Wait...What???
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (73)
sorted by:
The YouTube videos I saw were like 7 years old. I think we need more info before we run with anything close to he was killed for his work on this car. Just putting that out there for the headline readers who don’t research before they run with an idea
AS a person who has dabbled in inventing I can tell you that this makes perfect sense. See when you have an idea you blab it all over the place, but later when you experiment and the idea works you don't post it because the moment you do you get zero money from it. Thus if he stumbled onto something big you wouldn't see it on his YT channel but if he filed an application for a patent the government would know about it and if it was something they didn't want to escape into the wild...
Bottom line, isn't it weird that one of only a handful of people to be strait up murdered was an inventor that in theory could have made a HUGE dent in big oils bottom line and maybe freed the tax slaves from their shackles???
Absolutely!
While I certainly don't condone the government murdering people, I can't remove blame from the inventors seeking to cash in either. It seems if you have something to change the world for the better you should put it out there for free. Notice how the Polio vaccine was never patented? That's because the creator wasn't looking to make money. He wanted to cure people.
If you want to make a difference, expect a reward different than monetary gains and you will be fulfilled.
If inventors put their inventions out for free, then someone else gets to take the invention, file a patent on it; claims ownership, and can still stop the technology from being used by anyone else- because the govt. grants the patent holder legal rights to the property. They can even sue the original inventor for violating "their" patent rights.
Patent laws, and intellectual property rights are used by the establishment to steal from the common man, and elevate their own kind, with stolen property. Notice where Hillary Clinton got her start in federal govt.- the US Patent Office. Kleptocrat heaven.
Hence farmers don't own their seed. Monsanto owns the patent for your food.
Counter move, file for your patent, show proof you filed THEN release it for free. Once it's filed, and you have it on record that it's going through the process, that is your backdate. If no one else has a file for that day then that's that. The product is secure.
Some of us just want a fair compensation for our hard work. Its the government that sets the stage were its freaking impossible without already being rich to do jack shit. I could go on a 10 page rant about how fucked up the patent system is. They pay lip service to the little guy but its all bullshit. You still need tens of thousands of dollars to accomplish anything. If I could patent just 3-4 of my current best ideas I'd be a fucking millionaire. Instead I'm broke as hell. Why? Because I literally can't tell anyone my ideas out of fear they will steal them. The entire system is rigged for big corporations.
And it probibly wasn't the government. If anyone killed this guy it was big business corporate types. If this guy made a better engine for cars big oil would snuff him out in a heartbeat.
I never said that I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a connection. My issue is that people who read headlines(because we all know people like that exist on this site) will start saying with no proof whatsoever that he was killed in a plot to silence his invention. That gives the enemy the ability to factually say we are spreading information with no factual backing and further prolong the awakening and turn people off from the troves of truth on this site. That’s my point of my post. Keep digging and who knows maybe that is the case. But until we have proof presenting this in a way that gets the lazy minded to say oh this shooting is something that it may not be. It’s an obvious hot topic in the media and the last thing we need is for them to say look what this community believes with no proof.
Fair enough. I just read your post(the headline) too quickly. Hehe... :)
Sorry almost died from the irony.
Yeah, thanks for that....Lol
does this story hold water??
Watch the water?
Downvoted cuz im sick of reading that dumb phrase
Lmao
NCSWIC.
Two weeks.
They're scared/panicking.
Suicide Weekend?
Popcorn.
I do believe. Lets talk about your health.
Trumpnthepatriots...
Is reddit down?
I'm not saying these phrases are dumb, was just playfully needling the homie.
Edit: oof, the downdoots...ppl serious today haha.
lol... I think it is a coincidence.
Unfortunately, I can't verify this, but I found it interesting nonetheless...I remember another guy who made an engine that ran off of Water about 10 years ago...he also "died" under suspicious circumstances...
C’mon died? Absolutely murdered. What happens when the people in power’s precious oil and coal are worth nothing due to a car being powered by fookin water. Pretty sure DARPA got ahold of that guy’s designs, etc. and had someone “sent” to “take care of it”.
Oil will never be worthless as many things require it.
This was Stan Meyer who found a way to separate hydrogen from H20 using electrolysis. He wasn't killed for this but for the electrical circuity used to increase the amount of hydrogen extracted from the water.
Have a look at HHO and Browns Gas.
I did clarify why i found this interesting...because it has happened before...That's it...
It's a headline like this.
"Guy dies during his quest to prove that 2+2=5."
100% of people trying to use water as a chemical fuel have either given up or died trying.
We all agree they died. We seem to disagree on why.
The water powered car is such a myth. No idea why he was killed but it wasn't because of this.
There are hydrogen powered vehicles, yes? Hydrogen can be extracted from water, yes? If so, vehicles can run on water.
This is factually correct. The problem is extracting hydrogen from H2O is very energy intensive, especially through electrolysis. Also raw H2 is very explosive, as is O2, making that progress quite dangerous at even moderate scale. The hydrogen in hydrogen cell vehicles does not come from water.
For internal combustion engines, largely yes. But they come from distilled petroleum, which is much easier, cheaper, and safer to produce.
Yes. Water is not combustible. For the hydrogen to be combustible in water it needs to be removed from the H2O. To remove it from the H2O it requires a large amount of electricity (or similar). If you've got that much electricity, might as well just power a motor.
I like this guy…. I watch a ton of his reviews. He reviews one of those hydrogen mpg boosters in this one. I haven’t seen it yet, but I’m watching it now. Maybe it’ll have some interesting info
https://youtu.be/dOiXpCpVofQ
Project Farm is awesome! Long story short, that's a fuel additive system. It's using the gas to power the system, which makes very little hydrogen. His tests showed it did nothing. Making that system to power the engine and conversion solely is the problem here, and why a "water" engine hasn't been done yet, it's really not possible and a pipe dream of people whom don't understand it.
🤝. This is an interesting video. https://youtu.be/wxfo-w0ptEo
https://inhabitat.com/the-worlds-first-saltwater-powered-electric-car-is-now-street-legal-in-germany/
Slightly off since it's salt water, but I thought it would be funny to link nonetheless
Interesting, but it's not "salt water": https://www.hotcars.com/this-48volt-quant-gets-600-miles-on-a-tank-of-salt-water/
Admittedly I don't know much about this, but this is something else entirely. Interesting though.
* It seems like this is a derivative of a salt battery. The power is not coming from the water, but what is in it, specifically the catholyte that is producing electricity. This is super interesting, but given how no one has ever heard of it, I'm going to wager there is some limiting factor or cost. Data is sparse on this car/engine.
There it is..... https://qz.com/261450/this-sports-car-runs-on-saltwater-but-its-no-threat-to-tesla/
and (from the original link)...
I met an old man about 25 years ago that was a retired NASA engineer. He had a push mower that ran off water. It needed battery power to seperate the hydrogen from the oxygen and a little shot of gas to get it started.
This reminds me of the perpetual motion machine demos.
Really? Next do the atomic bomb
In other news, I've developed a fireplace that runs on ashes! Imagine, no more burning wood for heat! Just lighting the ashes over and over! I hope they don't kill me too to prevent this secret getting out!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SAFQdYYXyls
Only in America would you have someone test this idea on a giant 4x4 😂 fair play to him though!
Nah. Hho separation still uses more energy then it produces. (Even using piezo and vibrations)
Gas needs to be at $12-14/gal before it's worth it...but then the kwh costs will be higher then too...
Regardless of whether it uses more energy than it produces, it does still seem like it can improve efficiency in a vehicle that also uses gas. So not 100% hho, but hho + gas.
From my understanding gas burns relatively slowly while hydrogen burns super fast. By injecting a small amount of hho you can get a more complete burn on the fuel you do inject, so you should be able to reduce the amount of incoming gas while outputting the same amount of power.
However install one of these cells on a modern car and there's a good chance you won't see any benefit, this is why so many people say the tech doesn't work. If you have a fully programmable ecu you can adjust fuel trim values while monitoring egts and tune the system.
I'm actively working on a system and in a month or two hope to make a post on it with my findings. I have equipment and the knowledge/means to experiment with it so I hope to put this to rest once and for all as to whether it works or not, and how effective it is.
I am well familiar with the technology and have a device I am working on.(on and off 8 years, mostly off these past 3 yrs.)
Yes, hydrogen burns hotter and will ignite some more of the gas that would not otherwise get ignited. (Waste of gas is incredible even in most new cars)
and yes, each car would need a tunable EFI in line so they don't run rich/lean as the HHO is injected into the air intake.(assuming that is the easiest method for a booster mod.)
My point is that they would not care to kill him over it. He is small peanuts.
*Unless of course he stumbled on the holy grail and could replace Gas entirely or used frequency at minuscule energy cost which is far from what I saw in his videos.
I'd love to see your design.
You're probably right, not much point in taking the risk to kill him over it unless he ran across something extra crazy. My thought is he either died a normal death or was killed off for some other reason.
I'm glad to hear you're working on a device too! The more people the better! I'll definitely share more info on mine once I test it.
As for making sure the engine doesn't run rich/lean, isn't the idea to let it run slightly lean when the system is in effect? I may be incorrect but I believe I read that increasing the efficiency of the burn by injecting HHO can reduce overall cylinder temperature thus allowing you to lean it out more with less threat of detonation/damage. I have an EGT sensor (installed this last weekend), so I'm basically planning on getting a base reading on the EGTs, add the HHO then see if I get a drop in the EGTs. If I do, I was going to then re-tune and lean it out as much as possible while keeping an eye on the EGTs to ensure they don't rise above that base reading. While of course also monitoring for a loss in power.
I will be injecting the HHO through the intake as you said, basically on the main intake tube right before the throttle body. Also rather than a tuneable EFI inline (would be ideal for most vehicles), I actually have a complete custom ECU (megasquirt).
One more note that's somewhat unrelated. Prior to putting this HHO cell on my car I was experimenting with using it to run (well attempt to run) a small single cylinder engine, like one off an old edger. Primary issue was it was set up for wasted spark and the timing is slightly off for pure HHO so when I inject the gas (no normal gasoline, only HHO), it basically kicks back instantly and shoots a flame out the side. I haven't had time to completely redesign a timing system for it, but with the force of the kickback it makes me think that if the timing were correct it'd actually run, and that's solely off just hydrogen.
For due diligence sake, let's call this out.
The narrative has always been "it takes too much energy to extract the H2 from H2o therefore don't bother trying it"
What if that is a lie like everything else? It could be legit, but obviously we have people being murdered when they get over the same target - so should be worth a look.
That's a fair comment. I wasn't calling you out. You can't argue with math formulas.
I just suspect in this case that somewhere the narrative is discouraging people who are much smarter than myself to actually putting their hands to the plow to find the solution...
I think this is really more smoke and mirrors more than it being an assassination.
Its the narrative "they were good boos. Doctors who would change the world if only white supremacy and racism hadn't cut them down"
He was a former cop? Trying to paint him as a hero. He was inventing a water engine? A genius who would save the world.
No, he wasnt assassinated for this. He never even existed.
Folks this is what happens to ANYONE who can create a process we’re autos can run on “water” or other non fossil fuels. At least forty years ago another inventor died mysteriously making the fuel water. He had an article in Look or life magazine. If you have an invention that works keep it secret and release the plans on the internet for free.
looked into this already, comment i made when it popped up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d89SQ_tZexg&ab_channel=GlobalNews
found this in comments looking for his channel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a74uarqap2E&ab_channel=Mokdo68
I can't find the guys actual youtube channel, im gonna assume it doesnt exist? he's apparently just using the kit linked above to power his car.
It's already been done. The last guy, Californian, was killed can't remember his name. He had it working.
This invention would have destroyed the US Dollar since it is backed by petroleum. The DS financial control and Federal Reserve would be permanently broken and abolished. It would force the Rothschilds to relinquish their hold on our gold supply.
I heard something like this years, years, ago. I never knew if it was true or not, just didn't care because I was much younger. I do remember when my father would say they could make these cars that wouldn't be susceptible to rust like they used to be---he would always say they rust so that we can't keep them forever😊
Very descriptive title.
This was done in 1974...
https://youtu.be/7u10UybuCxk
Huh, imagine that.