(I think everyone knows it’s just, “Trump said so!” for 80+% of us
Make the case that it is imperative to second-guess what Trump wants. Why shouldn't Trump just asking for it be enough?
Knowing that
- there's a near unlimited amount of proofs that Trump is coordinating with Q
- you're on a Q board
- the premise is there's a plan in place
- there are hundreds of moves and counter moves the public isn't privy to
For all we know, Trump will recover trillions that were misspent through USAID.
For all we know, we'll go back on the gold standard and Trump is milking the federal reserve in the interim before the corporate US is declared bankrupt.
Hell, for all we know there could be a jubilee and all debts being vitiated because of the entirety of fraud that underpins the entire corrupt system.
I find the notion that we need to armchair-quarterback Trump's every decision to be silly, especially after 8 years of Q proofs demonstrating there actually is a plan and things are going in the right direction.
Anything else is blackpill.
Snowden is a clown traitor, according to Q.
Can we all sit back and appreciate how absolutely wrong the Jew haters were.
Every single one of them denounced Trump. Every single one of them drew a line in the sand declaring Iran off limits. It's mind-boggling what an incredibly non-deviating monolithic Borg they are.
Almost like they received marching orders or are all running the same NPC software.
You skipped they planned it.
I can predict I'll wear a blue shirt tomorrow. When tomorrow comes and I'm wearing a blue shirt, am I a prophet or a time traveler?
Super duper AI didn't tell us when McCain was going to die one month in advance, to the exact minute and calculating for daylight savings. That's just the date they scheduled to execute him. Simplest explanation.
Have you considered that they might be part of DARPA's 4+ billion budget? AI bots sent here to taint us all as Nazis by continually spouting Nazi rhetoric in our presence?
I could write an AI bot using ChatGPT to browse this forum, monitor threads and look for opportunities to make responses that tippy-toe the line of getting banned with anti-Jew rhetoric.
If I can do it, certainly DARPA with their 4 billion dollar budget can do it. It's not a stretch of the imagination that they're ahead of what is available to the public by 5 years.
The Jew-hating peanut gallery such a non-deviating Borg that it's not hard to imagine.
I think he's probably a patriot, as well as Tucker and Candice.
But the 4D chess moves are beyond their paygrade.
Fun fact: Steve Bannon was removed from Trump's administration when he came out against Trump's "Fire and Fury" positioning with NK.
You think he would have learned his lesson then.
Might as well put "I hated Jews so much I considered Iran an ally" on there.
Wait a minute.
All the Jew haters insisted that we were going to war permanently in Iran on behalf of Israel.
They insisted Trump was Israel's puppet, and that Trump was -- for the first time ever -- going to initiate a new deployment of US troops in the region, wasting hundreds of billions of our tax dollars in the process.
I don't understand. How could they have been wrong ... again? Certainly at some point they'll get something right?
Do you think that's what Uranium One is all about?
Maybe you should read some Q drops.
U1 = Uranium One. There's 39 drops for you to catch up on.
After you read them all, post your answer to the question, "Do you think the Clinton Foundation was working hard to generate electricity in Iran?"
That's called pace-and-leading.
You can't be good at controlled opposition if you don't throw bones to your target demographic.
No different than Mossad-agent Posobiec.
Massie isn't MAGA.
Wow, the Jew-hating peanut gallery was wrong again?
Yes, exactly.
Trump did Iran a favor by removing all doubt whether they could still have nuclear capabilities.
FFS, read some Q drops or something.
Uranium One ring a bell? You know ... Hillary supplying Iran with materials for nuclear weapons?
You are the one that has broken rules sir. "Civil Discussion ONLY: They want you divided.
Oh, you can read forum rules. Excellent.
I guess you skipped over the one that states Q supporters only.
No veteran of Q, after having survived 4chan, 8chan and Voat, has such delicate sensibilities that they consider my comments rude. Saying I'm not civil though, that is hilarious -- coming from the Jew hater peanut gallery. Again -- one trick pony, insult Jews.
Divided you attack each other
You've gone out of your way to state that you are not a Q follower, here on this Q forum. Why so divided? How can you be divided when you were never together in the first place?
However, it certainly is suspicious that dajews are not allowed to be criticized ever.
The Chinese have funded the overthrow of our elections. They're using Chinese students as spies, 3 million of them. Where is the anti-CCP peanut gallery chiming in on how much they absolutely loathe the Chinese at every opportunity imaginable?
Show me the threads about China that have "deleted", "deleted", "deleted", "deleted", "deleted", "deleted", "deleted", "deleted" in the comment section. Where are they?
Mulsims have set up no-go zones all over Europe. They have rape gangs. Now they're trying to set up Muslim-only cities in the US, where Sharia law governs the area. Where is the anti-Muslim peanut gallery explaining how they absolutely loath Muslims at every opportunity?
Neither of those groups exist. Why? We've given more money to Afghanis and Ukraine than we've given to Israel. Where are the anti-Afghani and anti-Ukraine peanut galleries?
Yet somehow, the Great Awakening has a swarm of Jew haters. The criticisms they are most vocal about are usually over the most pettiest of shit -- muh hat, muh nose, muh Talmud. They imagine muh Talmud is so incredibly evil, where is the peanut gallery criticizing the Quran? They don't exist -- yet equally bad shit is found in there.
Your group is so compelled to push this psyop that they consistently break forum rules, getting mole-whacked in nearly every thread on the forum having anything to do with Israel -- yet they persist, create a new account after getting banned and they're back.
It is unnatural behavior. It is a psyop. Those pushing this unnatural behavior are most likely DARPA AI bots, but I will concede there are also likely weak-minded fools who believed the psyop.
Sweeping generalization is a terrible argument.
You got to be kidding me. You -- what? Team "I hate Jews" is a one-trick pony. Their only argument is to make sweeping generalizations about Jews.
then by default I am not only hostile to Q ... My unsolicited advice is "Listen to all, follow none"
You are on a Q board, and after 8 years of Q's existence -- you're still here. But you're proselytizing to others that they should not follow Q. That is being hostile to Q.
Go find a leftist forum and tell people there they should not follow democrats and let me know how long your account lasts.
So yea, we're on the internet. Humans are pattern-recognizing creatures. I'm going to make broad assumptions about your positions based on pattern recognition I've gleaned from past arguments with thousands of Jew haters over the years. I might be wrong in some cases, but not that wrong.
For instance, you think discouraging people from following Q on a Q board isn't being hostile to Q. I think it is, so I my pattern-recognition still worked as intended.
Obvious AI bots are obvious.
4-year accounts developed for no other reason than to draw a line in the sand, clutch their pearls and declare Q a fraud when "Iran Next" came into play.
All the resistance I've seen against Trump's actions in Iran appear to be the peanut gallery who hate Jews. They drew a line in the sand and clutch their pearls that Trump would dare do anything in regards to Iran, as though they are some kind of ally -- even though Q said "Iran next" 7 times in drops.
You ask any of them to justify their stance and they uniformly claim Q isn't real. These are 4+ year accounts here at GAW. Very odd.
One thing in life is guaranteed. It's a solid streak run that hasn't deviated in hundreds of instances over the last 8 years.
If you hate Jews, somehow you also magically don't believe in Q and give a big fat zero deference to Trump. Every assumption about Trump is always worst case scenario imaginable.
Odd how it always works out that way.
Odd how it works out that not a single Jew hater, though they profess to be excellent researchers, can be convinced that Q is legit -- even with the mountain of proofs given.
Odd how Jew haters are only hostile to Q, even though Q addresses the Rothschild family, Soros, Mossad and Israel.
The best they can muster is Q is muh Operation Trust, which concedes that the message of Q is good (if it were only true) -- they simply won't believe it.
Also odd that the next logical step beyond Operation Trust is that Americans should have armed themselves and fought directly against the Trump administration, but they didn't because they were lulled into passivity. Very glowie.
Yet, believing it is the only shot you have. There's no plan B where Q isn't real yet you somehow have victory against Israel.
You represent the smallest demographic in existence -- hate Jews and also hates any believable plan that deals with the Jews.
Where's a single Jew hater who says "Q says they're going to deal with Israel. Q has targeted many Jewish targets I agree with, Rothschilds, Soros, Mossad and Mossad assets. They posted the "Why do they persecute me?" cartoon. They have demonstrated they are plausibly military intelligence and that they coordinate with Trump. You know what? I'm in -- let's see this plan unfold."?
I've yet to meet a single one. Odd. Almost like it's a massive psyop.
For all you know, Trump dismantled Israel's plans for perpetual war with Iran.
And if anyone should appreciate Trump's track record of averting war and not engaging in new US troop deployments, it should be you. If your hot take from observing Trump in office for five years is that he's a neocon that engages in war needlessly, your perspective is shit.
Just to engage in your concern trolling is to imagine that Q isn't real. If you've read all the Q drops and your conclusion is that Q is unnecessarily initiating wars, what are you even doing here?
If your hot take after 8 years of Q is that Trump isn't worth giving deference to vs Iran, you're an idiot.
You're treating Iran like it's a line in the sand that shall not be crossed. Q posted "Iran Next" 7 times.
So why are you so unhinged about it? Is it because you think that any enemy of Israel is your best friend?
Shitpost on patriots.win
My working theory is that Veterans Today was tasked by the CIA to come up with a loophole that allows Jews to be disparaged online.
We know that the democrats are fond of calling conservatives Nazis -- but there is no evidence of it. They were tasked with creating evidence for it.
But then, they also couldn't just come outright and start disparaging Jews in the midst of conservatives, because that would get them banned. Hence, the "Khazarian Mafia" was born.
After Q became increasingly popular, the KM conspiracy was associated with it to make it look like a Nazi movement. Flat Earth was associated to make us look like complete fools.
Even now, you know as well as I do, people who would just assume spout off against Jews -- they use Khazarian Mafia as a synonym just so they don't get banned.
And because Veterans Today is, at the end of the day, a psyop-pushing CIA asset, it is dual-tasked with making people hate Trump and other goals important to the CIA.
That's why I think someone who believes in the Khazarian Mafia -- who should otherwise be an ally because Q has several Jewish targets they will take down -- end up becoming hostile. Because Trump and Q are the CIA's worst nightmare.
That's why they're all-in on the existence of the Khazaria Mafia, as well as taking down Trump -- even though those goals are technically conflicting.
Who said I have a message?
I thought you had a message about the "hidden history of Ashkenazis" that you were concerned about.
That you didn't want it associated with the unhinged lunatics who coined the term "Khazarian Mafia".
You were worried that I was making the association. But now you're not worried? Good!
Glad we're on the same page.
Trump endorsed McCain.
Trump endorsed Romney.
Trump said he would join the Paris Accord if they make a few adjustments.
Trump said he would make a path for DACA dreamers to become citizens if democrats funded the wall.
We know that Trump hates McCain and Romney, that he wanted nothing to do with the Paris Accord and that he was never going to make a path for DACA dreamers to become citizens.
I think it's a mistake to judge Trump on anything in particular, because it makes no allowance for 3d chess moves.
If I had any problem at all with Biden's bill, it was mainly the pork going to NGOs. That's practically gone under Trump, so I don't see how Trump's bill could be comparable to Biden's.
And even when the money went to NGOs under Biden, I believe it was all recorded and those who took the money will have to give back the diamonds.