1
sukebandeka 1 point ago +2 / -1

It is group think though. That's the epitome of group think.

Questioning it doesn't mean you don't "support" the notion of Q. It means you have the ability to THINK for yourself. If your belief system can't stand up to scrutiny then that's a problem.

I HOPE that things are merely going according to plan, but I cannot pin my life on hopes. That's all.

1
sukebandeka 1 point ago +1 / -0

But why are you believing the poll?

It's being used specifically as a smear?

2
sukebandeka 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is my issue with this "poll" and why I don't a) believe it and b) trust the intentions behind it.

The "30% of Republican voters" meme is being used as a smear and not a validation, confirmation or positive.

It's painting "Republicans" as "QAnons" - something the media controls the narrative on. A narrative they've crafted in a negative light.

30% of Republicans have 'favorable' view of QAnon conspiracy theory, YouGov poll finds

This assertion is validated by the very title of this piece.

If I were to make a guess, I'd say that the YouGov "survey" is a load of shit made up out of thin air, to validate the smear of the republican x qanon connection.

2
sukebandeka 2 points ago +4 / -2

There you go, trying to enforce group think.

This is about thinking for yourself. You HAVE to have a cut off point where if it goes beyond point X isn't no longer part of the plan. You literally have to have that discernment for your own safety and survival.

Otherwise you're just being lead by the nose.

I'm not going to capitulate to group think, this isn't a religion or a cult where you either believe 100% and don't ask questions or you're out.

You should have a wall where you say "Ok, I trust things until THIS point". If you don't you're just letting the situation run roughshod over you. It's submission. It's giving your power away to someone else.

Sorry, but that's not my bag and I won't bend to group think either. I'll think for myself.

-2
sukebandeka -2 points ago +5 / -7

This isn't some group think shit or a cult and I don't care if you think I'm a "shill" for having an alternate opinion, it's not going to shame me into toeing the line.

It's not "shilly" to not be drinking the Kool-Aid. You have to be strong enough to have a cut off point.

1
sukebandeka 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whilst usually I'd agree that one needs to "focus on the positives", ignoring reality also doesn't fix anything. At all. Whatsoever.

Ignoring it lessens the reality of the situation, prompting people to think it's all "going as planned".

That's delusional and walking oneself into a pitfall.

Too much focus on the negative creates an unrealistic situation, but so does focusing too much on the positives.

It's better to be realistic and grounded than ignorant.

0
sukebandeka 0 points ago +5 / -5

Exactly, but look at everyone. They're not willing to fight for it. They think "Q" or "Patriots" are in control and will mop up the mess for them.

It's a fucking joke. Nothing will ever get done, well lose all our rights and people will still say "b-b-but it's part of the plan".

0
sukebandeka 0 points ago +1 / -1

He didn't.

The people who have intelligence at SpaceX did.

0
sukebandeka 0 points ago +1 / -1

lol... Why are you so bothered? Have I insulted your king? Maybe you can go and take a Hyperloop ride to calm down.

2
sukebandeka 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope you're being sarcastic.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
sukebandeka 0 points ago +4 / -4

u/joego is being downvoted, but he's right.

It's very unlikely it will result in much.

What power exactly do "We the people" have?

4
sukebandeka 4 points ago +5 / -1

People are certainly heavily retarded, I remember when people equated cruise control with "car will drive itself". People are really, really dumb sometimes...

2
sukebandeka 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is SO fucking weird.......... I wonder what on earth could have prompted that to happen. No wonder you were creeped out!

I would highly recommend you get a good VPN if you don't have one already, use a secure browser and double down on phone security just to be safe.

27
sukebandeka 27 points ago +27 / -0

but if you get in a tesla and turn on auto pilot without being in the driver seat you are basically asking for an accident to happen.

This.

1
sukebandeka 1 point ago +6 / -5

No, come on dude, that's not at all what it said

Police found one of the passengers in the front right passenger seat, while the other was sitting in the back.

Herman told The New York Times that (as the Times put it) "minutes before the crash, the men's wives watched them leave in the Tesla after they said they wanted to go for a drive and were talking about the vehicle's Autopilot feature.

This was more likely a case of two arrogant pigs who thought teeheehee muh autopilot wAtCH mY cAr dRiVE itZelF.

Like two morons.

So two arrogant, Musk-cocksuckers were trialing an autopilot feature which was created as a gimmick by a greedy company hellbent on gypping rich, arrogrant idiots out of their money.

Everything Elon Musk related ends up being nothing but hot air. Sometimes he's "based" but the above stands. His whole hyperloop rubbish was a very clever pyramid scheme to bilk people, states and counties out of "research" money.

2
sukebandeka 2 points ago +2 / -0

In regards to your last point - have a look at the Atlantic's gloat article on J&J. It's enough to make your stomach turn. This is the narrative they're going with, for whatever reason.

I suspect that reason is $. AD26 is "cheaper" to make because they have the facilities en masse. mRNA is something they can charge a premium for. If people like the Atlantic are gloatpushing it, its usually because $ has exchanged hands.

I don't like Pfizer's extremely aggressive practices when it comes to suppressing studies and influencing. They've spent a lot of money influencing a lot of other markets, suppressing studies and buying journalists/influencers - at great cost to not only customers, but science itself. Not only that, they've used $ and influence to cover up issues with their products - issues resulting in injury and death.

It's not a scientific metric to judge them on, no, but it's a a very reliable observational/psychological one. Behavior you get away with, is behavior you repeat.

5
sukebandeka 5 points ago +5 / -0

"If you’re 16 or over, it is your turn to get vaccinated, no matter where you live. And now there’s now a 9 out of 10 chance that you are located within 5 miles of your vaccine shot."

There's a 10/10 chance you won't die of COVID. What are the better odds?

1
sukebandeka 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't care about the bible.

The "bible" was molested by a bunch of Jews to become something it wasn't. It was used as a social control device. It wasn't the true word of God. It was the word of people who sought to control society, who interpreted what they felt was the word of God.

Modern people have taken God from a loving creator and turned him into a judgmental, spiteful Sky Daddy who they pray to to solve their problems for them. Like some kinda Genie.

He's the energy of creation and the love and acceptance of nature in all its forms, good and bad.

See, there you are, being judgmental and expecting to use the words of God to back you up.

1
sukebandeka 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. See, you misconstrued what I said - I said that idiots who don't absorb facts and just regurgitate non-sense make the MOVEMENT look like drooling retards.

I'm very pro-anti-vax. I just do not like when people get their facts twisted. It makes everyone else look as stupid as they are.

Maybe brush up on that comprehension there, before you insult next time.

1
sukebandeka 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol

You couldn't argue against what I said. Jesus was forsaken by his father to provide protection for everyone else. The aborted fetus* was forsaken by it's parents to provide protection for everyone else.

If one is bad, the other is bad.

Debate the validity of my argument instead of creating personal attacks to divert.

*A likely miscarried or medically aborted fetus. This was the 70s and in a medical setting, so maybe get off your high horse and get down with the people in reality.

2
sukebandeka 2 points ago +2 / -0

Compared to mRNA vaccines, they have a safer profile and a proven track record.

There will always be outliers, but most testing cohorts have demonstrated that AD vaccines are acceptable.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-020-00243-x - scroll down to :

We have previously shown that vaccines based on transgenes that are delivered by recombinant replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 vectors (Ad26) have an acceptable safety profile in humans and are able to induce neutralizing and binding antibodies, CD4 and CD8 T cell responses and a Th1-biased immune response in animals and humans22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33. Furthermore, the availability of industrialized and scalable manufacturing processes makes this an attractive platform for vaccine development.

To see the referenced studies for yourself.

I am not pro-vaccine or pro-covid vaccine, but the sheer stupidity on here when it comes to interpreting data and molesting it to become a confirmation bias fuckfest is embarrassing.

The mRNA carrier vaccines are not safe. If the MSM and assholes alike are pushing mRNAs then they are probably not that much of a good idea.

view more: Next ›