They do this with the word “toxic” too. “Toxic” used to have a specific scientific meaning. Now it’s just metaphorical and can be applied to anyone or anything they don’t like. I’ve noticed they’ve started doing it with “poison” too. People on the right also like to call everything “poison”. It’s not just “not very nutritious”, it’s “poison”. It gets everyone jacked up on fear hormones so they’re in constant fight or flight mode and hooked on angry/frightening clickbait headlines.
Since the Q drops started, people have been anticipating the Epstein Scandal going mainstream, and for most of the past ten years, the corporate media has done everything to mock it and dismiss it. So if the goal has been to wake people up to child sex trafficking, then that goal was pretty much stalled out during Biden. There was that one movie that went mainstream, but the corporate media did everything they could to belittle it and dismiss it and sabotage movie theaters against it.
But now after all this, THEY have the moral high ground on the issue!
Of course, it’s their usual total Clown World inversion tactic. Just like Biden was caught on tape admitting to a quid pro quo with Ukraine. so they impeached Trump for quid pro quo with Ukraine. They didn’t even change the country for their fake story on that one.
Remember when HRC colluded with Russians to build the Steele Dossier to rig the election with misinformation, so they started an investigation into Trump for colluding with Russia to rig the election with misinformation? Exact same tactic.
What about when an Antifa shot Charlie Kirk and they reported it as a MAGA shot Charlie Kirk?
Why did we expect the Epstein Scandal to go any differently with these gaslighting liars?
It’s funny. The way he is dressed is pretty standard for an inner city black man, but step back and look at it and ask yourself if black men would dress like this if they hadn’t been programmed into it. He’s got long hair like a lady, and which would only make him vulnerable in a fight. He’s wearing bright colors like a woman peacocking her figure. His pants and jacket are two sizes too big, making him look like a kid playing dress up. The fabric looks silky and soft, like women’s clothing, and it poofs out like a dress. Everything is stamped with a corporate brand of ownership. He’s got this goofy oversized watch even though he probably has no set schedule, so it’s totally ostentatious. If he isn’t wearing it here, there’s a good chance he has multiple piercings, like a woman, and wears all sorts of jingly jangly jewelry, like a woman.
It’s almost like a humiliation ritual. Like there’s some scheming creeps in a boardroom thinking what other ridiculous, self-destructive, womanly thing they can sell to black men. Maybe mascara? All the toughest black dudes will start wearing cat eyes and glossing their lips?
On the Covid injection, I think Trump telling people NOT to take it would have been the worst move and also the move his enemies expected him to take. Remember, Trump said years ago that if he knew how obstructionist his opponents were going to be, he would have come down the escalator and said he DEFINITELY doesn’t want to build a wall. Everyone laughed, because he was joking, but I think there was a wink of truth in that joke.
As someone who refused the vaccine, I appreciated that this could be done WITHOUT ALSO giving your employer the additional excuse to fire you for being a “racist Trump supporter”. We even had people on the left (the old-school granola liberal types) also pushing back against the injection, and that was because Trump gave us THE GIFT of not making it a proxy binary debate of pro- vs. anti-Trump positions, where the debate isn’t even the debate, the debate is ALWAYS just about Trump.
Also, I can’t imagine what would have given the Democrats even MORE motivation to force-inject the world than Trump coming out against it. Remember too that Trump was in a fairly unprecedented position of, basically, the entire world shutting themselves indoors and refusing to go back to work or leave the house. I mean it’s pretty fucking mental. I’m not sure how many months/years any country could go with even 45% of their citizens locking themselves indoors and refusing to participate in the economy. It’s not even an unemployment rate at that point, it’s a NON-PARTICIPATION rate.
I appreciate very much that President Trump did everything he did to help bring people out of their mass world hysteria over “Coronavirus”.
That’s interesting. I wasn’t sure if it was in American jurisdiction or not.
It’s actually sort of odd they DIDN’T do this outside of America, like on some island whose legal sovereignty is more contested. This tends to lend credence to the theory that Epstein Island was a CIA-Mossad co-production (Epstein for CIA, Maxwell for Mossad), otherwise I’m not sure what the strategic benefit of Mossad doing this in American territory would be.
It seems to me that Epstein Island isn’t really under the jurisdiction of the DOJ or FBI anyway. The island itself was in international waters, right? And the globalist cabal is international too, so wouldn’t the military be the ones in charge of any investigation, prosecution, or clandestine classified missions? Has the corporate media ever asked about Epstein or the island to anyone in the U.S. military?
After Sessions, Whitaker, Barr, Wray, Bondi, and Kash have all seemed to be frozen in their ability to move on this, doesn’t it suggest they are being told this is basically outside their jurisdiction and classification level? Doesn’t it seem like there is something they cannot say that would explain things. People tend to jump to “they are all pedophiles” or “they were all threatened”, but what about the more simple explanation that they cannot reveal everything they know (and that they themselves don’t know everything either).
It also seems to me that the cabal can’t really be dismantled through traditional legal channels, and that a different, non-public form of justice and retribution is at work here.
I think the challenge people have is when the footage they are seeing doesn’t match with what they would expect. Like there was never a single smartphone video of the hospital hallways overcrowded with dying Covid patients. We saw empty hospitals with nurses doing choreographed dance routines and I once saw a video of a guy breaking into a hospital with his camera to show that the Covid floor was empty. But there should have been hundreds if not hundreds of thousands of videos of chaos in the hospitals from the overflowing Covid patients, like the news kept saying was happening.
In my opinion, it’s not a terrible strategic cover to go in and clean up the Marxist influence in the university system. It could also be good media cover to clean up the anti-white bias without even mentioning white people.
It’s possible they have been under military control for years. The question is how do you undo or fix a multi-decade CIA brainwashing program? Is simply revealing it and ending it enough? Could a brainwashed population even see or accept the program if they’ve already been brainwashed? Or would the brainwashing have to be systematically reversed?
Many people think President Trump could call a press conference, declassify all government secrets, and then after that the world would know the truth. But I think we’ve seen that this wouldn’t actually work. People are too attached to their beliefs, and so even if they hear the truth, they cannot easily accept it or even process it. Generally they outright reject it.
I mean look at how hard it is to get anyone to really accept that Obama wiretapped Trump. Even Trump supporters who believe it have a hard time really getting outraged by it because the corporate media (and even the alternative media) don’t really push it or talk about it, and somehow it fades and seems unimportant. Same as Obama’s chef being drowned on his property. Kind of seems forgettable, even though it should be a huge scandal.
Vance is brilliant but Trump is a genius. Think of the highlights. “Only Rosie O’Donnell.” “Because you’d be in jail.” “Locker room talk.” With “locker room talk”, he took a scandal that would have forced any other politician to drop out, and he neutralized it with THREE WORDS. That is next level shit. Vance is great and very smooth in his delivery, but Trump actually changes the culture, Trump changes the way people think.
Would anyone listen? “Trump is forcing the military to say this anti-science nonsense. Ignore!”
Seems like the corporate media would have easily been able to make people believe the CDC, the FDA, the medical community, and the scientific journals were more credible on a medical issue than “Trump’s army”.
People like to pretend they always knew the CDC and the FDA and the medical community and scientific journals were all corrupt nonsense and that vaccines were bad, and a handful of people did, but MOST people trusted all these people and all these organizations and called anyone who questioned it an “anti-vaxxer”. People forget what a slur “anti-vaxxer” was before the Covid Hoax. If someone found out you were an “anti-vaxxer”, you could lose your friends, your job, your children.
“Trump didn’t get hit with a bullet, it was a little piece of glass from a teleprompter, okay - well, fine, the teleprompters were in mint condition so okay, fine, but it still wasn’t a bullet, it was just SHRAPNEL from a bullet, a little teeny tiny piece of shr - okay, no, that’s not a thing, forget that, what it ACTUALLY was - it was fake blood, see, like from a squib, and what he did was actually nothing, because none of this even happened, bullet? shooter? as if! There was nothing. Nothing happened.”
“Biden had a cold.”
Did you fall for that one too?
What about, “Joe Biden is as sharp as a tack. He’s never been sharper.”
The experts said it so you must have believed that one too.
I mean, heck, it’s not like the experts would ever LIE. They would NEVER forge a fake study and publish it in The Lancet to get the cure to a virus in the middle of a pandemic pulled from the shelves. That kind of thing JUST DOESN’T HAPPEN.
We might have cracked the liberal programming and the corporate media knows it. We naively thought the way to wake up liberals was with stories of raped and murdered women and children. They talk so much about the “war on women” and “do it for the children” but for some reason they never seemed to care.
Then we thought maybe it was because the women and children being raped and murdered were white, and that’s why liberals yawned at the horrors. “They’re white. Who cares? Bitch deserved to get raped and killed.” That was their attitude. They wouldn’t say it loud, but that’s how they felt.
So we went to them instead with stories of black and brown women who were raped and murdered by illegal aliens. Surely, surely, this would get through to them!
But they STILL didn’t care. We were baffled. But now it makes sense. It was the pets. It was always the pets.
Liberals view reality like a movie. If a woman gets raped and killed, even if she’s black, they care about as much as they do when someone gets killed in a movie. It’s all fake to them. But pets? They CAN’T STAND when a pet dies in a movie. Even when it actually IS pretend, they can’t handle it. They sob. They get angry. They get outraged.
Illegal aliens kill pets. Liberals can’t argue for this one. They can’t dismiss it. They can’t laugh it off.
Where are the clips of her “baiting” him? They keep saying it, like a scripted talking point, but no clips? If it was true, the clips would be everywhere. But they can’t show the clips because they won’t match what they claim. It’s better for them to repeat it over and over and over again and try to reshape everyone’s memory of the debate. As soon as they show a clip, it will undermine that effort. The clip will make Trump look good. It will show him making a forceful point.
Compare that to the Biden debate. There were clips galore. And the clips made him look bad.
That’s how you know it’s gaslighting. They want to shape your perception, but without any backing evidence of what you are meant to perceive.
Where are the clips of her “baiting” him? They keep saying it, like a scripted talking point, but no clips? If it was true, the clips would be everywhere. But they can’t show the clips because they won’t match what they claim. It’s better for them to repeat it over and over and over again and try to reshape everyone’s memory of the debate. As soon as they show a clip, it will undermine that effort. The clip will make Trump look good. It will show him making a forceful point.
Compare that to the Biden debate. There were clips galore. And the clips made him look bad.
That’s how you know it’s gaslighting. They want to shape your perception, but without any backing evidence of what you are meant to perceive.
If he destroyed Harris like he did Biden, they could swap her out for someone else. Probably Hillary or Obama. Even if it’s “against the rules”, exceptions could be made. Especially if Republicans allow it. The corporate media would say it’s not fair not to have a Democrat ticket on the ballot because of some technicality of a candidate being swapped out, and Republicans would allow it, saying they don’t want to win by default.
Even when Trump appears to be losing (the Mar-a-Lago raid, the mugshot), to me there has been this sense from Trump himself that he was never actually worried. Like somehow this was all part of a controlled demolition of the Deep State and an exposure rollout in an Information War. So whenever the corporate media would start going crazy about how they were about to “get Trump”, I’ve laughed and thought, “How is this going to backfire on them now?”
People like to mock the idea of the White Hats having any sort of plan, but looking back at the ten years since Trump ran for President, and how he has nimbly navigated manufactured scandals and unprecedented attacks, and it would be hard to script it any better for Trump and MAGA. Shouldn’t just that be enough for people to question the possibility of some sort of “plan”?
Even with Epstein, which people like to say his administration bungled, all of those “errors” also seemed to produced some benefit. For one thing, the Epstein narrative had all but stalled out, and by making himself the target, Trump somehow took it mainstream. But now more and more seems to be clearing him as others get more and more exposed. And the people who went all in on Epstein can’t back out so easily now. They even front-loaded the Trump outrage to burn it out quickly and early before releasing the bigger shit. That’s very interesting to me, because looking at it now, Democrats would probably like to have some of that ammo to throw in the mix now.
I mean we just had HRC on camera being asked about frazzledrip. How is that not an Overton window shift?