5
zedrexvsyrex 5 points ago +5 / -0

I’ve been saying this for a while now. Abso-fucking-lutely. I wrote these two comments a while back and saved it, not all of it is about the 17th, but it expands upon it even more:

The early 1900s was when the seeds for corruption first began to take root. You had first-wave feminism, the First Red Scare, the establishment of the Federal Reserve, the implementation of credit from banks, and the 17th amendment (it made the voting of senators a direct vote rather than via state legislatures; this makes it easier to corrupt the senate because most people are idiots who will vote for whoever the media says to vote for and have no business in politics, and also because it made senators beholden to the people financing their campaigns). One thing that I find particularly interesting is how feminism coincided with the First Red Scare. Communism, a liberal ideology, promotes that everyone is the same (i.e. "equal") and always promotes feminism; it's not a coincidence that the Red Scare and first-wave feminism came with each other. The US really did begin to be infiltrated then. The funniest part about all of it is that feminism completely died down once the Great Depression hit. Can't have equal rights between men and women when times are tough lol.

The fucking bankers were the ones who pushed for it too with feminism, starting in the early 1900s (maybe even before that). They knew that women were more susceptible to caving in to public pressure and conform more readily than men, so they first changed the vote for senators to be a direct vote (17th Amendment), rather than elected via the legislatures; then they gave women the right to vote (19th Amendment) knowing that they’d vote in favor of whoever the propoganda media (newspapers and speeches) at the time said to vote for, thus granting control of the senate to whomever the media wanted, which of course would always be in the bankers’ favor (since they’d pay the media to write a certain way). Not to mention, changing it into a direct vote meant that senatorial candidates could now be bribed via campaign donations and such. Wanna know what’s so funny about all this? It coincides PRECISELY with the time of the First Red Scare, when commies were actively infilitrating the US, when communists began taking over Russia, and elsewhere around the world. Feminism was originally a Marxist ideology because they believe everyone is equal, as in there are no differences between men and women. International Women’s Day first started in Russia after all; it’s now all but dead there, and HUGE in the US (compared to other parts of the world anyway). Funnily enough, the crash of 1929 halted all of this because you can’t have equal rights between men and women when times are tough lol. That’s why women never sign up for the Selective Service Act and never complain about male-dominated jobs like plumbing or construction work or underwater welding or farming hahaha But anyway, to anyone who reads this, they wanted feminism because by having women work, that meant that households now had 2 incomes instead of just one, which meant that the huge corporations could increase the prices on everything and therefore make more money. This in turn caused inflation, which means that now women MUST work, whereas before they didn’t have to (just as an aside, women were able to work before; it just wasn’t in the culture to, but they most definitely were allowed to, so don’t believe in the bullshit feminist propoganda saying they couldn’t; the wage gap is also a myth, too). In the end, it royally fucked over men because all that happened was WE made less money in non-inflated terms. Also, the government supported this because they could now tax the other half of the population and by nature of that, have more control & money (which also gives more control). Not only that, but now kids were forced to go away to school at an earlier age. Before feminism, women would teach their children until the age of about 7 or 8 years old before sending their kids off to school. But now it’s 4, sometimes even earlier. Interestingly enough, Second Wave Feminism is also when the Elementary and Secondary Education Act was passed. So yeah, here’s another redpill for y’all.

7
zedrexvsyrex 7 points ago +7 / -0

So they’re extending how long they’re shorting it for, essentially, and in turn paying a whole lot more because of it, right? Because otherwise they’d have gone bankrupt already along with the banks that lent them money. And I correct on this?

1
zedrexvsyrex 1 point ago +1 / -0

The bus thing is pretty weird, not gonna lie. But the fireworks were done by the Dems, there was reporting on that so it’s nothing new. And I don’t think anyone got arrested because we’ve still seen Biden and his cronies make moves that negatively affect the country since the supposed “arresting” of all these people so it doesn’t seem like they were arrested after all :/

Also, don’t trust Juan O’Savin. He’s only in it for the money. The woman who made the video is innocent and is simply trying to report on it to give people some hopium, but Juan O’Savin has been wrong numerous times, when applying critical analysis of what he says, he never actually gives anything concrete. All he wants to do is sell his books and get donations and shit to scam people. People listen to him though because his voice is raspy and it makes them feel more relaxed when he feigns being relaxed himself and tells them not to worry.

4
zedrexvsyrex 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well they’re definitely having a real impact on everyday citizens across the country so you can’t just dismiss them...

1
zedrexvsyrex 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmmm. Well I suppose I stand corrected on the edit. However, it doesn’t change that he was seeking to implement policy regarding the US before he was inaugurated RIP. That is still illegal. I still think it’s dumb how he’s allowed to get away with it, too. We can already see the double standards with how he’s being treated vs Trump; his executive orders to override Trump’s aren’t ever disputed, whereas numerous courts blocked Trump’s executive orders to override Obama’s dozens of times. It’s stupid. And in a few weeks, Kamala is getting in. That’s all this is a ploy for. Even the libtards know that.

by AE13FE
1
zedrexvsyrex 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good planes lol

0
zedrexvsyrex 0 points ago +1 / -1

So in other words, your source is "dude, just trust me".

If you're going to post a conspiracy theory, make sure there is adequate evidence behind it.

  • Maritime laws are universally-agreed upon laws of the sea so as not to trespass on another nation's territory or do any other thing to piss off another nation (in other words, it's naval etiquette)This does not mean that all nations are businesses.

  • The US does not have "Inc." in its name, there are literally no documents that have that in there.

  • Names have been capitalized since before the US was even founded, much less before 1871. Even other nations and languages capitalize the first letter of their first and last names. Basic English grammar is not a conspiracy.

  • If capitalization matters so much to you, then why is it that the first letter in the word "corporation" isn't capitalized when talking about the US supposedly becoming a company? I'll tell you why: it's because it's bullshit and simply not true.

You are literally just spouting out nonsense. Stop.

1
zedrexvsyrex 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because you're trying to enact policies on the US in an official capacity without actually holding the position that gives you the authority to do so. For example, he met up with world leaders and was talking about policies to implement in the US; he was not technically president when this was occurring. This is illegal.

But of course, Democrats are above the law...

EDIT: I should also point out that the "Office of President-Elect" literally never existed before, and it is not a federal entity of any kind. This by itself makes what he was doing illegal. They only made it to normalize in people's mind that he was "president", even though he really wasn't; it was more of a psychological operation, I guess you could say.

1
zedrexvsyrex 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well that's the thing—he's saying that it was God's Will for the plan to fail then because the plan was made by men...

1
zedrexvsyrex 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is literally what I'm trying to say. The only person "sincerely dumb" here is you. You are a fucking retard lmfao

0
zedrexvsyrex 0 points ago +1 / -1

There are literally no sources in your post, it’s all conjecture bro. Maritime law is just how other nations/companies/entities deal with one another; it has nothing to do with turning the US into a business.

4
zedrexvsyrex 4 points ago +8 / -4

Don’t try to reinterpret religious texts to fit your skewed narrative. It’s one thing to have faith; it’s an entirely other thing to deny reality. God gave us a brain to think with. I suggest you use yours, asshole.

5
zedrexvsyrex 5 points ago +6 / -1

That “office” was a blatant violation of the Logan Act. It pisses me off how it’s never been used against him even though they tried to use it against Flynn.

-15
zedrexvsyrex -15 points ago +17 / -32

No.

That verse is saying to trust in God above all because no matter what anyone plans, it is up to God. If anything, he’s saying it was God’s Will for The Plan to fail. :/

view more: Next ›