11
nowabeliever 11 points ago +12 / -1

First off, no one is a JUDGE, let's stop this obvious LIE and BS. The position is simply an "observer" one, per SCOTUS blog on the issue, and has absolutely no bearing on proceedings either way. Which leads to Point 3, below.

Second, the House "trial", or whatever the circus could/should be called, was illegal in a number of ways, not just one. Dershowitz pointed out at least 6 right off the bat. What kind of a "trial" does not allow the defendant to, well, DEFEND himself, to start with. Never you mind an illegal and fake charge t start with.

THIRD, and I already posted the info and links I don't know how many times here. SENATE, and ONLY the SENATE, sets the rules, in some cases to the minute (time allowed per Senator to speak). And SENATE, and ONLY the SENATE, decides what could be provided and allowed as evidence, and what could not. SENATE SETS ALL THE FUCKING RULES. No exceptions. Making that "presiding judge" position simply as an observer, per Point 1 above, and per SCOTUS blog as well.

All this fancy "analysis" of how Trump will proceed is, VERY UNFORTUNATELY, nothing more than a pipe dream for us. The second Trump's team veers off the libtards' "script" the mike will be cut off and some nonsensical "Senate rule" invoked. Bet on it, heavily.

And if anyone is still confused by the above, or simply doesn't like the hard facts I am presenting, PLEASE, READ THE FUCKING SENATE rules of IMPEACHMENT process first and try to comprehend what they say, and are. Do yourself a huge favor, and try to educate yourself on the matter that so affects us all.

Illegal charge? Libtards didn't care about the law. Illegal House impeachment "trial"? Libtards didn't care about the law. SCOTUS judge says he won't be present to give any credence to this illegal circus now in Senate? Libtards didn't care about the law.

And now so many somehow think that all of a sudden, by some unexplained miracle, libtards will wake up and allow Trump to actually defend himself. By going directly against everything ILLEGAL the libtards have pulled so far.

You are way better off cornering the market for bridges.

They WILL FAIL with the impeachment, ether way, and it doesn't matter. They are looking at A14 to censure right after. Again, I posted all of this info 2 nights ago IIRC, and you should research for yourself. Will it work? No one is sure, they WILL censure, of course, libtards piss on laws. Main and key question is, Will SCOTUS throw it out as they should? By law.

5
nowabeliever 5 points ago +5 / -0

FBI has a long list of way more visible pedos to go after, why after nobody in a cheap, 8 unit place? I don't buy any of the crap coming out of FBI these days. Seen this crap in Las Vegas 2 years ago, FBI covered up everything it could, and muzzled up everyone they could. Don't care what they claim.

If they really need a list of KNOWN pedos, one is readily available, right? Start with Pence and Roberts. Per Lin Wood, who openly stated that a number of times already and we haven't seen one defamation lawsuit yet. Why?

1
nowabeliever 1 point ago +1 / -0

END OF FRIGGING 2021! No one is really "stepping down".

8
nowabeliever 8 points ago +9 / -1

Discussed in another thread this morning. Fake news. Local cops would be arresting, not FBI. Something else was taking place and if FBI is involved be assured its not for our side.

At first they claimed child abuse. Now they claim child porn. By tomorrow expect yet another claim. Whatever. But nothing to do with what we think is right.

2
nowabeliever 2 points ago +2 / -0

Strange, isn't it, that so many are so deluded with this sort of thinking. Especially on this board.

3
nowabeliever 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd guess NONE. You're assuming FBI is all of a sudden doing their jobs, after decades of openly ignoring crimes. News media saying "violent crimes against children", and my first reaction would be "Why not LOCAL cops or sheriff dept.?" I call BS. And for now won't trust even the vapors coming out of anyone at FBI.

2
nowabeliever 2 points ago +2 / -0

If losing ability to earn a living through their outspoken views is an "act", then you really need to get out more.

7
nowabeliever 7 points ago +7 / -0

Eastwood is only "conservative" when it comes to his money. On most anything else he's light blue to dark blue. Recently spoke against guns, as one example. Lost all respect for him in the past 2 or so years.

6
nowabeliever 6 points ago +6 / -0

Vince Vaughn

Robert Davi

Scott Baio

Kelsey Grammer

Tom Selleck

James Caan

Gary Sinise

Tom Berenger

Paul Sorvino

Andy Garcia

Stallone

Dean Cain

Katee Sackhoff

Cole Hauser

Patricia Heaton

Jon Lovitz, was red pilled during Trump's run in 2016 after he made some statements and was duly run over by Hollyweird, no movies since

Wesley Snipes, red pilled, did time for refusing to pay taxes

Ice Cube, red pilled

Gina Carano

1
nowabeliever 1 point ago +1 / -0

They usually are. When you incorporate you must list an agent. SOP in business.

4
nowabeliever 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not to rain on anyone's parade, but didn't 10 GOPe Senators meet with him in the OO today?

5
nowabeliever 5 points ago +5 / -0

Zhou Bai Den is NOT dong anything save for drooling and changing Depends. often. Let's stop blaming a senile deranged and way out of his mind and family abused elder. Blame te real culprits, libtards and Pelosi, Chucky, etc.

The idiot was caught on tape saying "I have no idea what I'm signing". Do you seriously think he knows what day it is?

4
nowabeliever 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because for centuries (since the Mongolian invasion) the Ottoman Empire held Crimea and used it as base for raids into Russian stepps to rape, pillage and ENSLAVE. The only solution was to take it from the Turks. Turkey is still butt hurt over this and is still supporting tatars (mongols) and their claims to the land.

Hussein, in the Fall of 2014, listed a couple of RFPs on State Dept. site, not sure if they are still listed there these days, but both were online back then. Asking for proposals to staff and manage military ports in Crimea as well as build US run SCHOOLS for US military kids. That was a clear cue for Russia to take Crimea back. Crimea was Russian, taken by Russia, and in Russian hands until Khruschiov in 1958 "gifted" it to the then Republic of Ukraine by his "royal decree". Never mind that NO ONE EVER spoke ukrainian language there, at any time. ALL either ethnic Russians, or tatars (who Stalin sent to Siberia as punishment for avidly collaborating with Nazis during WWII). After the fall of USSR many tatars moved to Crimea, and although not happy to share it with Russians are definitely NOT looking forward to re-joining "Ukraine".

Imagine Mexico or Canada allowing China/Russia to build military bases on the border with Texas/CA/AZ or Vancouver. Would we tolerate this shit? Same thing will happen with what's called "Ukraine". A made up name by Lenin and Co. in 1914, who then in 1918 pieced together what were traditionally Russian lands of Malorossia and Novorossia, with further infusion of Galicia (Poland until 1939). Lugansk and Donetsk (or Donbas region altogether) started issuing Russian passports a little while back and voted recetly to join Russia. This is what used to be called Novorossia, for centuries, stretching South towards Crimea and Romania (Moldova now). Malorossia are lands near and around Kiev and abutting Belorus'. Galicia is land around city of L'vov and stratching a bit South towards Romania/Moldova.

Galicia lands were taken in 1939 and are now being contested by Poland, Hungary and Romania, with small portion already an autonomous even though no one wants to discuss it in Western news media. Its the land of Ruthians, olden ethnic Russians living there for 500-600 years now. As they put it to Kiev during junta takeover in 2015, "Do not come here, we have more guns than people."

1
nowabeliever 1 point ago +1 / -0

RE: "... Better to say it is used by people who do not want the government to be able to track and control their actions. "

Isn't that what I pointed out?

2
nowabeliever 2 points ago +3 / -1

Just how many times do I need to tell you people to stop your insane arguing on the subject that is clearly outside your analytical thinking and instead spend 10 minutes reading the Senate impeachment rules first. Read the damned thing, ask someone who can actually comprehend what it says to explain it to you before you pointlessly argue a losing side of the discussion. SENATE, and ONLY the frigging SENATE sets the rules, however they feel like. You see a SCOTUS judge presiding? Do you really think that openly ignoring the law and bringing this clown show will somehow stop them from running it any way they want, including suppression of any pro Trump facts and arguments?

They did not allow Trump to defend himself in the House to rule on the articles of impeachment. Against the law. Do you still think they will afford him any rights in the Senate now? They piss on the law, openly and frequently, and what you and I think (and assume) should happen, by law. By now, after days of this ridiculous liberal like whining of "but I want..." I have no idea how else to explain the reality we are facing. CONGRESS IS PISSING ON THE CONSTITUTION. There, is this clear enough?

Just how blind does one need to be not to see this circus for what it is?

Its a show for libtards, not for us. Read the Senate impeachment rules, its mind blowing to see so many arguing for hours while refusing to spend the 10 minutes on actually educating themselves on the subject. The ONLY rules that apply are the rules Senate sets for itself, any way they feel like. With GOPe McConnell on board.

And I am now seriously losing track of Trump's strategy. Why hire 2 criminal attorneys to run this shit show, one an Epstein hired dude and another who defended big time criminal bosses. Neither ever dealing with any Constitutional matters in prior cases.

2
nowabeliever 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lived in Las Vegas for a while, until last year. And every time we drove to KA for business/relatives we passed by the Ivanhoe solar power plant, at first watching it built and then go live. The plant was built, or rather heavily financed by Google, which also took a bunch of tax dollars to do this. A la Musk and Tesla. Not their monies, but our tax dollars. Though I am sure they do not share profits now with the said tax payers.

About 2 years ago, maybe longer, they were bitching about having problems with operations. Turns out the so called "self sustaining solar power" actually requires natural gas to operate. I kid you not.

What these idiots claim and what real life is are very distinct things.

1
nowabeliever 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lin Wood posted pretty much same things back around New Year's, this seems to be a re-post since his Twatter got nuked.

Sad to say, seemingly no file "owner" has come up yet? Password means nothing sans the files. Lizard Squad supposedly has/had the files.

0
nowabeliever 0 points ago +1 / -1

If you cannot comprehend when someone says you are full of shit, then my assessment of your single digit IQ was right on the money.

0
nowabeliever 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't see how you are any different than the OP. Both utterly brain washed morons with single digit IQ.

How's your bridge collection doing?

1
nowabeliever 1 point ago +2 / -1

You're saying that Moroccan and Yemeni Jews are white?

Asking for a friend.

3
nowabeliever 3 points ago +4 / -1

This exact argument would "prove" he incited the crowd for insurrection. Does anyone here actually try thinking once in a while?

-5
nowabeliever -5 points ago +2 / -7

He cannot. I know its a wet dream for so many, but the reality is that Senate runs the show, to a T. And to the minute in case of any senator wanting to make a statement. And won't allow any of it no matter what Trump's team wants, nor does.

Senate impeachment rules is a short, 20 pages long read. The only discussion, as you correctly stated, is incitement for insurrection". Mike will be muted for anything else.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›