Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

29
Can someone explain how Trump is gonna bring evidence of all the corruption during the Impeachment trial?
posted 5 years ago by Xirturn1984 5 years ago by Xirturn1984 +29 / -0

I thought he was being impeached for “high crimes and misdemeanors” from “inciting violence”. How will the Senate be able to accept all this information if it’s not in relation to the charges.

23 comments share
23 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (23)
sorted by:
▲ 9 ▼
– Distinger 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0

Enjoy the show.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– SwampRangers 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0

Read H.Res.24 on how he incited the riot:

President Trump repeatedly issued false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Wtf_socialismreally 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

"if we commit fraud and you challenge it that's inciting violence!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– CaptainChrisPBacon 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

He is going to bring several Box trucks full of documents. and start to read them.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Sabre2th 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

In the articles of impeachment, it states that he incited an insurrection "by falsely claiming election fraud". Wouldn't that make it his responsibility to PROVE fraud?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– nowabeliever 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

This exact argument would "prove" he incited the crowd for insurrection. Does anyone here actually try thinking once in a while?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– slokill 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

But the indictment states "false statements of election fraud" if the statements are true, and they sure are, then the insurrection is done by those accusing Trump of their crime. And they wouldn't legitimately have power. But I'm no attorney so I'm only guessing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– nowabeliever 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Just how many times do I need to tell you people to stop your insane arguing on the subject that is clearly outside your analytical thinking and instead spend 10 minutes reading the Senate impeachment rules first. Read the damned thing, ask someone who can actually comprehend what it says to explain it to you before you pointlessly argue a losing side of the discussion. SENATE, and ONLY the frigging SENATE sets the rules, however they feel like. You see a SCOTUS judge presiding? Do you really think that openly ignoring the law and bringing this clown show will somehow stop them from running it any way they want, including suppression of any pro Trump facts and arguments?

They did not allow Trump to defend himself in the House to rule on the articles of impeachment. Against the law. Do you still think they will afford him any rights in the Senate now? They piss on the law, openly and frequently, and what you and I think (and assume) should happen, by law. By now, after days of this ridiculous liberal like whining of "but I want..." I have no idea how else to explain the reality we are facing. CONGRESS IS PISSING ON THE CONSTITUTION. There, is this clear enough?

Just how blind does one need to be not to see this circus for what it is?

Its a show for libtards, not for us. Read the Senate impeachment rules, its mind blowing to see so many arguing for hours while refusing to spend the 10 minutes on actually educating themselves on the subject. The ONLY rules that apply are the rules Senate sets for itself, any way they feel like. With GOPe McConnell on board.

And I am now seriously losing track of Trump's strategy. Why hire 2 criminal attorneys to run this shit show, one an Epstein hired dude and another who defended big time criminal bosses. Neither ever dealing with any Constitutional matters in prior cases.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– lilree 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

u type all tht text but y no Trump just prove the fraud

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– slokill 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Yes. This will be a kangaroo court. I agree that this is unconstitutional. The whole election thing is moot until the fraud is accepted, justice is meted to those responsible and complicit, and votes become meaningful again.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Deaf_MAGA_Pede 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

If they won't follow the law, why should he? He's gonna say, "Naw fuck them muthafuckers, I'm going to present what I think America as well as the world need to see!" because I believe this will be televised.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SaltyFlorida 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

I think the leftist opinion is by him telling the rally the election was stolen and there was massive fraud incited the violence. If that’s the argument, proving there was election fraud would deboonk that. You can’t say he incited a riot by speaking total truths to a crowd

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TheConservationist 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Well, you could come up with some scenarios where truth, or perceived truth, incites violence.

That's not the case here, but, I'm not sure how much it strengthens Trump's case to prove the fraud. Now, if he's not worried about being impeached, regardless of what they say, because he has the votes, then maybe he'd take the opportunity to show the evidence, alluding to the fact that it relates to their "charges".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– nowabeliever 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

He cannot. I know its a wet dream for so many, but the reality is that Senate runs the show, to a T. And to the minute in case of any senator wanting to make a statement. And won't allow any of it no matter what Trump's team wants, nor does.

Senate impeachment rules is a short, 20 pages long read. The only discussion, as you correctly stated, is incitement for insurrection". Mike will be muted for anything else.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Zoepop 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Um, no. Did you watch the first impeachment? Many topics, seemingly far a field, were introduced. As long as evidence is germane to , or rebuts the charge, great latitude is the norm. I remember clinton's impeachmernt...it was a cornucopia of tangents.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– nowabeliever 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

We'll compare notes in due time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Longhairedzombie 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

When you are strong, appear weak.

permalink parent save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy