Good for him.
If you live in America, you should learn to speak English. Period.
I think she's just an over-the-top Latina. That doesn't bother me. What bothers me is that no one in the family seems to have taken her under their wing and communicated with her how to actually be an asset to Don Jr.
Her speech at the RNC was cring-ey. You don't have to scream at us!
Except that - hmmm - the people don't seem to care whether he's a "convicted felon". They can see right through that lawfare, and they're voting for the outlaw.
It should keep the Dems from claiming Putin was backing Trump! Lol
TDS at its' finest.
The second amendment is the reason. Pay attention.
"Family" courts have little to no expertise in actually helping families.
We went through a similar situation with our grandsons and son, but in reverse: the boys were in their dad's custody and did well in school, saw their mother and grandparents regularly, and were well adjusted. But their mom, with the help of a shady lawyer, began to badger the boys to convince them she "needed" them to be with her and repeatedly petitioned the court to give her custody. It took five years of "family counselors" who had no training in parental alienation and believed everything she had badgered the boys into saying to finally get a judge who looked at the whole thing and ruled, "This is ridiculous. The boys are not attending school, their mother does not allow them to see their father or grandparents. They did much better with him and should be with their father."
However, they were by that time within 6 months of turning 18, so the judge said, "I'm sorry, it's just too late. We can't make them do anything." Neither boy graduated high school, and the mother is now shacked up with her third live-in boyfriend to whom she is "engaged". What a joke, and what a crime to have destroyed these two boys' futures. We need to figure something out for families like these besides "family court".
Babylon Bee - Tomorrow's News Today
What's the date of this video? Sounds like when one of the Bush's was President?
Nope. He's right.
Try Remdesivir.
Neither he or Kamalala answered questions directly. They'd had practice on their "lines", but mostly obfuscated. Not a great showing for either of them.
The Alaska Natives call them "trickster", as they're known in Native lore as such. I carry on conversations with the ravens I come in contact with. They're ruthless on trash bags in the back of an open truck! Lol
Good. They do not have our best interests at heart, and they should be terrified.
I thought that CNN was not the ally she was expecting... which I find interesting.
I'd be interested in knowing in what program he is running her video. It puts a yellow box around any microexpressions she exhibits. A good "training" video series in microexpressions is the TV series Lie to Me. The first season especially is excellent at showing you microexpressions along with examples from politics and film. I highly recommend it.
Yes. 32 years.
...and a great review for those of us who have been around awhile as well.
"as they vote overwhelmingly Democrat"
...unless... the current administration starts breaking promises to them. Then watch what happens. The backlash could be jarring.
Ahh - thank you!
What does that mean?
The libtards have targeted the population centers of the state hard. Alaskans are independent enough that it's sometimes hard to convince them to work together. They are starting to now, though, between Murkowski, Peltola and ranked choice voting.