Nice try. You repeating the buzzword "grand solar minimum" doesn't make you an expert on the subject matter. You haven't connected solar minimum to what's happening in Texas at all. You've just repeated "grand solar minimum" therefore concluded the snowpocalypse is expected. Wrong.
Scientists have not predicted a mini ice age; they've simply predicted something strange happening with the sun. This is the solar minimum. Minimal sunspots and flares is not equivalent to a mini ice age. You have not connected the dots that one causes the other and are making false assumptions.
Many credible scientists claim that the solar minimum will not cause a mini ice age and that this is a myth.
"The warming caused by the greenhouse gas emissions from the human burning of fossil fuels is six times greater than the possible decades-long cooling from a prolonged Grand Solar Minimum," wrote the NASA Global Climate Change team in February.
"Even if a Grand Solar Minimum were to last a century, global temperatures would continue to warm. Because more factors than just variations in the Sun's output change global temperatures on Earth, the most dominant of those today being the warming coming from human-induced greenhouse gas emissions."
Here's the article source: https://www.sciencealert.com/we-re-about-to-experience-solar-minimum-here-s-what-that-really-means
"We have not predicted a little ice age... We have predicted something going on with the sun."
Here's the video source: https://youtu.be/IQHqgdvXTxE
TL;DR: The solar minimum is basically a decrease in sunspots and flares and thus a decrease in solar ultraviolet radiation. This occurrence would not trigger a mini ice age or freezing temperatures in normally warm places. Peer-reviewed research, physics, and math all tell us that a grand solar minimum would have no more than a 0.3°C cooling effect, barely enough to put a dent in human-caused global warming.
https://skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=448
The solar minimum creating a mini ice age is a myth created and perpetuated by people who don't know what they're talking about.
You predicting a mini ice age is not equivalent to the movement of polar vortex targeting half of the united states. The weather pattern was abnormal. If you were a good meteorologist you would've recognized the abnormal movement patterns. Saying you're a meteorologist doesn't give you credibility. There are good ones and bad ones.
EDIT: I debunk 420-Trump-2020's false, erroneous claims here: https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRZddfIO/x/c/4Dx5HlZHFA1
Also, I don’t know all too much about Aung San Suu Kyi specifically, but her father was a member of the Burmese Communist and Socialist parties. So there’s that.
That tells you all you need to know. Saying "there's that" is marginalizing this very crucial fact. If you look at the background and history of all the communist leaders today that are part of the cabal, they have a family member who was a communist or criminal.
He's already putting up dummy. It's happening little by little. Notice the indictments, the arrests, the military taking over govts in other countries, the allegiance with other countries. You're a blind ignorant dummy if you think nothings happening.
Did you know Tesla formed a secret society called Plus Ultra. They were a group of inventors, scientists, architects, and writers focused on creating a better future for mankind. I'm not sure but Trump may be part of this society.
OP is a fucking lying piece of shit lying by omission! He knowingly put his affiliate link there so he could make money. But then states a truth "i genuinely bought this ebook and thought people would like it" to act innocent. That's not the point of contention you fucking lying faggot.
The point of contention is that you are deceiving by omitting the fact that you are using your affiliate link to earn money. In other words, you have a hidden agenda behind your post. You are a lying faggot.
A military chopper crashed at the finger lakes area in NY State with 3 NG deaths. The finger lakes resemble Hunter's back tattoo. Decode the connection.
Choppers: https://pic8.co/sh/BB19m0.png
You only got one part right. Q is indeed Trump, but Bannon was a leaker and traitor that got fired. Bannon may speak positively about Trump but it's because his business largely depends on it. He's not really a good guy.
Alex Jones is a fat loudmouthed mossad kike. He's a honeypot for speaking enough truths to bait you in. Then he flips the script on you once you follow him. Anyone who follows him is weak-minded. Get a brain and wise up.
Theory makes sense. Why else would they wait when they can cancel Parler in a matter of minutes. They're trying to locate him. However, on the 6th he was at the capital giving his speech, so he did show for that part. What do you mean by he didn't show?
Most think the inner qualities of a person doesn't reflect how you look on the outside. They're wrong, it totally does. Never trust ugly people. If they're ugly they usually have lower self-esteem and hate themselves. They then take this self-hatred out on others. Fuck ugly people.