It also ushered in a 'progressive' government under wraps. People were so concerned with Nam, they simply didn't notice what else was happening.
There was a lot of power gained by the fed govt during that war. It also finalized the economic takeover by the fed/IRS/ADL by removal of the gold standard by Nixon.
Yes. Specifically, I was with HC-7 Det 110, the Big Mothers. Also known as 'Orphans of the Seventh Fleet' since we had no home, and cross decked carrier to carrier for the years Det 110 existed. We were never aboard a given ship more than a month, just moved to another. Three days of four were CSAR; the fourth was other flight duties. Note that besides CSAR, we did medevacs, insertions/extractions, and fire support, especially during Tet 68. Our birds were armored and pretty tough. Those were retired after Tet, and replaced with lesser H-3Ds. Careful about anything written of North SAR; it's not just incomplete, in some cases it's bs.
Thanks. Just help us restore this country.
Thanks. Just help get this country back. That's all any of us wants.
see above make that below
First of all, it's necessary to understand Vietnam. The Nam wasn't some hogwash 'domino' thing about stopping communism: it was a diversion, pure and simple. LBJ NEEDED a diversion to distract from what he was doing in the US - 'the great society' bull that began the real division, destroyed inner cities and started the welfare generations. We were never meant to win Nam; all you need to do is look at where AO was sprayed to see that. It was ALL south of dmz. No competent commander will intentionally go completely defensive - that's not a way to win. You attack the enemy, you don't place strategic targets off limits, and you don't allow the enemy to do whatever he wants. We could have finished that war, as one commander said, in two weeks if we wanted to, simply by dropping on Hanoi and following with the 84 and 101. Remove command, remove the enemy. The tactics we employed did nothing more than piss off the "allied" SVN. There was precious little damage done in the north. Such garbage as bombing targeted rice paddies and jungle. We weren't even allowed to fly over strategic areas such as dumps. Some of us were CSAR (myself included); to go into NVA territory, we were forced to fly a corridor near Vinh; since the NVA knew we would, they had AA installations along that corridor. Also, the military still had the draft; while there were some who were 'patriots' that volunteered because of God and country, there were many more who volunteered to get the service they wanted, under threat of draft. Some were 'he-men' who became Marines, other Marines were weenies that wanted to become men. Not being detrimental to the Jarheads, understand: many of my friends in service were Jarheads, and I'd put my life in their hands before any other service, generally speaking. Anyone who went boots down there became convinced within a month or two that we weren't going to win. It's that simple. Most Nam vets, to address the OP, would readily take up arms for this country - it's OUR country, dammit. There aren't many of us left to do that though, but most of us have a small armory and associated gear. We won't hump 90 lb all day, but I guarantee that whoever encounters one at arms would regret it, at least for a while. The viciousness of Nam jaded all of us, and taking an enemy life wouldn't mean shit. Nor would it matter if we had to remove some of the so-called 'law enforcement' that takes the wrong side. Most of us can still shoot pretty well; some can still go long, thousand yards or more. Some need powerful scopes, but still...
Do we support Trump/Q? Yes, in most cases, without doubt.
Do we know what is happening? Some of us do, those who have followed Q from start, and are willing to do the digs, draw conclusions.
Just keep in mind our numbers are small; last I saw, about 600,000 still live.
We are different from any vet beginning mid-1970s, since they are all volunteer. It has to be noted that the standards began deteriorating dramatically by 1978. Nam vets aren't the same.
I can't, in fairness, compare myself to any modern soldier/sailor; I went through training that was far beyond most, SEALs/SF included. Wont' go into that, save one fact: of over a hundred who volunteered for the HC-7 Big Mother detachment, five completed the courses; the rest were dropped. One was a PO2, and he went to Atsugi; there were three PO3 and one AN, all AX (antisub warfare techs) who had earned wings. Put another way: years after I got out, I encountered a Special Forces guy, SOG in Nam, blaster, many missions. We thought we recognized each other, and eventually he asked if I was a vet. I said yes, I was one of the Big Mothers (we did insertions/extractions also). This Beret backed away - "you f*ckers were crazy." Frankly, I hadn't understood for years what we actually did; I thought our purpose was to 'save lives', and it was, but what it took to do so was a bit over the edge.
I'm running on too much. I'll say one more thing: in the Nam groups I'm in, or was in, anyone who mouthed against Trump went through the wringer, and didn't make more comments.
After some consideration, I think I'll keep quiet on this, being a Nam vet. Therefore, I'm old. And, having been what y'all call 'based' since long ago, well, not exactly that psyop term "boomer", probably my commentary wouldn't go over well.
However, what Trump et al are doing has been a long time coming.
Not to detract from Captain Davis, but there was a saying back then, among us: "There are many acts of heroism in Vietnam. Some even got medals." I witnessed heroism almost every day while flying CSAR, North SAR, USN. Many heroes in a useless war we weren't meant to win.
You are oblivious. This is finished.
Like hell I am. All you need is to look at the history of the US, both economically and otherwise, including the lies. I'm old. I remember things like the Korean War. I fought in Vietnam - not for "my country", which was a sham, but for the others that were there. I have seen - YOU have not. You go on bullshit, pure and simple, using a simplistic attitude and the nonsense from whatever 'schools' you attended. I go on facts, data, records, analysis. That has been my whole life. Yours has been indoctrination. Get over it now, before reality comes and bashes your head in.
Find the original 13th in the National Archives. Ref a mil manual from 1825 that has the entire original constitution as chapter 1. No part of govt was intended to be incorporated. No part of the US economic system was intended as fiat currency. Upon incorporation, the US was no longer a republic. Same thing was done to the Weimar Republic. If your references are from the "modern" history, they're wrong. If your ideology is as what you write, you shouldn't be here.
Where, exactly, did I state W/J/F were alive? The founders were aware of the general plans of the khaz long before 1812, especially Franklin. Don't read what isn't there. It was likely Jefferson who was instrumental in crafting the original 13th amendment, also. (BTW, you might want to recheck your dates.) From that original, ratified in 1811, it's easy to see the teleology of the overall plan of the khaz to control the US. It doesn't take a genius to understand that the War of 1812 happened because of the 13th, since it was deleted during/after the war. Since your understanding is limited, the US was incorporated in 1871, essentially. Lincoln thwarted the split of the US: read the Gettysburg Address. The incorporation effectively dissolved congress/exec and transformed them into the CEO and board of directors, with no holds barred by scotus, since the constitution was invalid, having been replaced. Go ahead and research it. After that, it became simply removal of opposition. Assassinations, sinking ships, crashing planes and so on. Kennedy was simply the removal of opposition.
OK, hotshot. Go with the standards and live in peace. Just don't say you weren't told.
There are different definitions for 'autist'. One is the classical dictionary def. The other comes from the Q drops/anons. That is more colloquial. The "autists" were/are not the classical: they are researchers/analysts with special interests, as in a particular subject.
Let's not confuse the two.
No theories. Go ahead and do your research. Unless you're convinced that modern history junk is true. It's all in the records.
Well. If you lived back then, and had your wits about you, you would know that JFK was a self-proclaimed socialist of the type Rhodes turns out. The happening that changed him was the briefings from Eisenhower, who was under control of the 'cabal' (NOT a patriot - a member of the Khazar mafia that controlled much of the world at the time, including the US). JFK decided, before the Bay of Pigs, that the US shouldn't go the route of Germany post WWI, and tried to stop it. JFK knew the clowns were under direct control of mossad/zionists, and his intent was to remove that enforcement arm. As to the whys, the above is part. Other parts include removal of the Vietnam thing, which was the last straw to the clowns; the JFK declaration of removal of US troops by 1 Jan 1965 was immediately reversed by LBJ upon his swearing. Wars are necessary for the cabal to perform their acts. Until Trump, no president was immune to orders from the cabal, including Reagan.
Get the REAL history before making judgements. Washington/Jefferson/Franklin all knew what the agenda was after 1812, and stated as much.
Q 2225. Landing you saw or see is a movie. Real landings used tech you know nothing of. Stems from way back, and we've had it since 1930s; known before then, to be sure. Fully operational 1938. "P2", Los Alamos.
The JFK assassination was NOT a coup. It was removal of what could have been an obstacle to (((them))). The "coup" occurred in 1871, with beginnings during the War of 1812. FDR finalized it.
You all should by now be aware that the 16th was never ratified. Best research yields only two states that gave it a yes.
The IRS admits it in many court cases. And, the federal reserve is unconstitutional.
More correctly, Khazars. The Khazars have effectively replaced the Hebrew jews to the tune of 97%. All people need to do is revise their thinking, open their minds, and look. It will become obvious, what the agenda is, and always has been. For those who don't believe this: The major world wars were fought where? Europe. Each destroyed milions of white lives. At the same time, there is virtually NO proof of the "holocaust".
Who were the bolsheviks? Their brutal takeover in Russia cost millions, and the subsequent forays against White Russians of all types cost many millions more.
No real - that means REAL - war was ever fought on "israeli" soil. That includes 1967. Why do you suppose the USS Liberty was attacked by israel? Liberty was an electronics intel gathering ship: it could, from radio/radar etc, track troop movements, intercept msgs and on and on. IF Liberty had been allowed to live, the intel would have been available to debunk the entire 6 day "war".
There are literally thousands of direct examples of jew hatred of Whites/Christians. Everyone should recognize that.
To begin with, and caution (as sort of a disclaimer), I don't bother with AI crap on this sort of thing any longer. Reason: there are "powers" that are modifying the speeches, with additions that are NOT in the originals. Find the speeches with subtitles, much better.
Also, if you're truly interested in ironing out the bugs in the narrative, a lot of research is necessary. In a nutshell: Hitler was not the bad guy. He was 'assigned' a project with a major purpose, and he carried it out quite well. That project was to restore a military power gutted by the khazar/jew. The purpose was to stop bolshevik communism from overrunning Europe. The main thrust was Operation Barbarossa.
You're welcome to research this. Please.
"We the people are complicit..." NO, WE ARE NOT. The research does NOT tell the whole truth. You know it, if you've really done the research. In NO case were the people asked. In EVERY case, had we been asked, it would have been "NO". I was NOT asked to go to Vietnam: I had no choice but to either deny my country or go there. NO ONE said we should get involved in Vietnam. That which was used by LBJ to involve us was faked. There were no fast boat attacks on US destroyers. That is a fact borne out by the F-4 film taken on those days. The Marines landed on an empty beach, and all they encountered were farmers working rice paddies. That is one example. We were never meant to win it. Nobody wanted to go to Korea. Think about that "war". We were never meant to win that either. Every other "war" was manufactured from nothing. All of them. The Spanish-American war. WWI. WWII. Korea. Vietnam. All of them. Americans didn't want to go to Europe, in either case.
You have NOT answered WHO WAS TO BLAME for causing those wars. If you don't do that, you've missed the entire point of Q and the rest of those who wish it to stop. That is what I'm saying.
Let's place the blame where it belongs. Please.
It is NOT with us.
You are aware, I assume, that Trump is and has been CiC since his inauguration in 2017. The election of 2018 was to gather results of the fraud; 2020 was the confirmation of fraud throughout the system. bidan was not inaugurated in 2021, he was installed as the figurehead of the defunct corporation, which was declared bankrupt (final judgement) 21 Jan 2021, in FL bankruptcy court. At this point, evidence of election fraud is everywhere, in all states. Note that the too big to rig business is, in a sense, farcical, since much of the fix was stopped by the mil (USMC) and others. The vote was fraudulent, and ample proof is available. In that case, the mil is obliged to nullify, and since Trump is CiC, he can be reinstalled at any time. Regardless, the US has been under military rule since approximately 16 Jan 2021, when it was specifically stated by the LtGen in charge of the NG at that time: "I'm pleased with the peaceful transition to military rule."
Everything past that is part of the movie.
Y'all need to think about it, instead of drawing conclusions about what you know and/or what you think you know. Consider the Q drop: "Moon landings are real." Critical think: What moon landings? "Programs exist that are outside the public domain." Critical: What programs?
Apollo did exist, definitely, with loads of people working it. Dates and other data have been altered, I presume to fit some agenda. One example: Apollo 4, did NOT occur November 1967, it occurred August 1967; it was NOT unmanned, there were two astronauts aboard. I was on that recovery, in the #2 helo, and watched it, along with pickup of the SEALs that did the wet part. #1 picked up the astronauts.
Later on, after the Navy, I worked at a company that did specialty work on aerospace stuff, primarily communications. We produced comm gear that was quite capable of clear communications from the moon. Whoever you are and whatever tech you know, unless you knew exactly how that stuff worked, you would not be able to interpret the signal(s), and that was all classified top. The only tech question is radiation in space. You figure that one out.
Programs: why do you think the 1947 crash was covered up? What programs were being done at Los Alamos in the 1930s, when Werner von Braun was visiting (1936-1938, approximately)?
Russia (USSR), during the 'cold war', did more research into psy stuff than we; the US needed the competition of the 'space race' to complete the economic/political takeover of the US. Look at all that went on end of WWII forward. Without the competition, it would have been much more obvious that the US was being completely taken over. Money was not an object - power was.