"up to 12." yes.
True but this isn't like Vegas at all. This is 90 minutes of video on a dozen cameras tops. It's not days of content from potentially hundreds of cameras.
And calling the police over and over and over again.
I'm just happy that the SRO who allegedly is back on the scene again in the new official report, didn't have keys.
They are digging a deeper and deeper hole. I hope. The truth comes out.
They allegedly have the video now. They say it will take 8 months to review the footage. That is not a joke, that's what they actually say. 8 months to lose it.
CBS says she opened the door twice.
The truck was 15 years old and grandma's, stop it with the truck.
I've got a 200k mile 2004 F-250, you'll give me $70k for it? $20k more than it was slightly used?
The official statement on this is that he entered peacefully and without gun fire after being confronted by an armed SRO.
The unofficial statement is that he shot out the glass after a firefight outside the school.
I don't know why the media and government are lying, but they for sure are.
The story they are putting out makes no sense, correct. That's actually one of the more believable points at this time.
The guns are expensive yes, but the armor part of the story was corrected (no armor) and the truck wasn't his.
Can we please stop with the truck was $70k? It was like 15 years old, and not his.
This describes many sites well: https://youtu.be/q34Qxl5HINg?t=16
This one is already starting to fall out of fashion and the narrative is switching to gun control and how bullying is bad. It is not transitioning (:pepe:) to why a mentally unstable 18 year old whom was "living in poverty" with anger issues was able to purchase and afford at least 2 expensive weapons and lots of ammo. The MSM has not admitted to him being trans yet, but it's coming. They have admitted he was bullied for "wearing eyeliner" and "being in poverty."
It's going to be interesting how they play this one out. I'm just glad he's dead so we don't have to go through a trial, like what happened in Boulder. If you don't remember that memory hole, he killed 10 people because he hated white people. Now he can't stand trial. Disgusting.
Big claims (this) need big evidence.
Interesting, but it's not "salt water": https://www.hotcars.com/this-48volt-quant-gets-600-miles-on-a-tank-of-salt-water/
"bi-ION is a salty aqueous electrolyte solution. It is not plain salt water! The bi-ION electrolyte is made of specially nano-structured molecules, which are the energy carriers and an aqueous solution with dissolved salts to make the electrolyte pumpable."
Admittedly I don't know much about this, but this is something else entirely. Interesting though.
* It seems like this is a derivative of a salt battery. The power is not coming from the water, but what is in it, specifically the catholyte that is producing electricity. This is super interesting, but given how no one has ever heard of it, I'm going to wager there is some limiting factor or cost. Data is sparse on this car/engine.
There it is..... https://qz.com/261450/this-sports-car-runs-on-saltwater-but-its-no-threat-to-tesla/
$1.7 million
and (from the original link)...
The technology however is not perfect, facing several significant challenges including limited power. Therefore small supercapacitors and/or Li-ion batteries are still required for acceleration and regenerative braking which might be why, after 6 years NanoFlowcell has yet to go into production with any of its vehicles.
Project Farm is awesome! Long story short, that's a fuel additive system. It's using the gas to power the system, which makes very little hydrogen. His tests showed it did nothing. Making that system to power the engine and conversion solely is the problem here, and why a "water" engine hasn't been done yet, it's really not possible and a pipe dream of people whom don't understand it.
Then sure 😊
No, water does not combust under earthy reasonable pressure. A pure water engine as science exists now is totally impossible. The only "water" engines I've seen require separation of the molecules. To make it happen efficiently a method of seperating hydrogen from the oxygen without more energy than just powering an electric engine would be required.
Yes. Water is not combustible. For the hydrogen to be combustible in water it needs to be removed from the H2O. To remove it from the H2O it requires a large amount of electricity (or similar). If you've got that much electricity, might as well just power a motor.
For internal combustion engines, largely yes. But they come from distilled petroleum, which is much easier, cheaper, and safer to produce.
This is factually correct. The problem is extracting hydrogen from H2O is very energy intensive, especially through electrolysis. Also raw H2 is very explosive, as is O2, making that progress quite dangerous at even moderate scale. The hydrogen in hydrogen cell vehicles does not come from water.
The water powered car is such a myth. No idea why he was killed but it wasn't because of this.
Archive it or find a better source. Business Insider is terrible, not giving them a click. I have seen this posted on another c here though.
They also just restricted their freedom of movement and travel again. Looks like we're about to see a concurrent illegal border crisis.