3
orangetastic1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Boo hoo.

The whole point of threatening a tariff is to make sitting on your ass under the status quo more painful than doing what you're supposed to be doing.

So just do what you should and the tariff won't be a thing.

Even a commie should be able to figure this out.

2
orangetastic1 2 points ago +2 / -0

First thing I thought when I saw the pic.

These are the same people who have gun "accidents".

11
orangetastic1 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm so sick of that word and the pretentious assholes who use it.

7
orangetastic1 7 points ago +7 / -0

This had to be written by a libtard projecting again.

6
orangetastic1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Let's not forget that Joe and his administration could address this now and save those children, and being a lame duck, they could do it with almost no political cost from their deranged followers.

But they won't. Mostly because they're sick freaks.

1
orangetastic1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just MHO, but personal security is a double-edged sword.

If they're quality people who you can trust, they can be invaluable.

But if everyone's looking for those same type of people at the same time, well there just aren't that many to go around.

A compromised person (WH or BH) in that intimate position can end up being a bigger vulnerability than not having security at all.

3
orangetastic1 3 points ago +3 / -0

"It is understood the Kurt Fellows had been collecting used sex toys from like minded women in the Montana area..."

Not the hero we deserved, but the hero we needed.

1
orangetastic1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know that 29% is totally inappropriate. Some people are huge credit risks and a low limit with a high interest rate is the only way to extend credit.

The problem is that the average cc user most likely isn't anything close to risky enough to justify those interest rates and ,in fact, it's the high rate that causes them to become the risk of anything goes South in their life.

1
orangetastic1 1 point ago +4 / -3

Being raised Catholic, I never understood taking the Bible literally when not only is the English version typically a translation of a translation, but it's also a compendium decided by committee. Maybe if you were reading from one of the original manuscripts in the original language - most of which don't exist.

Just as an example, this scripture would seem to prohibit calling your own father "father" if taken completely literally.

2
orangetastic1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tay Tay ought to be a little more careful. It's not a big leap to go from executing CEOs to executing those with generational wealth, like her.

20
orangetastic1 20 points ago +24 / -4

This crap is why I no longer consider myself a member of the Catholic Church. That org isn't Catholic anymore, it's not even Christian. I'm not even sure I'd call it a church any more.

5
orangetastic1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Europe? Shouldn't they be moving somewhere that's majority POC to demonstrate their lack of racisms?

I guess if they wait long enough, Europe will eventually be POC-majority...

5
orangetastic1 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's no lady.

That's Jill Biden.

4
orangetastic1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Were books bound like that 1500 years ago? I thought scrolls were the dominant form until about 400 years ago but it's not something I've researched heavily.

2
orangetastic1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't have any advice that hasn't already been posted.

Will say that my Dad got very aggressive cancer before I was fully awake and engaged on this site. Didn't last a year with the treatment - had no symptoms until diagnosed.

I wish I had known about some of these protocols back then. Maybe they wouldn't have helped, but we'll never know. And I'm certain the chemo made the last months of his life miserable.

I sometimes wonder if death by cancer is all that much worse than the death by chemo so many people get instead.

12
orangetastic1 12 points ago +12 / -0

But didn't her hero - Barack Obama - "fix" healthcare just a few short years ago?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›