I agree with most all of your conclusions. Regarding the data, my understanding is the 42K are voluntarily submitted case reports. They are likely a subset of VAERS and subject to the same limitations of interpretation.

I think 42086 is the number of case reports (people) as shown in Table 1 and then 93473 is the number of AEs as at the bottom of Table 2. Each person can have more than one AE.

My understanding is that the PCR-based tests are not necessarily flawed, they are just carried out and thresholded to allow for a lot of false positives, including even non-COVID viruses. The good flip side of this is that the same tests must then have a low false negative rate, so the small numbers in Japan and India are very likely legit.

He is somehow assigning a single date to each batch and making that his x-axis upon which all of his results depend. In the data I only see dates for each individual vaccination, not a date a vax lot was issued. I tried taking the mininum and the mean of the individual dates for each VAX_LOT but my plots look nothing like his. Mine are much more spread out with Pfizer and Moderna distributed across all of 2021. I am including the non-domestic data in order to get the fullest picture possible. He needs to provide more details on how to reproduce what he did to support his remarks. Many folks are happy to jump to the most nefarious conclusions without rigorous backing.

Excellent point about the batch sizes--we have no clear way of knowing what they are and can only guess from what we see across VAERS. This distribution of adverse event counts is highly skewed. I'm also trying to reproduce his analysis but no luck so far. The VAERS data are split across multiple files, and I presume the variable VAX_LOT is what he is using to assign batches. Another key question is: How is batch date assigned? The dates form his x-axis which underlies pretty much everything he concludes. We have VAX_DATE for each row (VAERS_ID), but these vary for each VAX_LOT. I tried both min date and mean date but am not getting plots anything close to what he showed. I am including the non-domestic data to get the fullest picture.

A report from The Hill four days ago about the same year-long UK study: https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/579068-vaccinated-just-as-likely-to-spread-delta-variant-as-unvaccinated-study

Wow, thanks for posting, those are three embarrassingly bad reasons. Aussie pedes stand firm and I hope underground sources are readily available.

I've analyzed VAERS data extensively and have found no evidence of any form of substantial misreporting. Who would be doing this? It's a pain to enter events into the system and the data do undergo some basic cleaning, e.g. removing duplicates and verifying deaths. If you have it, please provide sauce behind your mistrust or a reasoned critique of Steve Kirsch & team's calculations of ~150K deaths due to the vaccines based on VAERS.

I presume the fetal cell argument remains legit but wanted to note my form asked if I was taking or had taken any of a series of common meds that presumably also were developed with fetal cells, which seemed to be an attempt to catch me in an inconsistency. I took a more direct religiously nuanced approach.

Here is the main part of my letter:

We are in a time of intense political divide, censorship, and misinformation, with radically different narratives and interpretations proffered by well-credentialed scientists and experts. As a Christian first, I am obligated to remain faithful to my core beliefs and utilize every skill at my disposal to cut through masses of confusing news sources and data and take positions and actions that honor God.

My professional activities are established upon the aforementioned core values as well as religious convictions to not defile my body (1 Corinthians 3:16-17, 6:19, 8:7; 2 Corinthians 7:1) nor allow others to dictate my freedoms as based on God’s laws as outlined in the Bible. These foundational beliefs along with my scientific studies and analyses of original source data and numerous publications have led me to conclude that current COVID and related vaccines and boosters are inappropriate for me.

As shown in the The Myth of Religious Neutrality, everyone ultimately considers something to be divine and thereby operates upon some form of religious presuppositions. My religious convictions underlie everything I do, including science and data analysis. I am fully prepared to offer an extensive scientific and data-based defense of my current position, but I understand the purpose of this form is to focus on my sincerely held religious beliefs, and so I limit discussion to them.

Under a Christian worldview, honest evaluation of important topics like vaccines reveals God’s glory and truth in His Creation and should shine past any attempts at political exploitation or obfuscation. For me, high-quality and unbiased science is a form of religious expression as I seek to know and understand My Creator and what is truly going on in our world. At the same time, I believe strong forces of evil exist that promote false narratives and distortions of the truth designed to harm Christians, innocent citizens, and the traditionally conservative Christian-based moral foundations of the United States.

I hereby assert my right to a religious exemption from vaccination. I am objecting to these vaccines because I believe in and follow God and the principles laid out in His Word, which include both faithfulness to that Word as well as honest and unbiased consideration of available science and data. I have a deeply held belief that my partaking of these vaccines violates these principles. I believe my body is a temple for the Holy Spirit, and furthermore that “God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind” (2 Timothy 1:7). It is my God-given responsibility and requirement to protect the physical integrity of my body against harmful intakes and to seek truth and righteousness amidst battles between good and evil.

I make this assertion for the glory of God the Father and His Beloved Son Jesus Christ, My Savior, as consistent with my faith which I am grateful to share with you. Thank you for your consideration of it.

My religious exemption was just approved at my midsized company (tech industry). I quoted common Biblical texts and did not appeal to fetal cell research. They key point appears to be a sincere religious belief. Per Roy Clouser's book Myth of Religious Neutrality, everyone operates under some religious worldview. Here are more links for legal advice. The video by Mat Staver at the first one is good.

1. Liberty Counsel https://lc.org/

2. Liberty Institute https://www.libertyinstitute.org/about/faq

3. Pacific Justice Institute https://www.secure.pacificjustice.org/site/SPageNavigator/contact_us.html

4. Advocates For Faith and Freedom https://faith-freedom.com/

5. Alliance Defending Freedom https://adflegal.org/about-us

6. National Legal Foundation https://nationallegalfoundation.org/

7. Thomas More Law Center https://www.thomasmore.org/

8. Thomas More Society https://thomasmoresociety.org/

9. Christian Legal Society https://www.christianlegalsociety.org/

10. American Center for Law and Justice https://aclj.org/

11. Center for Law and Religious Freedom https://www.clsreligiousfreedom.org/about-center

12. Christian Attorneys of America https://christianattorneysofamerica.com/

13. Christian Law Association https://www.christianlaw.org/

14. National Association of Christian Lawmakers https://christianlawmakers.com/

15. Pacific Legal Foundation https://pacificlegal.org/

A lot of his videos (usually interviews by others) are on rumble and he also has a telegram channel: https://t.me/RealGeneDecode

It was likely Gene Decode.

Quote from NEJM England study on Delta variant https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108891 : Vaccination status was categorized as receipt of one dose of vaccine among persons who had symptom onset occurring 21 days or more after receipt of the first dose up to the day before the second dose was received, as receipt of the second dose among persons who had symptom onset occurring 14 days or more after receipt of the second dose, and as receipt of the first or second dose among persons with symptom onset occurring 21 days or more after the receipt of the first dose (including any period after the receipt of the second dose).

Diamond hands

thanks! note the graphs end in sept 2020--would be great to see an updated version

This massive Phase IV trial needs a lot of placebos.

Something weird is going on. This site provides genomic sequences of over 1 million hCoV-19 cases: https://www.gisaid.org/

This site provides viral genomic sequences of over 1 million hCoV-19 samples https://www.gisaid.org/

Go Wolfpack!

https://thecovidblog.com/

https://vaccineimpact.com/

https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

https://patriots.win/p/12i3zMhFqx/fixing-the-2020-election-remains/

Agree, but he should have added election integrity. We must not become distracted from fixing voter fraud. What Miller mentions for individuals is happening at the state level to Georgia for this very issue.

Wonder if Crowder's case against Facebook could serve as a template for class actions for those harmed by censoring. Also wonder if Lindell's counter suit against Dominion could be expanded into a massive nationwide class-action suit around voter fraud. Something so big the courts could not dismiss it. Would class actions of individuals carry more weight with the courts than the state-level suits that Texas and others did?

https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRQHTDzE/paper-voting-reform-proposal-/