This needs to be spoken about more. I too was under the misconception it’d be from Trump but of course, you’re right, it can’t be from him. We need to look to someone else’s Twitter for this.
I'm assuming the announcement of mass arrests via mil would have to come from DOD, with POTUS staying out of the picture, if the DNI report kinda forces their hand about that since it shows proof of interference AND proves treason by Congress when they certified the fraud KNOWINGLY.
I don't want to be a "datefag", as they've been called, but (let me be a datefag) I wonder if 11.3 and 11.4 is actually 1.13 and 1.14. Just a hypothesis.
the date posted is 11/01 mirrored 1/11 right? Or is that not the correct date & I'm doing it wrong (sorry thats the 1st # I look at b4 any # in post itself)
Let me say nothing is out of the realm of possibility with Q. So that's why there are so many theories. We have to discuss and see which one sounds most plausible. It's definitely a group effort.
Amazing how these earliest posts seem to be playing out NOW. The Q post itself never said that would be Trump's last tweet. It said "Look to Twitter". Then "The Storm is upon us". Well We've seen what happened with Twitter. So...
Is there another way to express the idea 'look to twitter'? Odd wording, even by Q standards. It would seem that we're being told to watch tw for this announcement.
Could something happening to/with tw be a marker in time, instead of the place to look?
Exactly. Well said. Trump's last tweet was just me being hasty click-baity. Q didn't say it would be a tweet, just tasked us with keeping eyeballs on Twitter. After I was locked out of Twatstown I kinda stopped going there unless Q directed us to a tweet. Can't believe what a toxic cesspool of propaganda it has become!
Q #55 doesn't say it will be Trump account or Trump's tweet - that's just my speculation in the title. Twitter keeps fucking with him - banning, then back on - so wtf knows?
I just got done reading this as im sorta new here and wanted to look at that tweet. I have seen others mentioned it may not have to come POTUS. Which really got the wheels turning in the head. Maybe it won't come from twitter but if it does maybe it could come from someone unexpected? Someone that would never be blocked?
Edit of course this post does reference the EBS thats something that would be interesting. I did always question why Trump wanted to test it out I cant remember the year he did it but it was fairly early on.
The FCC just this week sent a reminder to all TV radio and media, that they are bound by law to put out any and all EBS messages... there have been amber alerts across the US this week (testing the systems imo).
I don't understand why people believe that the "my fellow Americans" post would be from POTUS.
Looking specifically at the "On POTUS' order we..." which makes the speaking/author "not" POTUS. It would be "on my order" if author is POTUS.
I am expecting this to be from Christopher Miller or Pompeo.
This needs to be spoken about more. I too was under the misconception it’d be from Trump but of course, you’re right, it can’t be from him. We need to look to someone else’s Twitter for this.
@POTUS is still active.
I'm assuming the announcement of mass arrests via mil would have to come from DOD, with POTUS staying out of the picture, if the DNI report kinda forces their hand about that since it shows proof of interference AND proves treason by Congress when they certified the fraud KNOWINGLY.
Look to Twitter: Exactly this: "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us......." God bless.
[Look to Twitter] none specific, 10-4
I don't want to be a "datefag", as they've been called, but (let me be a datefag) I wonder if 11.3 and 11.4 is actually 1.13 and 1.14. Just a hypothesis.
Or 3.11 and 4.11?
Or the original date in the constitution, 3.4?
The storm should’ve started well before then.
the date posted is 11/01 mirrored 1/11 right? Or is that not the correct date & I'm doing it wrong (sorry thats the 1st # I look at b4 any # in post itself)
Are there other precedents where the dot is transposed like that? Would that be something Q would do in that manner?
Let me say nothing is out of the realm of possibility with Q. So that's why there are so many theories. We have to discuss and see which one sounds most plausible. It's definitely a group effort.
Amazing how these earliest posts seem to be playing out NOW. The Q post itself never said that would be Trump's last tweet. It said "Look to Twitter". Then "The Storm is upon us". Well We've seen what happened with Twitter. So...
Ok, in the spirit of expanding the mind:
Is there another way to express the idea 'look to twitter'? Odd wording, even by Q standards. It would seem that we're being told to watch tw for this announcement.
Could something happening to/with tw be a marker in time, instead of the place to look?
Exactly. Well said. Trump's last tweet was just me being hasty click-baity. Q didn't say it would be a tweet, just tasked us with keeping eyeballs on Twitter. After I was locked out of Twatstown I kinda stopped going there unless Q directed us to a tweet. Can't believe what a toxic cesspool of propaganda it has become!
Rush doesn't call it the Twitter Sewer for nothing.
Well I guess that won't be his last tweet because he's banned from Twitter.
Potus account is still on twitter
Twatter will just delete it as soon as it goes up.
Unless patriots are constantly watching and re-tweet images of it undetectable by algos as discussed by Q regarding meme warfare?
Man your stations.
It just needs to be used once
Dang. There ya go.
Q #55 doesn't say it will be Trump account or Trump's tweet - that's just my speculation in the title. Twitter keeps fucking with him - banning, then back on - so wtf knows?
Image of Q post #55 for reference.
I just got done reading this as im sorta new here and wanted to look at that tweet. I have seen others mentioned it may not have to come POTUS. Which really got the wheels turning in the head. Maybe it won't come from twitter but if it does maybe it could come from someone unexpected? Someone that would never be blocked?
Edit of course this post does reference the EBS thats something that would be interesting. I did always question why Trump wanted to test it out I cant remember the year he did it but it was fairly early on.
The FCC just this week sent a reminder to all TV radio and media, that they are bound by law to put out any and all EBS messages... there have been amber alerts across the US this week (testing the systems imo).
I believe it was before the midterms. When everyone got the message on their phone and people freaked out
people are saying this was already said by Grassley?
so isn't this checked off?
If it isn't checked off, then it doesn't say Trump will say it, or at least on Trump's account.
When did Grassley supposedly say this? Any proof?
Posters said it here on GA. I tried looking for it but couldn't find it myself.
Trump still has the POTUS twitter account.......
Was Pedosta arrested or not?
Maybe Pompeo's recent tweet about following him on Twitter?
Nowhere does it say POTUS will tweet that. No one has learned to read in a legal sense, apparently. It says look to Twitter, not POTUS Twitter.