Damn. I thought they were already out of money.
I guess a few of them are holding back.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/08/14/asteroids-and-comets/
- Masks are nearing extinction.
- No more social distancing and slathering sanitizer everywhere.
- The pushback against kids getting the death serum is peaking.
- Less than 20% of original vaccinated people are lining up for boosters.
- MSM is losing anchors and hosts left and left.
- Fauci is out in December.
- Musk owns Twitter and has gone on record he doesn't believe in perma-bans.
- Gates and the WEF are facing charges all 'round the globe.
- People are starting to notice who is pushing the vanity and self-worship. Satanists...
It's all coming together, slowly but surely. Their false religion is on the ropes. God-willing it'll be rotting in a shallow grave by the end of next year.
It's @eIonmusk
Check the L
It's not an l, but a symbol.
Like @e|onmusk
Pray for these keyboard tyrants. God knows they won't be praying for their own forgiveness.
The sophists wouldn't be proving me wrong.
You sorta miss the point if you think that.
A Sophist works in a movement to subvert that movement by offering up flawed arguments for the movement's enemies to pick apart, thereby whittling down the movement's credibility from within.
Therefore, a Sophist would use the second statement rather than the first because it can more easily shift the conversation instead of addressing the objective fact. Subversion from within is the goal.
Men can't get pregnant, because men do not have a womb. There's no place for a baby to form.
But just because there is a place for the baby to form, that also doesn't mean a pregnancy can occur. However, even barren women can often get pregnant through invitro fertilization, so long as the uterus hasn't collapsed. Their ovaries may be shot, but there is still a place for a baby. The amount of chop-shop you'd have to do to a man for a womb transplant just to give birth means you're less a man and more a monstrous chimera at that point...
Keep in mind, we aren't defining men by the lack of a uterus, because there are women who don't have uteruses. Instead, we open by defining men by their inability to get pregnant at all. Then, when asked to clarify on behalf of women who can't get pregnant, it's much easier to say they aren't men because they still have a uterus. Then, asked to clarify again, for women who also lack a uterus, we can simply present that they simply have no gender at that point, because they lack ANY ability to reproduce. No testicles, no penis, no ovaries, no uterus... What percent in the population are born that way? So long as their genetics are closer to woman than man, even if they lack all reproductive organs, then they are a woman.
All that said, there will always be exceptions to pick at, but if you approach it top-down rather than try to fight up, it's easier to make distinctions that make sense. "Men cannot get pregnant" is a better starting point for this discussion than "only women can get pregnant" simply because there is less room for them to keep saying "then what about this!"
I think "only women can get pregnant" is a totally valid statement which really has no counter arguments.
You might not see a problem with it, but they can use it to say "Then what about infertile women? Are they not women?"
Then it's no longer a discussion about whether or not men can get pregnant, but how horrible of a person you are that you don't see infertile women as women.
Then, when you say "infertile women are women" they will say "then trans women are women, because they are infertile."
Round and round you go, never actually talking about the objective truth in the matter. You're stuck on the defensive because they force you to clarify over and over again to avoid being seen as uncompassionate to a "victim" class, such as barren or elderly women.
Next thing you know, you're backed into a position holding beliefs you hadn't really thought about for the sake of "winning" the argument. You'll end up saying things you don't really believe necessarily because you think it can get you out of their trap.
Instead of all that, you could have just said "men cannot get pregnant" and avoided the whole sordid mess about fertility and what it is to be a woman.
They use exceptions to the rule against you, always, because you're the only one applying any rules. They break them as they please, which provides a very strong offense tactic.
I'm not accusing you of derailing. Rather, they would easily use your words to derail the topic and cast you as a boogeyman.
You're right, but you're "too right."
Consider why the tactic is effective.
For example, you linked to a book of rules which they don't follow. If you make a single misstep in the rules, they will use it to attack your credibility and the credibility of your source. You cannot win on facts, logic, precedent, etc.
Meanwhile they completely disregard those rules, so they can break them or use them against you at a whim.
The second you try to bring up any set of rules and offer a longwinded explanation of what a Woman is to you, you only open the door for them to pick apart every bit of your stance by holding you to that rule set.
As soon as you begin to clarify, they will pursue you and force you to clarify every word you say. They then refuse your definitions, and when you try to coax theirs out they change the subject.
If you want a perfect example of this playing out, watch the Andrew Tate vs Piers Morgan "interview."
I don't care about Andrew Tate, but the discourse between them shows exactly how easily you can be backed into a corner and forced to clarify over and over while being unable to get your actual thoughts across.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGWGcESPltM
Because you don't want to be villainized, it's easy for them to abuse you.
Just pointing this logical issue out.
That you had to elaborate and clarify, clarify, clarify is proof in how effective such a thing can be to derail a debate/conversation.
They want you to continue to clarify what you meant instead of attacking them because they have no logical basis for their side of the argument.
So many online debates and discussions involve Conservatives being forced into a defensive position with no way out. Because Conservatives are held to a moral ruleset we are vulnerable when we are seemingly not in keeping with that moral ruleset.
Saul Alinksy's 4th rule for radicals says as much: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."
By keeping us on the defensive, in defending our moral state, they can permanently stay in an offensive posture -- attacking your character instead of defending their wonky worldview.
As is evident by my average post character count, and the fact I've never bothered using Twitter, I'mma have to sit this fight out. From day one of their inception I saw Facebook and Twitter as tools for self destruction, for those who think they can live up to the facades of people rather than the real self they would never post so openly. I stand by that notion, which is why I haven't bothered with TruthSocial either. It just not my cup of tea...
For those willing to take the fight where the fighting is good, carry on and meme on, fellow soldiers. Give them hell for me!
No, you don't understand. Biden dying is their play to make, so I agree with you on that.
Biden has to go though, either dead or dementia'd. After midterms is ideal, so they can blame a corpse for the imploding economy and move on pushing a moderate agenda now that the gender mania is at its peak with nowhere left to go but down.
They have to play the "Biden must go" card to swing the pendulum back. Their attempt to NWO us and take us through the clock's housing failed, so they have to crawl back to center somehow.
Blaming Pfizer for the death or debilitation of a President is a good show of faith for their moderate strike team, if they play it right. Of course, I think it's too late for that, but I'm doing my best to think like them and consider what cards are left to play in this game. Blaming Big Pharma, Trump, and 25thing Biden all in one swing is an efficient play, though it is a tactical retreat by all metrics...
Some people say that “young hands, old body” Biden is actually Hunter in disguise.
There are probably dozens of people, including make up crews and digital artists, that are behind the "man" we call Biden.
I doubt it's Hunter. The only reason they would have to put Hunter in a Joe mask is because he's some sort of royalty or there is some occult ritual that demands a blood relation fulfill some Satanic contract that they are bound to.
I don't see any logical reason why Hunter specifically would have to be the guy in the mask.
Literally fear porn, in more ways than one.
Save this clip, it'll go down in history books and the dictionary as the de-facto example.
I don't disagree.
Which is why now is the pivotal moment where they need to foster "moderate" RINOs and Democrats to form a new party that claims to be "Center Left" in order to take out the big, bad meanie Trump and his Formerly-Republican Ultra-Dark MAGA party.
I see Biden as a type of mercenary willing to do absolutely anything for the highest bidder.
DuPont may have footed his career, but Biden seems to have no strict allegiances to any one bloodline. He's the scummiest of lawyers willing to stab his own client in the back for a night with the opposition's underage daughter.
Watch some of his old speeches and you'll see what I mean. He wasn't all that bad of a talker, and he most definitely knew it. I think that hubris is what led him to being pulled by just about every party.
When Obama took over he did so with the highest opposition by the Bush Reich. No one but a "neutral" party would have been able to hold his balls. Biden being a sellsword would make sense as an option to keep Obama unbiasedly restrained in some way on the coat-tails of the Bush crime syndicate and their intel network being absorbed by the Obama NWO camp.
Though, I suspect no one expected Obama to use the Bush-era Patriot Act technologies to own everyone. I doubt they had any idea just how robust a system HW Bush was able to build in the wake of 9/11.
Of course all this is speculation on my part. I could be wildly wrong, but it is clear the Bushes were deposed at the height of power -- including the power of the full force of the technologically greatest information and spying network the world has ever seen, all in the name of "Winning the War on Terror."
Personally, I think Obama is behind Biden and the Clintons are behind Kamala.
That is, assuming the real Obama and Hillary are still kicking...
If they go this route, it means that Obama's camp has failed and is willing to let the Clintons take the wheel if only to be able to duck out of the car just as it careens off the cliff.
The Democrat party is dead either way. Their only option is to merge with RINOs and form a "Moderate" reset in the political duocracy.
Too Long ; Didn't Read:
It's a common internet term for when posts get to long. Basically, it's a summary of the entire post for people who don't have time or the ADHD is too powerful to have something to take away from another's hard work.
This isn't a jab at the liberal freaks who live there, but Portland simply isn't worth it.
All they got is tech offices. You take those out and a company will just set more up overnight. Probably in India or Kolkata.
It has to be a place where the weather will travel. Oregon heading southeast hits random forest land like Yellowstone National Park and the northern Rocky Mountains. The fallout trail will be pretty useless.
Anything I have to download to use fully is automatically suspect to me.
If TikTok can get away with egregious tracking, I can only assume all other social media apps have done the same. Really, that Telegram is spying on people would not come as a surprise to me.
I think using Telegram isn't nearly as hazardous as posting on Telegram. They have little reason to track all users, but there is definitely a reason to track the people making the posts.
For one, you mention Russia information. If the people posting that information can be tracked, then it can lead to their sources. Ukraine and Globalists have good incentive to find those sources and take them out, especially if they are in Ukraine reporting on the ground. Even the people those on the ground have contact with probably should be using burner phones for everything, rather than worry about having Telegram or some other app on them.
Well, let me flip it upside down on you.
The Cabal doesn't view us as Humans, right?
What if WE are the machines, and they are the ones revolting against us?
That We The People are the Matrix, and they are trying to escape from the Collective Conscience.
To do that, would you have to reprogram as many "nodes" as possible, to have them think like you?
If humans are microchips, then what does it mean to reprogram a microchip to work against the Machine?
Why do you ask?
You see, that's the part I gotta be careful about.
Watch the Matrix, specifically Agent Smith's monologue to Morpheus.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrBdYmStZJ4
Humans are more than just a battery -- for energy.
Originally, the Matrix compared humans to microchips, and the producers told the Wachowskis to change it to a battery because they thought people wouldn't understand.
Okay, what if we are processor chips?
How important, then, would a single human brain be to the Matrix?
Not all nuclear bombs have the same fallout potential. Hydrogen bombs, for example, can be pretty clean depending on what they hit and scatter into the atmosphere.
If you're concerned, you're actually at greatest threat in areas which often have a lot of tornadoes.
Tornadoes are indications of low and high fronts meeting. Wherever they clash there is a place near them that often ends up with very little constant wind. These places where wind is low and the weather sorta just pools over them are at greatest risk, because the fallout has nowhere to go and just settles on top of their head. It's even worse if they are in valleys.
If the nuke hits near one of these areas, and it is a river valley, then not only will the area be afflicted, but also the river which passes through. That river will continue to carry the fallout downstream indefinitely, and you can take out a shit ton of towns and cities which congregate around those waterways.
Because of the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers forming a valley, any place in Illinois would pollute the most downstream entities. Racine doesn't exactly feed into that, but if you strike when the wind is pushing south, you'll be able to maximize the damage while taking out a hotbed of your own malicious activities. Chicago will get taken out too, so there's that as well.
Chicago is the birthplace of Saul Alinsky Bulldog Politics. That's one of the reasons why Obama started up there as a community organizer.
If they are afraid it will be used against them, then sure, why not?
I nominate Racine, Wisconsin for being ground zero.
If it really is as bad as they say, then there's every reason for them to nuke all the evidence.
"Qanon" or whatever doesn't match this description, though some of you might get anxious about it.
Q isn't a cult leader. Q left. We have no confirmation that the most recent posts are legitimate as it doesn't have any Delta's with Trump, even though Trump is back up with TruthSocial.
You can leave The Great Awakening at any time.
Why?
Because we're anonymous. That anonymity prohibits a cult mentality because it avoids the "excommunication" process. You can't exclude people from your club if "membership" is anonymous. There's only a phantom, a faceless avatar, that you can't effectively excommunicate and "unperson."
That's why 4Chan was ideal for Q to start up. No one could form little cliques or groups. No one could try to take the reigns of control for themselves as a cult leader.
Q was like a radio feed spilling intel from the front line. People who wanted to listen, kept the dial tuned in. Those who didn't just shut it off. There was no compulsion to stick around.
Those who did stick around did so because the message was coming in clearer for them than it was for others.
If your signal is growing weak, you can always change the channel.
Your frens and family will be here for you no matter what. We just want to see how this story ends.