2
winn 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see. Thx for the clarification. The emails just made me go "wait, why are we using deep state AI on a free speech platform"

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was watching a show called Manifest where a plane goes into another dimension and when they return home the government tries to do experiments on the passengers to develop DNA weapons to use against enemy nations, which sparked this comment. It reminded me of what was going on in Nazi Germany or the Cold War. So I was thinking about say, how they gave people acid to see if it would be a truth serum

by winn
2
winn 2 points ago +2 / -0

The thing is it didn't sound too good to be true. I believe tech like this is possible / already exists. Part of me thinks this guy might be running a fertilization op

3
winn 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's hard for me to think of examples of nationalism and patriotism which go too far. But a couple just dawned on me:

  • putting your country first at the expense of other countries, such as robbing their resources or running destabilization ops on them to prevent them from maturing into stable nations.

  • putting your country first at the expense of your own citizens by experimenting on them in order to develop weapons, psyops and weaponized biotech to be used on potential enemies.

If any intel agents read this, I'm praying for you.

by winn
2
winn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn. It sounds like a plausible tech. I'll take it down though

by winn
1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

it's from January though

by winn
2
winn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hmm? Am I being trolled

3
winn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tyvm. Again in both articles there is no sauce for the retraction... makes me wonder is this an op?

1
winn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fyi you can save that pdf, scroll right, click the >> button thing and hit save

2
winn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fair enough however I took your reply as dismissive and disrespectful when I was stating a fact as respectfully as I could. The extra clicks isn't the only reason to title posts with relevent keywords, if someone wants to find the post using the Search function, it won't be found unless you write what it's about in the title. & I don't worry about the downdoots I get em all the time 🤣

Cheers fren

2
winn 2 points ago +3 / -1

I don't keep track of who posts what I read the titles. Up to standard kek. Titling your post properly is not my standard it's common sense

downdooters love clickbait and spam and read RRN (:

0
winn 0 points ago +4 / -4

You have no idea how many "1 clicks" I make in a given session on GAW, 8kun, etc. To open a tweet from here for example I have to click the post title, then click the post title again in order for it to launch to the actual tweet. It takes 10-15 seconds. Repeat this over and over and my time is cut by enough of a % to piss me off if I keep landing on things I didn't care to read.

I could say the same to you: How hard is it to write a proper title? I do believe this is a rule on here. Shall we ping the mods to check?

edit- I just saw that you told me to "suck it up", didn't notice that part. How about this, you quit being a lazy fucking cunt?

edit2- now the comment is gone, making me look like an asshole 🤣

15
winn 15 points ago +17 / -2

It'd be nice if you said what the post was about in the title.

Example: Canada's landscape of unelected government officials

It just helps save time when deciding what to click, especially for us who can't use the tweet embed feature due to browser privacy settings (;

2
winn 2 points ago +2 / -0
  • comes out of literally nowhere
  • goes mega viral in a year off a neutral topic
  • begins to steer audience into Muhjoo

the template of a cabal plant 🌱

2
winn 2 points ago +2 / -0

So basically ~90% of the government will be one big AI program. Got it. What could go wrong?

view more: Next ›