1
montominco 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems like Israel flew their own flags, had many clear Israeli flyovers to lay claim that Egypt did it. Did Israel ever say Egypt did it? If it was a false flag there has gotta be evidence Israel tried to make it look like Egypt. Or if the US govt was trying to sell it was Egypt. Have you seen evidence of that?

1
montominco 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lots of reasons for 911. To get double insurance on the aged towers, the get the gold in building 7, to destroy evidence in building 7 and the towers, to start war in the middle east and to pass the patriot act and spy on all the citizenry and create a fear factory for overstepping for decades.

2
montominco 2 points ago +2 / -0

The part that was also installed from the beginning was altering the original plan for a jewish state to include the arabs in a two state permanent war. The land was considered militarily cleared and homesteaders allowed claim on both sides. This set up the region for permanent conflict. That conflict allows justification of many evils from many sides.

1
montominco 1 point ago +1 / -0

I still dont see a motive for Israel to just blow up a ship belonging to their aiding lapdag president. What is the point of it?

-1
montominco -1 points ago +1 / -2

In other words, the British are the first problem. The US and Israel lied to cover up. The soldiers on the Liberty were caught between. I wonder if the US won't speak up because they were not operating legally (NSA) or maybe the US military versus intel agencies were actually divided. Or some other cover up of deep state agendas. The US let it go on, that is indicative of some kind of divide in leadership. I think this will never be allowed come to light. But there has to be more to the story than people mention. What is the strategic value for Israel to intentionally hit the ship of an ally? Just because jews are dumb or evil, or because they needed the intel leak to stop? Is the president and the three letter agencies at odds with each other? Is Britain and the US playing both sides of the war? The guy in the interview that was on the ship mentioned Israel was targeting the antennas and the ship did not ultimately sink. I suppose the main support for this argument is what is the point of hitting the ally ship if not to stop intelligence leaking? Just for fun? But it also seems the US was at a war with itself to not help.

0
montominco 0 points ago +1 / -1

My understanding of the truth is that the Liberty was gathering intelligence (under command of the NSA) on radio locations (any person using radio in the area would be picked up including their locations). The Liberty was sharing this with the British who were making a working map of vehicle and troop locations as well as communications. The British were giving the same intel to the Arabs (because of some other prior agreements) who were able to pinpoint Israeli movements. After attacking the ship Israel began to turn the tide back to their favor. If the US made this known they would be selling out their British ally internationally. So they lied. This has been my understanding since the 90s.

1
montominco 1 point ago +3 / -2

I have understood from study that the Liberty was gathering intelligence (under command of the NSA) on radio locations (any person using radio would also give troop coordinates). The Liberty was sharing this with the British who were making a working map of vehicle and troop locations as well as communications. The British were giving the same intel to the Arabs (because of some other prior agreements) who were able to pinpoint Israeli locations. After attacking the ship Israel began to turn the tide back to their favor. If the US made this known they would be selling out their British ally internationally. So they lied. This has been my understanding since the 90s.

9
montominco 9 points ago +9 / -0

I was part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America. They rafted a bunch of denominations in "unity" and wanted to "allow" all the differences. Next thing you know every practice imaginable was the lowest common denominator. They lost half their congregants. A bunch of Methodist and Episcopalian Churches did the same thing within a decade. I have always understood it was demonic influence allowed by local church boards and a lot of 'educated' liberal commie types spearheading the operations under a banner of love and tolerance. I remember as a young kid my mom pleading 'Do not go against Biblical mandates, for the love of God! How can we be christian and allow this, we stand for nothing." We got out of there with a lot of other people. A lot of people in those other denominations have told me the same story.

2
montominco 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was thinking the same thing. Could have been that some warfare entt on to wrestle control (digital hack or personnel) of one or more devices. I also noticed no Cat5 hurricanes during Obamas terms until October 2016.

1
montominco 1 point ago +1 / -0

I listen to his version of the Star Spangled Banner every time I open youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W5i4KrghDw Didn't realize this Brazilian loved America so much.

4
montominco 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did somebody just summon Q? If Q came back to posting like the old days the left would lose it.

2
montominco 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is the case on the one I'm using now.

1
montominco 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am angered that Powell and Ellis never were allowed to present evidence. But they didn't have enough funds to get there. And really all of these cases have to play out in a timely enough fashion that Trump gets to play out before the election. So to me these people have to plead in order that Trump gets a timely trial. Perhaps if they don't plea they are not patriots, but are traitors helping the deep state stonewall justice for Trump. That's probably why they charged so many

5
montominco 5 points ago +5 / -0

Chuck Missler lived there from 2010-2018, then died. At least he didn't get to see both the USA and NZ fall apart in 2020. Probably thought America was on a nice upward trajectory. I looked into NZ for homesteading in the 90s but decided the people were even more liberal brainwashed there. Australia seemed like a good place, but they were obviously captured when they took the guns. Any place where the globalist elites capture the gov't isn't safe. Now there is nowhere safe to go.

2
montominco 2 points ago +2 / -0

I dont think Israel armed Hamas. But it sucks they let their people die. Seems to me this would be more like Pearl Harbor stand down to join ww2 than 9/11 plot. Assumption is they may have needed to mobilize against a greater threat. I dont think we have clear cut answers yet

1
montominco 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are really advertising for Qanon. People are going to re-hash pizzagate and ask if that was correct. Ask why the media dogs sex trafficking conspiracies so hard. People are gonna realize this ia a teue story and atart asking questions and waking up. When another mass of awakened people appear they are gonna do another round of poo-poo-ing reality and there will be two masses awakedened. They are their own worst enemy - may the Lord expose them to all and expose His wrath and bring freedom to thr captives

4
montominco 4 points ago +4 / -0

I remember at age 5 (1978) my parents let me ask the old farmers in a diner if this weather was the worst theyve seen and standing back while these farmers laid out the truly bad years. I figured it out early too.

8
montominco 8 points ago +8 / -0

I wonder what the glowies think of this? Do you guys know which side you're on? You're on the nukers' side, and we just want to enjoy life and not die, yet here you are hunting us for the pedo scrooges. What a bunch of faggotry you losers practice.

2
montominco 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ready to go, but doesn't exist as I understand it? Then they'd make up the rules as the 'emergency' required sudden implementation. The probably already have the emergency named. Then hold up the supply chain and food until you take the digital mark?

1
montominco 1 point ago +1 / -0

I assume that the plan of the elites is that all reserve currencies will be decimated at the same time, and the digital currency will be forced to replace all the others. I also assume they will have to force the world to take it by controlling the supply chain and world military. Because anybody who wants to can see they are destroying the economy on purpose.

2
montominco 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shia flew anti-Trump flag and had it on social media 24-7. People were having too much fun appearing live to cheer Trump or mock him. So he kept taking them off-line and doing something a bit different. So he put the flag in a private place streaming 24-7 with only flag and sky streaming, with sound. The pepe frogs, sun and airplanes allowed pinpointing the flag and it was down inside 24 hours

4
montominco 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjxKG4mR3U4 Apparently Mr. LaBeouf has Jesus in his life now. This is a win, even if his choice of Bishop Baron has some light lefty content in his sermons. Who knows maybe Shia will eventually come around on all fronts?

view more: Next ›