Anyone else thinking this Oprah doesn’t look that much like the old Oprah? I know, I know, face lifts and Botox, but I’m not convinced those things alter a person’s appearance this much. It’s like their whole aura or something is off. I’m not making any definitive claims here, just an observation.
I’m not sure what kind of sauce we exactly expect to find, given this is hidden history stuff. I have also watched a few hours of interviews with this Gould fellow to learn about his quantum grammar system. It’s fairly interesting stuff - I think the series is called War Castles and is on Rumble - but he makes some wild claims that would be hard to verify. The idea of a new grammar for legal documents that prevents errors in double meanings of words and subjective interpretation, that has to work both backwards and forwards, is definitely intriguing.
Also, this video by Sergeant Robert Horton fills in more of the possible history of what has been going on. It’s up to each person to decide how credible this sounds, and I admit parts of it do sound fantastic, but overall this makes quite a bit of sense to me, and the vibe I get from this guy is not that he is a liar or a grifter. Even the idea that someone made this all up seems like a stretch. It’s too weirdly detailed and doesn’t fit with the structure of normal lies.
https://rumble.com/v1203f0-sergeant-robert-horton-war-castles-overview.html
I watch the Devolution Power Hour all the time but they seem way too dismissive of this. The President Trump retruth seems too easily dismissed and the skeptics overall seem to treat Trump like he just scattershot retruths whatever he feels like without rhyme or reason, or that he would retruth this to highlight Election Fraud but that we should ignore everything else she says.
But I don’t think President Trump is scattershot in his messaging at all. If the whole story of USA Inc. is bullshit, and he would know, why would he lead so many of his supporters astray? What - he couldn’t find a different video about Election Fraud that DIDN’T contain the Vatican gold and USA Inc. stuff? That doesn’t seem believable to me.
Sure, President Trump’s retruth isn’t definitive proof in and of itself, but it’s a big hint of what direction he wants the narrative to go. Flynn then reposting the video is further confirmation. Of course it’s the same situation as with Q, where they always leave that little bit of plausible deniability for the people who need to keep believing in the status quo.
To me this whole retruth suggests that this is where things are headed, but that they aren’t ready to definitively state it yet, so the idea is first being deployed amongst the anons to prepare the mainstream.
I think this might be it.
This one seems to be condensed from the original which was about twice the length, and also went a bit more into Q. I remember in the full length there is a section about what happened when President Trump first visited the Queen and laid the NSA’s evidence on her. I also think it went into Trump’s visit to Japan before he met with China, his visit with China and how he refused to “cross the line” into the Forbidden City, and how he leveraged China into the plan. It also had sections on his first visit with Putin, the soccer ball, and then how he negotiated with North Korea and cut those strings.
And the fraud in 2020 was NOT prosecuted. Still no explanation why they froze the vote count in six swing states, all at the same time. Still no explanation why they sent the poll watchers home for the night, then brought in suitcases of ballots from under tables, shipped them in by truck, and started counting again in the middle of the night without the poll watchers around. Still no explanation about signature verification issues, 2000 mules, Ruby Freeman, Biden’s F-spike, more votes coming in than registered voters, more votes coming in than people who even lived in those counties. No explanation for why observation windows had to be covered over with cardboard. No explanation for the shredded ballots found in the dumpster of a hotel by wedding guests. No explanation for boxes of votes thrown in ditches along roads. No explanation of the Internet videos mailmen made of themselves destroying Trump votes. No explanation for the mystery USB keys brought in and plugged into the Dominion machines. No explanation why all Election Night footage was scrubbed from the Internet.
If they are able to classify documents, wouldn’t they be able to classify plane routes? It seems crazy to me to believe that the establishment makes every single airplane flight public. At a minimum, I would think the flight routes of stealth jets that are designed to avoid radar aren’t then listed on a website so anyone who wants to is able to track their flight. Why even build a stealth jet at all, if you’re required to publicly broadcast its flight path?
I think everyone will fall for it again, that is a problem. I know people think they won’t, and with each scam a few don’t, but once the TV screen goes into overdrive pushing a specific narrative, almost everyone falls for it at first.
Most people - even many people here - are not quite ready to believe that EVERYTHING on TV is a lie. They are still jacked into The Matrix enough that they want to believe that everything on TV is true EXCEPT for those things that have been admitted (by the TV) to be false.
That is how the Ukraine War had like 90% support from day one, on both sides. That was after the Covid Hoax, but so many people who saw through Covid couldn’t then turn around and believe that the TV would ALSO lie to them about a war. And even when the Ukraine bio-labs were exposed, and admitted to in Congress, it wasn’t until Tucker Carlson did that one report on it on the TV that it became true in people’s minds.
Everything broadcast on TV still gets the benefit of the doubt for probably 75% of the population. If the corporate media does another information blitz, where all they report is X all day, every day, for weeks, 75% of people will fall for it and trust it implicitly.
Patel Patriot did a bit of research into her and she WAS a part of Trump’s transition team but the DOD stuff is sketchier. She seems to be repeating Charlie Ward’s reporting. Always be cautious around people who claim to have insider information. When you look at this woman - and I do overall like her - but when you look at her, does she seem like someone who would be tapped into the highest levels of military classification?
I feel like Ivanka got hammered hard too because the left was really terrified of her. Seems to me like she’s practically in protective custody at this point because she would be such a strong target to hurt President Trump. I also have a hunch Obama and his cohorts in The White House were all sharing nudes of Ivanka pulled from her phone or TV cameras or laptop cameras. Changing, showering, etc. It would be hilarious watching the corporate media trying to defend Obama wiretapping Ivanka’s phone so he has something to beat off to.
Well they kept saying President Trump had no “standing” so yeah, apparently he did have to be arrested for the thought-crime of believing Crooked Joe Biden’s F-spike in ballots at 3am after counting stopped was fishy.
If The President of the United States does not have the ability to declassify government documents, then who does he have to go to above him to get permission?
Has this question ever been asked, let alone answered?
I would like to know who the person is above the President of the United States, what their name is, and how/when they were duly elected by the American People.