If he had sent starlink equipment to the Russians too I would see your point. While I have no clue of the logistics that go with balancing a positive public image, I still think its obviously clear that this particular group of events was not the smartest hill to climb if he wants to portray a true neutral stance. And then we must not forget his PR challenge of a fight with putin. Do real good, for all, equally, or just stay out of it, or die on your side of the hill.
its my understanding that if the president is on-board it HAS to be AF1 callsign. I was doing some searching too, apparently Reagans callsign was changed from af1 midflight because of resignation. fingers crossed right? lol. probably just site error though.
this is exactly what I was looking for, and the word I should have used: per diem. thank you. SO we give them a $13 breakfast, $14 lunch, and a $23 dinner (if parameters on this site are set for washington), everyday if they so choose. interesting.
totally agree, but I meant it when I said it was a simple question. its either A or B and I want to know which one, I understand its a minute detail and inconsequential. But in a time where we are told to spend sparingly on meals, by those people, it to me seems worthy to know if we are actually, by either "law" or "standard practices" using taxpayer money to supply things, like the capitol cafe kitchens pantry's.
right? especially with what we know now and how the inter-workings of the group operates. My thoughts always go to the people who were brought into the group and then told they had to do something nefarious or cruel to another human, or suffer X fate, and then having to live with it, or TRY to get out, only to be whacked for safety in the secrecy of it all. Some dirty shit.
good point.