The superseding indictment was filed four year ago exactly.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/wikileaks-founder-charged-superseding-indictment
Does anyone have a link to any sort of official DoJ announcement?
The Wikileaks announcement drops [23] twice...
I think Kash Patel is on record as making similar comments. Can't seem to track them down at the moment though.
Assange currently looks like "the good one" of the two leakers, but I think it makes sense to hold out a final judgement on that as there could be layers of deception we can only imagine... After all, Snowden is chilling in Russia while Assange was in solitary, and if white hats are in control how much sense does that make?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ipOJOm3BqA
I won't say which one, but I feel a little bit more strongly about one than the other...but...and you probably understand that. I could have done it (folds arms) but I will say you have people on both sides of that issue--good people on both sides--and you have some bad people on one side, but I decided to let that one ride, to let the courts work it out, and I guess the courts are actually doing that.
Woke up early, had a bad dream about being on a plane.
Hit with the realization that some day soon in our lifetimes, we are going to restore/achieve self-governance.
One day we'll all just wake up and realize we don't need the TSA. It'll vanish overnight, and the conversation with our representatives will be almost perfunctory ("Did you get around to eliminating the TSA yet?"). All those stupid lines, wands, radiometers, agents... They'll be gone and we'll no longer be paying to subjugate ourselves.
The records on 9/11 will make it clear. We'll realize we killed and hated a lot of people for no reason, and trusted many who had already betrayed us.
A special counsel will be established and every month we'll see some of the worst of humanity finally brought to justice. Hopefully we learn a lesson for a while and will refuse to trade freedom for the illusion of safety.
The laws we are complaining about and fighting each other over will disappear with the remnants of artificial division & fear, with contention moving to the state level where it always belonged, and the Republic is restored.
My understanding is his play is something like:
-
Purchase a block of shares.
-
See if the block gets internalized by market makers (i.e. no price movement upwards)
-
If block is internalized, the order hasn't hit the market and market makers are using T+35 to fail to deliver. This creates opportunity because DFV has info that X shares must hit the market in T+35. To exploit this opportunity, DFV buys calls at multiple strikes that expire on or before T+35. These options are priced at a discount because market makers have fraudulently hidden his purchase.
-
Call purchase interest + shares needing to be found by for market makers creates upward momentum. The lowest strikes on the chain go in the money and he can then either exercise or sell to get more capital to feed the play before T+35. If FOMO hits then things really get wild.
====
The info that RK left us with is that he apparently bought shares rather than exercised calls on his latest YOLO update (if what is being said about how ETrade shows position value is true--I don't have ETrade so I cannot confirm).
So that would have kicked off another T+35 (assuming they internalized again). But we have GME's offerings so maybe hedgies won't have to commit fraud this cycle?
I'm skeptical that there is a life-changing play here, but rather that DFV has documented his play so that we can try to trade a long GME interest to better effect.
====
For reference.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/242.204
(2) If a participant of a registered clearing agency has a fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency in any equity security resulting from a sale of a security that a person is deemed to own pursuant to § 242.200 and that such person intends to deliver as soon as all restrictions on delivery have been removed, the participant shall, by no later than the begining of regular trading hours on the thirty-fifth consecutive calendar day following the trade date for the transaction, immediately close out the fail to deliver position by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity; or
(3) If a participant of a registered clearing agency has a fail to deliver position at a registered clearing agency in any equity security that is attributable to bona fide market making activities by a registered market maker, options market maker, or other market maker obligated to quote in the over-the-counter market, the participant shall by no later than the beginning of regular trading hours on the third consecutive settlement day following the settlement date, immediately close out the fail to deliver position by purchasing or borrowing securities of like kind and quantity.
Towards the end of the video he says the next thing we'd look for is more kitty call buys, perhaps this week. He is saying the calls were what made the price ramp up instead of just hiccup.
I don't see that there is a cheat sheet to infinite wealth here. Rather, Kitty is public broadcasting what he's doing and allowing us to see how the cabal reacts and position around it as we see fit.
"I move, you move."
So if we know he's made another bulk buy, and that there is a T35 delivery schedule, what is the best way to ride the sandworm with him?
Wait for him to buy his call options to gamma ramp and follow? Sell puts while the price and volume are suppressed? Sell covered calls on the next gamma ramp?
Initially I was more of yours and Clandestine's mindset on this. But I think I should have given LA more credit on the matter.
The decision for whether a TC display can stand is whether it has no secular legislative purpose. The secular legislative purpose here is the teaching of the history of public schooling and the fact that TC displays were once mandated. It's a somewhat slippery argument but it's an undeniable historical fact and interesting given how happy people are to dwell on slavery but unwilling to talk about the lost role of faith in our children's lives.
Secondly, there is a religious battle being fought over our schooling and we're fighting it with one hand tied behind our back. If secular individuals get their way on 100% of school processes and subject matter, then they are establishing their legally recognized religion on the school system. The very argument that they are projecting onto others.
We are seeing the results of letting them operate unchecked.
So it sounds like the angle they're gonna pursue on this is not that the commandments are being mandated, but that a document showing the commandments and the fact that they were once mandated is now..mandated.
Feels like distraction politics to me. Would be watching the other hand of that political body. What do they not want their constituents focused on?
u/#q23