1
sleepydude 1 point ago +5 / -4

Define "White Lie"

Did Jesus lie when he spoke parables?

Did those events really happen? He frequently said with assertion "there once was" not "here's a story."

Did Jesus lie?

Parables are spells, using the traditional definition of the word.

Again, it would appear you're under a spell which causes you to only see the word in a singular, unmoving way. There's a deeper meaning to the word, and its association to what we in modern times call "magic" is an illusion, a spell of its own, meant to deceive us and keep us superstitious and therefore "safe" from the Truth.

Spells are psyops. They are narratives. They are stories. They are dogma.

All these words try to describe the same ideal -- that you can tell a fictitious story in order to impart a moral truth. However, the moral truth you plant can be corrupt, and therefore harm the person whose mind you've inserted your story.

There are bad morals to bad stories. Woke ideology demonstrates that.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
sleepydude 1 point ago +5 / -4

Fiction is no different than a tale, a story, a narrative, a spell, and a lie.

They all function the same.

Fictional stories can have virtue. They can tell a moral truth, encapsulated in a story so that people can more readily adhere to much more complex solutions to life's everyday problems.

It's like a computer file that's been compressed such that it is more easily readable by our brains.

When your brain no longer knows what the original file was, but still is able to read the compressed file, it is no different than being under a spell. You do the thing because that's how you do the thing.

Jesus cast spells on people. He told tales and stories. We call them parables. They held within them moral truths. He did this because he is the Good Shepherd. Unlike the Pharisees who ruled by dogma alone, demanding their rules be followed and not questioned, Jesus encouraged us to question his narratives, his parables, his spells.

I suspect you have additional connotations with the word "spell." I'm using the Mark Twain era "let me tell you a spell" rather than strictly the modern interpretation of witchcraft and demonism.

That's what I'm trying to express here in this post. The Cabal has corrupted the original word in order to suit their goals. Originally, the term spell was in reference to stories by which a moral truth is concentrated -- most commonly told to children so that they might adhere to logical conclusions, and stay safe, before they are able to fully comprehend the moral truth.

You tell a kid that a monster lives in the woods and they will die if they wander off. This is a spell, a lie, like Santa Claus, which deludes them into following your rules with consequences they can understand. "Be nice and you get presents, be mean and you get coal."

We cast spells on our kids all the time. What's denigrating is when the Elites treat us as children and say "take the jab and you won't get sick." It's no different than how a pedophile grooms a child and lies to them to "keep this our little secret or your parents will get mad at you and won't let us play together anymore."

There are good spells and bad spells. Fictitious works are exactly that. They have their uses, despite the delusion they inflict on the unaware minds of our world.

1
sleepydude 1 point ago +5 / -4

Would you consider all works of fiction to be bad?

The case can absolutely be made that fictitious stories delude humanity. What would a world without fiction look like? Why do we entertain ourselves with fictitious stories? What is the purpose of a fictitious work?

Remember: "1. A story; a tale."

8
sleepydude 8 points ago +11 / -3

Don't be so hasty to assume as much.

Do you believe any stories or narratives you personally cannot validate?

Those are spells as well.

Things like believing you have to wear clothes. Why do we have to wear clothes? That's a spell, and one that Genesis addresses.

Not all spells are bad, mind you. Not all are pure scams. Some are just done to make things easier. The majority of spells are simply placed on the minds of the "sheep" so that they don't jump off a cliff, which is still in the sheep's best interest.

People will have spent ages figuring out the best way to do a thing, and instead of having to teach people every step of the process of how we got from stones and sticks to jackhammers, you just tell someone "this is the tool for the job" and they will use the tool you provide. Unfortunately, that also causes them to never wonder if there's a tool other than a jackhammer which may be more efficient.

We are locked in the "that's how you do this" mentality all over the place.

How do you get food? Well, you gotta get a job. To get a well-paying job you need a degree. To get a degree you gotta get good grades. Etc.

Each of those dogmatic beliefs is a spell that we all lazily adhere to because it's easy, not because it's right or wrong, and not because it's the most optimized.

It's just the easiest path with the least amount of thinking required to do the thing we want to do.

The first step to breaking a spell on you is recognizing it as a spell. With every task you should ask "why do I do things this way"? If you cannot provide a well-thought and reasoned explanation for why you perform the task as such, then you are under a spell -- a subconscious adherence to dogmatic tradition based not on your own reasoned process but due to the rules which have been established.

https://qalerts.app/?n=4535

"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.

Besides, if you still pay income taxes, whether or not you recognize you're under a spell, you at the very least are adhering to it. Though I do advise not playing tango with the IRS. Breaking a spell has consequences, as all those still under the spell will act as crabs in a barrel and pull you right back in. You will be punished, and such is the cost of freedom.

You may disagree with the majority, but if you still do as they do you're still effectively under the spell regardless of you recognizing it.

1
sleepydude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sometimes the AI pulls out some winners:

https://inspirobot.me/

3
sleepydude 3 points ago +3 / -0

Animals don't eat much if any carbohydrates.

Cut the bread, cut the plant fats and oils, and double down on protein and you'll be shocked just how buff you'll begin to appear.

I will also note, however, that most animals in the wild don't live very long. The pictures you see of lions, tigers, and bears are typically in their equivalent "teen" years. You see the muscles because their skin is still supple.

2
sleepydude 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Malone is just tired of gaining no headway in the "vaccine" debacle, and how no one has yet been taken to account for their genocidal actions.

I'm sure we're all about with him on that.

Malone, not incorrectly, believes that by poking Trump he might be able to get him to open the flood gates. Trump has had many opportunities to do so, so it's clear that's not gonna happen.

So, my summation is that Malone is just wanting less happenings and more results. Again, I'm sure we're all right there with him on that. He's just willing to throw Trump under the bus or at the very least derail Trump from his stubborn trajectory just to get things going.

5
sleepydude 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you’re an American Patriot who loves our Country, but knows that the 2020 Presidential Election was Rigged & Stollen, or even question what went on during this very traumatic and demoralizing period in USA HISTORY, YOU MUST IMMEDIATELY BUY A FANTASTIC BOOK ON THE ELECTION, AND WHAT WE MUST DO TO WIN IN 2024. It is entitled “STEALING YOUR VOTE, THE INSIDE STORY OF THE 2020 ELECTION AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR 2024.” Written by brilliant Christina Bobb, as introduced by STEVE BANNON, it is GREAT!

1
sleepydude 1 point ago +1 / -0

They may be able to use them, but can they come up with metaphors organically?

They can regurgitate ones they've heard, but can they produce one given a prompt?

Give me an analogy describing how hand-outs can lead to dependency.

I would expect the analogy it could come up with would be the bog-standard "don't feed the bears" analogy.

Could they develop one OTHER than that? Doesn't that require a fundamental understanding of they dynamics, not just an animalistic sentience?

4
sleepydude 4 points ago +4 / -0

Same. I believe that the White Hats are trying desperately to break the cycle. No currently living person has been out of the cycle, so no one realistically believes it is possible. No one knows what it even looks like, because our deluded ancestors have spent every expense to expunge that time from our history -- leaving a history where they've always been in charge and always will be should they have their way.

That's what Jesus brought us: proof that there is another way, the True way, which is not the way of Man but the way of the Father.

Burning books from the previous generation only ensures we not learn our lessons from the previous generation. We have book-burners in charge right now, on both sides. Doing so only serves to expunge those paths which do not lead to paradise.

The problem we face is that people are not allowed the wrong-think. Both sides are guilty of pushing this unrealistic constraint on us that we must not ever be allowed to fail. Failure is part of life. Expunging proof of one's failures, too, only provides for our progeny to repeat history, having no record of what paths fail and why.

In other words, we haven't been allowed to fuck around and find out. Freedom to succeed also entails freedom to fail.

White Hats, for The Plan™ to work, must allow us to fail. It is necessary. That's why I'm prepared for a financial collapse. Scorched earth...

I remember before my grandmother died she told me a story about how they checked whether or not eggs were rotten or not. If you put them in water, and some float and some sink, you'll know which are rotten. I suspect that bit of advice, in light of the current price of eggs, will soon be invaluable.

4
sleepydude 4 points ago +4 / -0
  • that people would long for the days when we were morally inclined to do good and would work together to achieve a better world and rid ourselves of this leftist baggage.

That's why the Cabal is pushing the trans and drag stuff so far. They create a boogeyman, kill the boogeyman, and then get everyone to hold them up as heroes. It's all just controlled opposition, artificially putting them in seats of power.

They know people are begging for a return to sanity, which is why they always have a contingent of RINOs seated and on stand-by to take the reigns once the other side is done raising up stink people will desperately sell their souls to be rid of.

The pining for a return to a moral, nuclear family can absolutely be used against us. Just like with their Central Banking Digital Currency scheme. Destroy the financial sector, blame it on liberal spending, then offer the solution by way of a One-World-Currency to relieve all the stress and fear people now have after waking up and being told their bank can't afford to give them their paycheck.

It's the time tested bait-and-switch.

Again, so long as Tyranny is the end result, they don't care what color flag they wave.

7
sleepydude 7 points ago +7 / -0

This swing back, however, is attempting to break the clock's housing.

They want to take us back with such restrictive conservative values that it becomes a Spanish Inquisition state.

I know it's hard to accept considering we're fighting literal child fuckers, but censorship is wrong regardless of who is pulling the levers. We are very close to conservative straight-edges banning anime because a few artists are drawing 1000 year old loli's in compromising positions.

Okay, sure, that's degenerate, but if you ban it don't you see what you're allowing to happen next?

It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree with that content, the fact is that once you ban it you open the bureaucratic door to pinch little bits at a time at what is considered "safe" art. After they go after anime/manga, they will turn their eyes to all independent artists. Eventually, memes will fall under the umbrella of the same auspice. Finally, we won't so much as be able to post hand-drawn figures online without the same Karens calling it pedophilic, satanic, or some such other "ic."

It's all just more of the same. People claiming the moral high ground and beating you down. Bullies in positions of authority...

Music will be restricted to no longer allow cursing or "problematic" themes. Shows would all be required to pass "royal road" checks to be aired. YouTube would be reduced to nothing more than a modern-day America's Funniest Home Videos...

And that's just the start.

All it really is is nothing more than a choke hold on fun. Depressed and spiteful creatures willing to toss your game console out the window because you aren't paying attention to them. They'll bitch and moan about what you're doing, but in reality it's not what you're doing nor the moral values it represents, but the simple fact that they aren't being worshipped and praised.

Hyper-conservatives did this when they pushed against rock-and-roll.

Hyper-liberal bitches did this during segregation with their "separate but equal" mantras.

Hyper-conservatives did this even during the 90's and the various edgy toys and games that came about like Mortal Kombat.

Hyper-liberal woke are doing it now, inserting politics and demanding the gaming industry, for example, bend to their interests despite them never playing anything more intense than angry-birds or candy crush.

We have to be very careful not to hand the keys to fun from one overbearing Karen with blue hair to another overbearing Karen with red hair. Both hate memes, which should tell you everything you need to know about them. Red or blue paint, they'll still suck the fun out of your life because they can't stand other people having fun while they sulk and scheme like the Grinch.

Probably more of a rant than you'd have expected...

2
sleepydude 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wouldn't work. Never does.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Samuel%208&version=NIV

10 Samuel told all the words of the Lord to the people who were asking him for a king. 11 He said, “This is what the king who will reign over you will claim as his rights: He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and horses, and they will run in front of his chariots. 12 Some he will assign to be commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and others to plow his ground and reap his harvest, and still others to make weapons of war and equipment for his chariots. 13 He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers. 14 He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive groves and give them to his attendants. 15 He will take a tenth of your grain and of your vintage and give it to his officials and attendants. 16 Your male and female servants and the best of your cattle[c] and donkeys he will take for his own use. 17 He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become his slaves. 18 When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, but the Lord will not answer you in that day.”

19
sleepydude 19 points ago +19 / -0

I'd say it's comms.

Pendulum shift.

They pulled this same crap between WW1 and WW2.

Weimar as a means to an end. Fasco-dictatorship. Hitler couldn't have risen to power if Weimar didn't precede him. The same club controls both sides, they just grant power to one or the other to "maintain balance."

They do, in fact, want to have us rush head-long into extreme conservatism, so long as it stays authoritarian. Then, a couple decades down the line, the same voices on the left today will tell us "we told you so, we need to 'return' to the liberal ideology."

They are slowly teeter-tottering us up the Tower of Babel -- bouncing between radical conservatism and radical liberalism. Two sides of the same coin, which plants itself delicately in the coffer of Tyranny.

It's just a game to them, and at the start they pick the red team or the blue team. What they proselitize doesn't matter to them, so long as the end result is control and power over the [feeders.]

https://qalerts.app/?q=feeder

https://qalerts.app/?n=184

u/#q184

5
sleepydude 5 points ago +5 / -0

Doesn't need to be explosives. Just a shot of fentanyl to the nostrils and you're done-zo. That way they don't have to sacrifice the drones.

20
sleepydude 20 points ago +20 / -0

I say let them.

Trump set up a landmine and is waving them on to greet him.

It'd be a shame not to see it go off and take their legs and ass cheeks out.

Bring on the fireworks, I say!

2
sleepydude 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes and no. At least then they could die in blissful ignorance. Some people are happy not knowing what's actually going on in the world, but when push comes to shove we all eventually ask for the truth out of curiosity.

3
sleepydude 3 points ago +3 / -0

The average person 2 generations ago was unfathomably based compared to us.

They may have been based, but they had no clue just how deep the corruption ran. I'm not saying the internet is all good, but it's not all bad either. The more luxuries they allow themselves, the more luxuries we, too, can get ahold of. Their biggest mistake in all this is letting the slaves use the tools of the masters -- in a bid to make more whips, they taught the slaves to make whips. Now we have the whips, they are panicking to put the genie back in the bottle.

The Great Reset is a reset back to before the internet -- back to before they lost control of the levers of power.

Again, our ancestors may have been more based, but they were also more gullible.

2
sleepydude 2 points ago +2 / -0
  1. The people who are broadcasting on stations like CNN and MSNBC, etc. need to be FINALLY told that if they agree to spread propaganda that they are going to be arrested for sedition if they continue to report false news. 2. The Congress MUST pass a bill making it illegal for these outlets to propagate their opinions while claiming to be news reporters.

That's exactly what we have now in many countries, though.

It's backwards. WHO determines what is propaganda and what isn't? WHO determines what is true and what is false?

That's the problem. Our Media IS controlled by the government. We aren't at the point of arrests yet, but that's what they're trying for.

FREE PRESS is what the Founding Fathers touted. The Corporate-Hedonism we are dealing with right now is the loophole that they've spent centuries to arrive at to dance around the First Amendment. The Founding Fathers set up the Second Amendment to resolve the exact issues we face now. They, too, found loopholes around that, with their crown jewel being the Patriot Act which gives them power to call anyone a "domestic terrorist" should they resort to the bullet box to protect the First Amendment.

As far as the phones go, you can't get rid of them. They are here to stay. If we ban them in the US, other countries will use them and take us to the rinser economically. Same thing goes for android workmen. As soon as they can get a bot in the place of a man, it doesn't matter if you ban it so long as a place like China, whose moral compass is all fucked up, is willing to double down to become the Number 1 power in the world.

The only option is to never let these inventions out to begin with. Problem there, however, is that's exactly what the Khazarian Mafia has done all along. Their first and last battlefield is the patent office. Always has been. They kill you, steal your invention, steal your legacy, and shove it out as their own or sit on it among a hoard of other suppressed inventions until they see it worthy to release upon the world for their own luxury.

That's what the Eye of Providence upon the Pyramid symbolizes. A hoard of "bricks" which are inventions upon which Civilization rests as a foundation set aside and overseen by the All-Seeing eye which "provides" should you be a good little slave.

Again, it's impossible at this point to see what the future will hold, simply because we are castrated technologically by these patent thieves. Med beds could very well be the least of the revolutionary inventions they've been sitting on like Fafnir upon his hoard of gold.

5
sleepydude 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe it's hopelessness, or may it's as you say, no time. Without time to reflect life becomes drained of meaning.

You can't pine for and miss what you never had. I'm only hopeless because I recognize what I'm missing out on. I'm still indifferent, as you say, just like the rest of my generation. What point is there in giving your all when you'll never get paid fairly for your efforts?

The term is "Crestfallen."

https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Crest-fallen

  1. Dejected; sunk; bowed; dispirited; heartless; spiritless. 2. Having the upper part of the neck hanging on one side, as a horse.

It's not just depression. It's the depression of a beast of burden well past broken in -- just waiting patiently for death to take them. It's not just an indifference towards others, it's an indifference towards life. A pure demoralization which no self-help book will get you out of, because it's not a conflict with God you have, but a conflict with the World of Man in which you feel you've never belonged.

That's how I feel... Like I'm not of this world, nor its systems of Man. I'm not homeless in a physical sense; I'm homeless in a spiritual sense. This world feels like a foreign land to me, and I suspect I'm not alone amongst my generation.

3
sleepydude 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can buy anything these days.

Ownership is another thing entirely. By the time I pay off anything, it'll be ready to be replaced... Because the only things you can buy are a bare-minimum 50% made in China. They aren't designed to last anymore -- they're designed to fail just as you make your final payment.

That goes for housing construction as well.

My absolute and singular goal above all others is to stay out of debt. To achieve that goal, I must forgo ownership of such things. Debt is slavery, and if I fall for that bear trap then I'm a hypocrite for saying we should resist their slavery apparatus. That's my, admittedly foolish, view on the matter.

24
sleepydude 24 points ago +24 / -0

That's a catch-22. The only reason we're able to come out from under their heel is because, due to these computer systems, truth is finally keeping pace with the lies. If not for the internet, they'd still securely be in charge of the narrative, just like always.

The world we're coming into is not gonna look like anything we can imagine, because we've never actually been free before. The pre-'70s were still years of the Slave Era of humanity. We're just now entering the Freedom Era.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›