And the fraud in 2020 was NOT prosecuted. Still no explanation why they froze the vote count in six swing states, all at the same time. Still no explanation why they sent the poll watchers home for the night, then brought in suitcases of ballots from under tables, shipped them in by truck, and started counting again in the middle of the night without the poll watchers around. Still no explanation about signature verification issues, 2000 mules, Ruby Freeman, Biden’s F-spike, more votes coming in than registered voters, more votes coming in than people who even lived in those counties. No explanation for why observation windows had to be covered over with cardboard. No explanation for the shredded ballots found in the dumpster of a hotel by wedding guests. No explanation for boxes of votes thrown in ditches along roads. No explanation of the Internet videos mailmen made of themselves destroying Trump votes. No explanation for the mystery USB keys brought in and plugged into the Dominion machines. No explanation why all Election Night footage was scrubbed from the Internet.
If they are able to classify documents, wouldn’t they be able to classify plane routes? It seems crazy to me to believe that the establishment makes every single airplane flight public. At a minimum, I would think the flight routes of stealth jets that are designed to avoid radar aren’t then listed on a website so anyone who wants to is able to track their flight. Why even build a stealth jet at all, if you’re required to publicly broadcast its flight path?
I think everyone will fall for it again, that is a problem. I know people think they won’t, and with each scam a few don’t, but once the TV screen goes into overdrive pushing a specific narrative, almost everyone falls for it at first.
Most people - even many people here - are not quite ready to believe that EVERYTHING on TV is a lie. They are still jacked into The Matrix enough that they want to believe that everything on TV is true EXCEPT for those things that have been admitted (by the TV) to be false.
That is how the Ukraine War had like 90% support from day one, on both sides. That was after the Covid Hoax, but so many people who saw through Covid couldn’t then turn around and believe that the TV would ALSO lie to them about a war. And even when the Ukraine bio-labs were exposed, and admitted to in Congress, it wasn’t until Tucker Carlson did that one report on it on the TV that it became true in people’s minds.
Everything broadcast on TV still gets the benefit of the doubt for probably 75% of the population. If the corporate media does another information blitz, where all they report is X all day, every day, for weeks, 75% of people will fall for it and trust it implicitly.
Patel Patriot did a bit of research into her and she WAS a part of Trump’s transition team but the DOD stuff is sketchier. She seems to be repeating Charlie Ward’s reporting. Always be cautious around people who claim to have insider information. When you look at this woman - and I do overall like her - but when you look at her, does she seem like someone who would be tapped into the highest levels of military classification?
I feel like Ivanka got hammered hard too because the left was really terrified of her. Seems to me like she’s practically in protective custody at this point because she would be such a strong target to hurt President Trump. I also have a hunch Obama and his cohorts in The White House were all sharing nudes of Ivanka pulled from her phone or TV cameras or laptop cameras. Changing, showering, etc. It would be hilarious watching the corporate media trying to defend Obama wiretapping Ivanka’s phone so he has something to beat off to.
Well they kept saying President Trump had no “standing” so yeah, apparently he did have to be arrested for the thought-crime of believing Crooked Joe Biden’s F-spike in ballots at 3am after counting stopped was fishy.
The first time he was asked if he was part of the Q team taking down Satanic pedophiles, he slipped in a “And we are, actually”, but he did it with enough plausible deniability that anyone could believe whatever they personally needed to believe. Which was consistent with the Q proofs. They always had that little bit of plausible deniability that the people who weren’t open to what Q was disclosing could continue to keep their fingers in their ears because “the choice to know will be yours”.
What is “non-outcome determinative fraud”? What would be the point of committing fraud except to change the outcome of an election? That’s literally the entire point.
And since when has successful completion of a crime been the determining factor in the validity of a crime? If someone robs a bank but they bungle it, they aren’t clear of bank robbery. If a man rapes a woman but doesn’t cum, it’s still rape. We don’t tell her, “But he didn’t successfully complete the rape so stop complaining.”
Does anyone else think Bush Sr., Cheney, and Rumsfeld were the ones plotting 9/11 and they kept W out of the loop? I think they thought he was too dumb to know about it and that he’d perform better as President if he thought it was a terrorist attack. When the aide comes in and tells him while he’s reading that storybook, he looks genuinely surprised and stumped. He doesn’t look like a guy who knew it was coming.
If this is what happened, it might make sense why when the notes came, Jeb turned to W and he had that sheepish look like he flipped.
Originally I think it was meant to be an undeniable Q proof linking Q to Trump, but since Trump has retruthed Q over 600 times, it almost wouldn’t make a difference. The people who refuse to acknowledge the obvious connection between Q and Trump probably won’t change their minds even with Trump posting that exact tweet.
The tweet would still have value as some sort of indicator that there has been a shift, or that Q team is moving into a new phase of the plan.
A famous brand changing its name is really unusual since brand recognition is so important. Coca-Cola won’t even change its font, and it’s been probably one hundred years.
So when Facebook said they were now “Meta” and replaced their logo with that droopy loop, it seemed super odd to me. I started thinking about President Trump’s executive order about confiscating the wealth and assets of any individual or company participating in child sex trafficking. Was Facebook confiscated so Zuckerberg started a new company called Meta to keep the money laundering and child trafficking going?
Then all these other companies started torching their own brands too. Disney. Bud Light. Bed, Bath & Beyond. NFL. FoxNews. It was like they were all intentionally trying to fail. Very strange. Could it be because ownership of the assets had been swapped and the people still working there are now being instructed to bring those companies down to make them worthless as assets?
Now Twitter, a brand Musk paid billions for, is being swapped to X. Again, very strange.
Like what’s next? Ford suddenly decides they want to be known as Dorf? NBC says they are now PeacockTV? Netflix rebrands as MovieSpace?
The worship of Obama and the hatred of Trump seem to be two sides of the same mental disorder.
Remember the video of those kids singing that ode to Obama in 2008? Take those kids and their parents, tack on eight years, and then have Trump come down the escalator. They must have felt insanely threatened.
It’s not about precedent in the legal code but precedent in the eyes of the public.
The theory is that if Trump had tried to arrest the Clinton Family, the Bush Family, the Biden Family, and the Obama Family all on day one of his Presidency, it would have made him look like the Hitleresque tyrant the corporate media had painted him as, and I think most people would have been against it.
So how do you arrest all your political opponents without it looking like it’s sketchy? Perhaps if they do it first, and without reason, they open the public’s mind to the concept - at which point it could be flipped around on them. Much easier to arrest Obama for raping and killing a child after Obama arrested Trump for jaywalking.
People think Joe Biden was stupid for using his son as his bag man, but look at it more from Obama’s perspective. Obama sets up Biden to be his bag man. Biden sets up Hunter to be HIS bag man. And Hunter sets up Archer to be HIS bag man. Obama would probably feel pretty insulated at that point, with three fall guys to protect him. Joe probably figured Hunter was close, but trustworthy, plus the family connection makes laundering the money a little easier, like the $70,000 monthly rent he was charging him.
In his show the other day, Adams took a poke at Q, then proceeded to repeat about three different insights that Q established years ago. He didn’t literally say “only at the precipice will people find the will to change” but that was the point he made, and then he also started talking about how this was all being presented like a movie.
This could start to happen more and more, with more non-Q people starting to merge with Q without them even realizing it.
It does seem odd that these snobbish cabal types would invite this weirdo from Maine to their parties. I’m not sure if King is cabal, or a cabal wannabe, or if he has TDS, or if he is terrified that if he doesn’t publicly push for the cabal, they will cancel him for all his old books. If they could cancel Dr. Seuss and J.K. Rowling, they could easily cancel Stephen King. His book “Rage” was already pulled because they started claiming it was responsible for school shootings.
If HRC is arrested five years to the day that Q said she would be, there are actual Trump supporters who would continue to deny the proof, just as they’ve denied all the others, or the 600 times Trump has retruthed Q.
It’s hard to believe that HRC could actually be arrested and these people would continue to hate Q and say “nothing is happening”. The goalposts would move and they would say, “Well, it might have been five years to the day, but that’s not what Q said, so Q is still wrong and I am still the very smart boy who wrote a lot of words.”
Honestly, the hatred for Q goes beyond logic. It’s irrational in the same way the hatred for Trump is irrational. I’m not sure what would crack it for these people at this point. They’ve invested too much of their ego and identity into hating Q that even if President Trump himself comes to their house and verifies Q to them in person, it won’t be enough.
Look at how they spent the first three years claiming Q was a LARP. Remember how convinced they were of that? And now you don’t even hear the LARP theory anymore. They’ve all switched over to “Q is a CIA psyop”. They don’t even know what the fuck they think which is why they keep swapping arguments, coming up with new excuses, moving goalposts, etc. They think they’re so brilliant, but none of them have read the actual Q posts themselves, so they’re always making their arguments from ignorance, and they know it. The way they reduce 5000+ Q posts to three words - “Trust the Plan” - shows how little research they’ve actually done.
The reason, of course, why Q haters have never read the Q posts is because once you read them, you stop being a Q hater. That’s why they HAVE to stay in ignorance. They know if they read even a few, their ego is going to crash.
This one seems to be condensed from the original which was about twice the length, and also went a bit more into Q. I remember in the full length there is a section about what happened when President Trump first visited the Queen and laid the NSA’s evidence on her. I also think it went into Trump’s visit to Japan before he met with China, his visit with China and how he refused to “cross the line” into the Forbidden City, and how he leveraged China into the plan. It also had sections on his first visit with Putin, the soccer ball, and then how he negotiated with North Korea and cut those strings.