The FDA intentionally wrote their Pfizer EUA re-issuance and Comirnaty approval letters to be confusing word salads so 1) the media would (complicitly) report on it as a full approval, 2) peeps would blindly believe the jab was fully approved and 3) many who were "hesitant" would give up and take the jab before it was made known that there was no full approval for the (US) Pfizer jab.
And your (3) was to use up the existing vaccine stock they had already released - they expected a lot of (hesitant) people to jump into the jab line with pharma's big push for the jab but I'm guessing that didn't happen in the numbers they were hoping for. Now they have all this ineffective product floating around not making them more money. Ineffective always, but now especially with "Delta" that needs a whole new booster product, and people will figure out (even the ones that believe the original jab was effective) that the original jab no longer works (and we all know it never did). I expect them to unload it on the veterinary world soon to try to squeeze more dollars out of NPCs.
Military, share this with the extremist leaders, that you will not take forcibly or otherwise an EUA, drug. Tell them to go to hell or discharge you from active duty. Your life is more important than their blind, woke orders.
Furthermore, the shield of protection from litigation is nonexistent for Comirnaty. It was (imo) the wink, wink between Pfizer and the FDA. If you got injected with Comirnaty and had an adverse reaction, you could sue. If you get US Pfizer Covid vax, it is still under shield of protection from litigation AND it is still EUA! I called multiple pharmacies to request a Comirnaty shot. None of them knew what I was talking about. None of them had heard of Comirnaty. And none of them actually had Comirnaty, but every pharmacist told me they have the FDA approved Pfizer vax. I had to even spell its name for all of them. Comirnaty is not even being manufactured for distribution, and there is no website advertising it, either. Hmmmmm
This is a really good source for explaining the intentional confusion in regards to the FDA giving out intentionally misleading information on the clot shots. It also reveals the complicit MSM and their conspiracy to push propaganda. Downloaded the full letter for distribution to normies to coat the red pill to make it easier to swallow.
This is exactly what I've read with the release from the FDA this sums it up nicely. Silly wording makes it confusing to most. I saw through tge tricky wording and was telling my coworkers and showing them the tricky wording.
Not only is it not approved, but it’s not even being manufactured for distribution. On top of that, pharmacists, businesses, and the general public are all under the FALSE belief that it is fully approved. Each pharmacist I called told me repeatedly that it was the same thing as the current Pfizer vaccination. I said it is definitely not 100% the same. It is almost the same, but the biggest difference of all is that the one that you have been giving is protected from litigation. The one that is FDA approved is not protected from litigation. Besides a few minor unknown, unspecified ingredients that are yet to be identified, the litigation thing is a huge difference!! This card trick that Pfizer & the FDA are playing also gives cover for all of the mandates that rolled out like a steamroller. It’s fraud, and it’s absolutely criminal!!
The FDA intentionally wrote their Pfizer EUA re-issuance and Comirnaty approval letters to be confusing word salads so 1) the media would (complicitly) report on it as a full approval, 2) peeps would blindly believe the jab was fully approved and 3) many who were "hesitant" would give up and take the jab before it was made known that there was no full approval for the (US) Pfizer jab.
Combine with Biden’s new EO mandating vax for all Fed contractors and military. Hmm?
And your (3) was to use up the existing vaccine stock they had already released - they expected a lot of (hesitant) people to jump into the jab line with pharma's big push for the jab but I'm guessing that didn't happen in the numbers they were hoping for. Now they have all this ineffective product floating around not making them more money. Ineffective always, but now especially with "Delta" that needs a whole new booster product, and people will figure out (even the ones that believe the original jab was effective) that the original jab no longer works (and we all know it never did). I expect them to unload it on the veterinary world soon to try to squeeze more dollars out of NPCs.
Good pun. very apt.
These fuckers need to go down. Like yesterday.
I’m with you!
Full letter:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2021-08-26-Letter-to-FDA-re-Comirnaty.pdf
Journalist are literate. They just do what theybare told. However, why is fda approving a vax for Europe?
Pls see post context.
Military, share this with the extremist leaders, that you will not take forcibly or otherwise an EUA, drug. Tell them to go to hell or discharge you from active duty. Your life is more important than their blind, woke orders.
COMIRNATY (anag) = ACRONYM IT
Hmmm.
Furthermore, the shield of protection from litigation is nonexistent for Comirnaty. It was (imo) the wink, wink between Pfizer and the FDA. If you got injected with Comirnaty and had an adverse reaction, you could sue. If you get US Pfizer Covid vax, it is still under shield of protection from litigation AND it is still EUA! I called multiple pharmacies to request a Comirnaty shot. None of them knew what I was talking about. None of them had heard of Comirnaty. And none of them actually had Comirnaty, but every pharmacist told me they have the FDA approved Pfizer vax. I had to even spell its name for all of them. Comirnaty is not even being manufactured for distribution, and there is no website advertising it, either. Hmmmmm
Why are people putting so much energy into this approved, not approved bullshit? Who cares? They can’t mandate it either way.
Your posts are always important. Thx Fren
Do you have a link to this letter from Sen. Johson’s site? I wasn’t able to find this particular letter. Thanks in advance.
Where’s the rest of the letter?
Girl’s last name is WOODCOCK....
And nobody comments about that? What are y’all, tired? C’mon man!
😂👍
This is a really good source for explaining the intentional confusion in regards to the FDA giving out intentionally misleading information on the clot shots. It also reveals the complicit MSM and their conspiracy to push propaganda. Downloaded the full letter for distribution to normies to coat the red pill to make it easier to swallow.
This is exactly what I've read with the release from the FDA this sums it up nicely. Silly wording makes it confusing to most. I saw through tge tricky wording and was telling my coworkers and showing them the tricky wording.
Thanks cats...
Blessings
Bicky this stitch!
Of course it's not! :-(
Soooo therefore it’s NOT approved? Didn’t think so...
Not only is it not approved, but it’s not even being manufactured for distribution. On top of that, pharmacists, businesses, and the general public are all under the FALSE belief that it is fully approved. Each pharmacist I called told me repeatedly that it was the same thing as the current Pfizer vaccination. I said it is definitely not 100% the same. It is almost the same, but the biggest difference of all is that the one that you have been giving is protected from litigation. The one that is FDA approved is not protected from litigation. Besides a few minor unknown, unspecified ingredients that are yet to be identified, the litigation thing is a huge difference!! This card trick that Pfizer & the FDA are playing also gives cover for all of the mandates that rolled out like a steamroller. It’s fraud, and it’s absolutely criminal!!
[Beavis and/or Butthead]
Huhhhuhuhhhuhuhuhhhhuhuhuh
He said Wood Cock
Heehhehhhehehhhehehheh