Learn the data, this kind of post makes us look stupid. The 6+k deaths are in the USA. You need to remove the usa filter and go global to get the 13+k deaths. Non USA deaths caused by us manufactured jabs get reported into vaers. CDC statement is accurate (or as accurate as vaers data is).
Again, sad this was upvoted so much on a site where so many claim to be great researchers.
“ That sentence sounds to me like it was written by an intern that didn't understand what the person in charge was saying. ”
good one
I wish you could hear the sarcasm every time I type the optimized codons for improved anitigen expression. I’m not really making any technical argument, I’m just kind of being an ass throwing ‘their words’ back.
I don’t doubt the two drugs are interchangeable, even the documents say so, however the two are LEGALLY distinct, and only comirnity was approved. The better question would be, why wasn’t the Pfizer-Biontech Covid-19 Vaccine also approved? I don’t think we’re looking at much of a technical argument here, other than clarifying they are different (the codons man😄), and the docs clarify they are different but have similar safety attributes. This IS a legal slight of hand convincing employers and employees they are dealing with an approved vax, when they aren’t, or at least until there’s a supply of comirnaty.
I personally use commiRnaughty. I believe this is only a mechanism to buy time,until/if comirnaty shows up in the US. I did some searches and see no press deleases of shipments and find none available in the US. Using this argument might also wake some folks that this was a giant psyop to encourage mandating unnaproved vaxes.
Now that I'm going through the detail of your reply - I question if your a troll. Several ingredients are redacted on page 7 so there's absolutely no way for you to check that the ingredients are the same. Do you have the ability to unredact the ingredients? The FDA paper clarified they used the same antigen encoding, which yes would be the same. But don't forget about those optimized codons man.
Great research. Over the course of the day I have found evidence that Comirnaty is used outside the US (Germany and Australia so far). Based on your research, and weasel wording in the FDA announcement, I think they might have the exact same formulation.
Here's why this is still smoke in mirrors:
- If the FDA wanted to approve Pfizer's vaccine, they would have. Instead, on Aug 23 they sent Pfizer a letter simply extending the EUA on the existing vaccine, and notifying them that they had provided BionTech with an approval for Comirnaty.: Here's the letter to Pfizer, https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
Here's the updated (as of Aug 23) fact sheet for the 'Pfizer Vaccine' which even lists Comirnaty as an FDA approved alternative. The words emergency use authorization appears 12 times. https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
The FDA was very weaserly here, intentionally announcing these drugs can be used interchangeably (which they very well might), but specifically held in place the EUA for the only vaccine available in the United States. This could be for a number of reasons:
- The FDA approval process did not need to review the VAERS data, because Comirnaty is not in the VAERS database as it's not US manufactured. Had they tried approving BNT162B2, they would have had to address the thousands of deaths and other serious adverse effects reported. Since the US doesn't have any reports of deaths/adverse reactions to Comirnaty, go ahead and approve away. After all it has the presence of optimized codons for improved antigen expression.
- Everyone who is being fooled into thinking the Pfizer Vaccine is FDA approved will be shocked if they need to file a claim. Because it's under EUA you can't use the standard National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, but instead use the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program created for vaccine immunity under the Prep Act.
Bottom line, this looks like smoke in mirrors to me. Please let me know if you can find evidence of a single dose of Comirnaty in the United States for use. This is simply to 'fool' as many as possible that the FDA approved the Pfizer vax, so mandate away without fear.
These people are stupid.
They approved a vax that I’m pretty sure nobody in the United States can get. So misleading. Media is culpable for pushing the lie that the Pfizer vax (implying bnt162b2) is approved so begin the mandates. I believe you can buy time demanding the fda approved jab. Anyone says they’re the same - clarify that you need the jab witb optimized codons! Who would want a jab that’s unnaproved witb suboptimal codons! (I’m laughing as I write this).
So I read the paper
Vaxxed 2.5x more likely to experience myocarditis Unvaxxed who catch covid 18x more likely to experience myocarditis
This should actually be good pr for the jab. Don’t know why malone would push this paper
The paper NEVER claims the vaccinated carry 251x the viral load of the unvaccinated. The paper states - copy paste - “ Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020. ”
Because what they say will be used against them in a court of Law……Durham