This needs to be EXPOSED …. We need to STOP this !!!🤨
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (47)
sorted by:
ALL ENEMIES
FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC
Obama wouldn't even put his hand to heart to pledge to our flag!!
And don't forget what Big Mike said about the flag.
Wouldn't matter if he did :
https://illinoisfamily.org/islam-sharia/knowing-four-arabic-words-may-save-our-civilization-from-islamic-takeover/
He, Obama, is most certainly human TRASH.
This is a good start!
Let's replace Chem Trails with pork blood by products and they would have to self deport.
Love it, the air would smell like bacon.
Islam isn't the only religion that also has its own conflicting allegiances.
We nose!
Nor only one that promotes lying to non-members.
https://illinoisfamily.org/islam-sharia/knowing-four-arabic-words-may-save-our-civilization-from-islamic-takeover/
This just seems like common sense to me. However, in lieu of common sense, we need to get a law passed to stop this shit.......along with dual citizenship. It seems politicians just don't take the oath seriously.
yes...."along with dual citizenship"!
And no gays or trannies, not because I have any beef with them, but because they are mentally ill.
No dual citizens either
Amen !!!
When I was a child I swore allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic, for which it stands.
I didn't really have a choice in the matter. All children at the time were forced to take an oath to be subservient to the Republic, AKA the people who ran the US Government.
How'd that work out for me? Not nearly as well as it appeared on the brochure.
You say now, "swear allegiance to the Constitution." Presumably that takes care of any of the fuckery. It most certainly does not. That is Controlled Opposition talking. The problems with the Republic of today, and all of it's laws, are perfectly consistent, even encouraged within the original Constitution. So to you I say, fuck you, and fuck Paul Revere's horse he didn't actually run in on. No one gets my oath of fealty. No one is my master other than myself.
You want to take care of the problems of ideologies? Learn the problems with the ones that you believe in first. Learn the real history, and all the required context that proves that all of those ideologies were created by the same entity to control the populace through Controlled Opposition. When enough people learn how the world actually works (through propaganda controlled by controlled opposition), I suggest the problem of ideologies takes care of itself.
And replaced by the problem of mythologies.
I suggest the desire to couple a belief system with the truth (the actual Truth) is a part of the journey; the human condition. Only those who hold on to the ability to internally ask questions on all topics, true skeptics, are capable of decoupling that desire sufficiently to keep asking questions, no matter the apparent evidence or experience.
I suggest every single person has been strictly guided on all of their ideologies. For example, unless you are the originator of an ideology, it has been created for you. Ditto our mythologies. As far as I can find, every single ideology and every single mythology that has any influence today have all been created by the same entity, carefully cultivated and pushed through their propaganda systems (usually including "propaganda of the deed"). If people learn that all of those mainstream ideologies from the left and the right are all created by that same entity, that will likely (hopefully) create a lot more true skeptics. At the least, it will likely create a larger pool of "sides" of reasoned debate than the current. It will also prove to be less fraught with anger and violence in our debates, because all of our extreme views are also created by that same entity through the same method through their propaganda systems.
Curious that you refer to an "entity," but give it no name. Plenty of ideologies and mythologies that have nothing to do with reality, which is not a sign of skepticism but of psychosis. You also confuse skepticism and curiosity as a motive for questions. No room in this description for beliefs derived from reality, instead of an independent belief system that must be "coupled" with reality.
Telling people the name is irrelevant. You can't tell people, you must show them. If you are really interested you should read my report. It isn't about telling anyone anything. It is about showing the evidence. It itself is not complete unfortunately. There are five more sections intended. They are mostly written, but these things take time, especially since my life has been rather difficult of late.
Nevertheless, what is there will give sufficient evidence of a group of people at the top of society ruling from the shadows by the methods I suggest that it at least gives an appreciation of my claims.
I suggest ALL ideologies and mythologies are wrong. Indeed, my investigation suggests that all such things are intentionally wrong (though my investigation suggests they all use interesting elements of the truth to create their falsehoods). They do create a certain psychosis as you suggest, but the reasons are not obvious.
I'm not trying to tell you what the truth is. I don't know myself. I suggest neither do you. All I can do is show the evidence of what I've found. That evidence suggests the statements I am making. To see the beginnings of that evidence chain, I suggest you read my report.
To be fair it takes time to read. It is a body of evidence, and, as it was intentionally constructed, that body requires ALL of the evidence, in sequence, to make sense. Thus you have to begin in the beginning and read all the middle to make it to the end for the case to be debated reasonably. In addition, as stated, it's less than half way done (maybe a quarter or less). Even so, what is there is more than enough to create a solid body of evidence to the claims.
I'm content with science and history.
I can provide evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that both Science and History are a formal ideology and a carefully crafted myth. The single system of "Academic Knowledge" is designed and strictly controlled by the aforenamed entity.
The evidence shows not only that my claims are true, but how those false belief systems have been constructed, who has done it, for what purpose it is has been done, for what purpose it persists, and in some cases, gives some evidence of what the most important parts have been purposefully omitted, suggesting the actual reality or at least pointing in the right direction (as opposed to the false current one).
Further, if my claim is true as the evidence suggests, adhering to your beliefs and pushing your myths and histories is exactly the psychosis you accuse others of.
Well, your take on science is bullshit. It is tested all the time by the fact that we can measure reality and construct technology. Are you going to say the technology is a "carefully crafted myth"? That I can't talk to my wife while she is in Africa, or that it is not possible to get there in 24 hours?
Just because we deal with existence by way of concepts does not derogate them into "ideology," whatever you think that to mean. In order to declare that any are false, one would have to know what is true. Which by your all-inclusive definition is impossible.
What "evidence"? Write a book. Spell it out. Be ignored. If you know the truth, let us know. Tell us why jetliners can't fly and telephones can't work. That lasers can't exist, etc., etc. Either we have working technology and the ideas behind that are correct and workable by demonstration, or....what? I've seen head trips before, in college, among the enlightened, and this is no different. You might as well understand that I am a No Sale.
I remember listening to a Muslim man, (he spoke calm and confident) he said we're a patient people, we're having five, six children, you're having one or none, soon will be the majority, and will vote in the laws we want. (Sharia law ring a bell) You do not need to be a prophet (like Daniel) to interpret the writing on the wall, ask the UK. A God-fearing nation has to be compassionate, but it doesn't have to be stupid. Is it not written "WISE AS A SERPENT HARMLESS AS A DOVE"
*socialism should be included under communism for this
I'd say the same thing about Catholics but I'd get burned at the proverbial GAW stake 🪵
Curious…do Catholics want to kill you if you don’t convert…and lie to your infidel face saying otherwise?
keks in ~<1700AD
their official "moderate" stances are quite novel...
imagine, if you will, the pope ever regained his "temporal powers"... you could kiss your freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, right to bear arms, good the fuck bye.
and then there's this little interesting anecdote- https://anotepad.com/note/read/xie4222w
the total picture being quite dasting.
Rev. 17
The Vatican barely has any worldwide power. And their fanaticism is a sliver of Islam. They’ll never be a risk to the world as is islam.
you've got a lot to learn grasshopper
We’ll see. As a recovering Roman Catholic, I have some insight.
Godbless you fren, and brother in Christ <3
for the record I don't hate Catholics, I hate the system / institution
Hear hear!!
u/#catdance
Send a message to Dan and Don Jr
The same can be said for ALL dual-citizens, too. You don't, and can't have full allegiance to a country if you still have allegiance to another. The practice of hyphenated allegiance, aka Jewish-American, Mexican-American, etc needs to stop and ALL of our politicians/bureaucrats at every level have to relinquish their dual citizenship if they're to remain in office in this country.
Oh, I do agree
The Constitution is the license by which government has any power. The source of that power is us. We do not need to ask government permission, government needs to ask us. That very simple concept is lost on all people in government service, and 99.9% of Americans.
Absolutely!!!!
I swear allegiance to the Lord our God, If I were to ever hold a public office, I would swear to uphold the constitution and the rights it is intended to prevent the Government from messing with, not swear allegiance to it. I would never swear allegiance to man's law.
This is the way it should be worded, uphold it, not swear allegiance, Don't like it... Don't care.
I would think that is already an ignored Law.
Reeeeeee!