I think it's a cover story...I highly highly doubt that right now he would openly say "im at the white house, come and get me" I doubt he is has even stepped foot in there since yesterday.
At first glance, it looks bad. However, there are two things to consider here. Firstly, look at the wording of this:
"Yesterday's violence at the Capitol was reprehensible and contrary to the tenets of the United States Constitution."
Which violence was he referring to? The only notable instance of violence that I remember (not counting a few smashed windows) was an unarmed woman being shot to death while waving a flag.
Now, notice that he mentioned that the violence was "contrary to the tenets of the United States Constitution"? Crimes by citizens are not generally referred to as unconstitutional. Only crimes comitted by government officials or employees are usually referred to in such a manner. Could he be referring to the officer who shot Ashli Babbit?
Then, notice this:
I want to specifically recognize the service of the District of Columbia National Guard. They performed with honor, integrity, and alacrity to protect people and property from unlawful acts.
He specifically praises the National Guard, not whatever type of officer shot Ashli Babbit, and notes that the National Guard successfully protected both people and property from unlawful acts.
Also, Q did say this:
RED4: Movement of MIL assets [10th Mountain_1st Marine_CPSD_Marine_QVIR] to central locations under guise of citizen riot control.
Now, notice that he mentioned that the violence was "contrary to the tenets of the United States Constitution"?
Might I suggest a possible tie in with the violence and the reference to the tenets of the Constitution. Protest of certification for seven states was advertised before the session was started and both a house member and senator were expected to sign the document. Someone brought Antifa into the equation which resulted in five of those protest being discarded because the Senators were adversely influenced by the resulting violent action. Debate and presentation of evidence was severely curtailed. If someone opposing the certification protest instigated or directed Antifa, that would be interfering with a Constitutional function.
I thought it was very strange that he'd rush over there after being in Texas for a known location for days. That's like asking for them to do something. Probably a bait leak to see where it went to.
Q told us that POTUS would be in a safe place when the SHTF. He will not let us know where he is. That would be stupid to infinity. I don't know where he is, I don't care where he is as long as he and his family are safe.
BTW, get proton email accounts if you don't already have them because big tech will shutdown yahoo, gmail, and the rest if POTUS pulls the military lever. No, I have zero to do with proton mail. All i know is that it is based in Switzerland and was recommnded to me by someone in the military.
Who knows where he actually is to be honest. Wouldn’t surprise me if he’s somewhere unknown and classified at this point.
I think that’s the point, throw off deep state.
I didnt hear anything about him ever leaving texas
I think it's a cover story...I highly highly doubt that right now he would openly say "im at the white house, come and get me" I doubt he is has even stepped foot in there since yesterday.
Possibly trying to bait them into something?
What did he tweet
He posted a Twitter thread that you can read here:
https://greatawakening.win/p/11RhFdfj8D/ok-now-im-really-confused-chris-/
At first glance, it looks bad. However, there are two things to consider here. Firstly, look at the wording of this:
Which violence was he referring to? The only notable instance of violence that I remember (not counting a few smashed windows) was an unarmed woman being shot to death while waving a flag.
Now, notice that he mentioned that the violence was "contrary to the tenets of the United States Constitution"? Crimes by citizens are not generally referred to as unconstitutional. Only crimes comitted by government officials or employees are usually referred to in such a manner. Could he be referring to the officer who shot Ashli Babbit?
Then, notice this:
He specifically praises the National Guard, not whatever type of officer shot Ashli Babbit, and notes that the National Guard successfully protected both people and property from unlawful acts.
Also, Q did say this:
https://qalerts.app/?n=4414
So maybe he has to act as if he's on board with going after protesters.
Interesting. Thanks for breakdown
Now, notice that he mentioned that the violence was "contrary to the tenets of the United States Constitution"?
Might I suggest a possible tie in with the violence and the reference to the tenets of the Constitution. Protest of certification for seven states was advertised before the session was started and both a house member and senator were expected to sign the document. Someone brought Antifa into the equation which resulted in five of those protest being discarded because the Senators were adversely influenced by the resulting violent action. Debate and presentation of evidence was severely curtailed. If someone opposing the certification protest instigated or directed Antifa, that would be interfering with a Constitutional function.
Did he specifically say to a biden admin?
Yes
Just saw it , yes he did. Me confused now ☹
This is an information war. Disinformation is necessary.
But that tweet means as much as the GSA's tweet from back in December, right??
A long winded condemnation of Trump and that the DoD will help facilitate a peaceful transition of power to Biden.
Great. Got a link?
https://twitter.com/DeptofDefense/status/1347273126061735938
I don't see him condemning Trump anywhere but he did mention peaceful transition to Biden.
Yes this where we are discussing transfer vs transition. Thanks for link. Interesting times ahead.
https://mobile.twitter.com/DeptofDefense/status/1347273126061735938
Damn, I knew it was a diversion. He might be anywhere at this point.
plus with all the resignations at this point DS has even less ears to the ground. they are scared
Hell, he could be in his "fictious" Trump Hotel in Moscow!
I thought it was very strange that he'd rush over there after being in Texas for a known location for days. That's like asking for them to do something. Probably a bait leak to see where it went to.
He should be somewhere safe. He shouldn't be telling everyone where he REALLY is.
Trump is smart enough to not share the real info. All this Texas and Camp David talk is to cause confusion. FOG OF WAR
Q told us that POTUS would be in a safe place when the SHTF. He will not let us know where he is. That would be stupid to infinity. I don't know where he is, I don't care where he is as long as he and his family are safe. BTW, get proton email accounts if you don't already have them because big tech will shutdown yahoo, gmail, and the rest if POTUS pulls the military lever. No, I have zero to do with proton mail. All i know is that it is based in Switzerland and was recommnded to me by someone in the military.
Q said POTUS would be in classified location(s).
He had the Bullet shield up for his speech. This is not a game. No way he is telling us where he is. We need him so I am okay with that.