.
If an alarm goes off at 11:30am every day, prove to me without looking at the clock that it's not set to 11:30pm and the clock isn't set incorrectly. Or, accept that being set icorrectly is heresay but the alarm at 11:30 is true.
Are you looking for argumentative support or are you looking to refute by demanding standards for acceptance you haven't defined?
Hmm. 5:5, or 55?
Look to Twitter: Exactly this: "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us......." God bless.
Now we just need to get "they thought they were free“ to the top of the list
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01FKSNOSG/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_apa_i_lIO.FbZH1J8CK